World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
36
Citations
6584
World Ranking
11128
National Ranking
558

Alexander Raake publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Alexander Raake sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 280 publications — 69th percentile

69% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Alexander Raake D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Alexander Raake sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Alexander Raake is affiliated with the Ilmenau University of Technology in Germany. Their research primarily falls within the field of Computer Science, with a strong focus on subfields such as Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Human-Computer Interaction, Cognitive Neuroscience, Media Technology, and Sociology and Political Science.

The scientist has a significant body of work concentrated on topics including Image and Video Quality Assessment, Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts, Visual Attention and Saliency Detection, Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation, Advanced Image Processing Techniques, Noise Effects and Management, and Augmented Reality Applications.

Raake has contributed to various publication venues, with notable frequency in IEEE Access and Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research), each with 11 publications. Other key venues include arXiv (Cornell University) with 9 publications, the International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health with 4 publications, and IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics with 3 publications.

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Raake include:

  • Videoconference Fatigue: A Conceptual Analysis (2022), International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
  • A Systematic Review on the Visualization of Avatars and Agents in AR & VR displayed using Head-Mounted Displays (2023), IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics
  • Analysis of Appeal for Realistic AI-Generated Photos (2023), IEEE Access
  • Can Communication Technologies Reduce Loneliness and Social Isolation in Older People? A Scoping Review of Reviews (2022), International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
  • Subjective Evaluation of Visual Quality and Simulator Sickness of Short 360° Videos: ITU-T Rec. P.919 (2021), IEEE Transactions on Multimedia

Frequent collaborators include Stephan Fremerey, Steve Göring, Rakesh Rao Ramachandra Rao, Wolfgang Broll, and Janina Fels.

Best Publications

  • Qualinet White Paper on Definitions of Quality of Experience

    Kjell Brunnström;Sergio Ariel Beker;Katrien de Moor;Ann Dooms

  • Speech Quality of VoIP: Assessment and Prediction

    Alexander Raake

  • Quality of Experience: Advanced Concepts, Applications and Methods

    Sebastian Mller;Alexander Raake

  • Study of Rating Scales for Subjective Quality Assessment of High-Definition Video

    Quan Huynh-Thu;M-N Garcia;F Speranza;P Corriveau

  • Spatial Sound With Loudspeakers and Its Perception: A Review of the Current State

    S. Spors;H. Wierstorf;A. Raake;F. Melchior

  • Speech Quality Estimation: Models and Trends

    S. Moller;Wai-Yip Chan;Nicolas Cote;Tiago H. Falk

  • Quality and Quality of Experience

    Alexander Raake;Sebastian Egger

  • Quality of Experience

    Sebastian Möller;Alexander Raake

  • HTTP adaptive streaming QoE estimation with ITU-T rec. P. 1203: open databases and software

    Werner Robitza;Steve Göring;Alexander Raake;David Lindegren

  • Measuring and comparing QoE and simulator sickness of omnidirectional videos in different head mounted displays

    Ashutosh Singla;Stephan Fremerey;Werner Robitza;Alexander Raake

  • Quality of experience and HTTP adaptive streaming: a review of subjective studies

    M-N Garcia;F De Simone;S Tavakoli;Nicolas Staelens

  • Why are you so slow? – Misattribution of transmission delay to attributes of the conversation partner at the far-end

    Katrin Schoenenberg;Alexander Raake;Judith Koeppe

  • A bitstream-based, scalable video-quality model for HTTP adaptive streaming: ITU-T P.1203.1

    Alexander Raake;Marie-Neige Garcia;Werner Robitza;Peter List

  • Impairment Factor Framework for Wide-Band Speech Codecs

    S. Moller;A. Raake;N. Kitawaki;A. Takahashi

  • T-V-model: Parameter-based prediction of IPTV quality

    A. Raake;M.N. Garcia;S. Moller;J. Berger

  • Short- and Long-Term Packet Loss Behavior: Towards Speech Quality Prediction for Arbitrary Loss Distributions

    A. Raake

  • GBVS360, BMS360, ProSal: Extending existing saliency prediction models from 2D to omnidirectional images

    Pierre R. Lebreton;Alexander Raake

  • Memo: towards automatic usability evaluation of spoken dialogue services by user error simulations.

    Sebastian Möller;Roman Englert;Klaus-Peter Engelbrecht;Verena Vanessa Hafner

  • Evaluating Depth Perception of 3D Stereoscopic Videos

    P. Lebreton;A. Raake;M. Barkowsky;P. Le Callet

  • Quality Dimensions of Narrowband and Wideband Speech Transmission

    M. Wältermann;A. Raake;S. Möller

Frequent Co-Authors

Sebastian Möller
Sebastian Möller Technical University of Berlin
Patrick Le Callet
Patrick Le Callet University of Nantes
Raimund Schatz
Raimund Schatz Austrian Institute of Technology
Maria G. Martini
Maria G. Martini Kingston University
Ville Pulkki
Ville Pulkki Aalto University
Peter Schelkens
Peter Schelkens Vrije Universiteit Brussel
Xuyun Zhang
Xuyun Zhang Macquarie University
Tiago H. Falk
Tiago H. Falk Institut National de la Recherche Scientifique
Luigi Atzori
Luigi Atzori University of Cagliari
Touradj Ebrahimi
Touradj Ebrahimi École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a computer science degree opens doors to a wide range of tech careers but there are also many related fields worth considering. For example, many students are interested in what can you do with an environmental studies degree to explore how technology shapes sustainability and environmental protection.

Those seeking a faster route to entering the workforce might choose a computer science accelerated program. These flexible online options let you complete your degree in less time, ideal for motivated students looking for quick results.

If you have a passion for engineering, an environmental engineering degree online can focus your skills toward designing sustainable solutions. Alternatively, an online degree in mechanical engineering will prepare you for careers in robotics, manufacturing, and automotive industries.

Whether you choose computer science or other technical fields, exploring online degrees allows for greater flexibility, affordability, and access to specialized career pathways.

Best Scientists Citing Alexander Raake

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles