World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
46
Citations
9515
World Ranking
6799
National Ranking
269

Tiago H. Falk publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tiago H. Falk sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 287 publications — 71st percentile

71% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Tiago H. Falk D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tiago H. Falk sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 46 D-Index — 53rd percentile

53% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Tiago H. Falk is affiliated with the Institut National de la Recherche Scientifique in Canada. Their research spans multiple areas, primarily within cognitive neuroscience, signal processing, and artificial intelligence. The scientist's work also touches on cardiology and cardiovascular medicine, along with experimental and cognitive psychology.

The fields of study associated with their research include:

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Signal Processing
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

Their research addresses a variety of topics, including speech and audio processing, EEG and brain-computer interfaces, and functional brain connectivity. Other topical focuses are speech recognition and synthesis, music and audio processing, non-invasive vital sign monitoring, and heart rate variability and autonomic control.

Main topics covered by their work are:

  • Speech and Audio Processing
  • Speech Recognition and Synthesis
  • EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Music and Audio Processing
  • Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
  • Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies

Tiago H. Falk has published in a range of venues, with frequent contributions to journals and conferences like:

  • IEEE Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics Systems
  • IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • IEEE Systems Man and Cybernetics Magazine
  • Frontiers in Virtual Reality

Among their recent publications are:

  • "A comprehensive survey on multimodal medical signals fusion for smart healthcare systems" (2021), published in Information Fusion
  • "TILES-2018, a longitudinal physiologic and behavioral data set of hospital workers" (2020), published in Scientific Data
  • "Virtual reality and non-invasive brain stimulation for rehabilitation applications: a systematic review" (2020), published in Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
  • "Generalized end-to-end detection of spoofing attacks to automatic speaker recognizers" (2020), published in Computer Speech & Language
  • "WAUC: A Multi-Modal Database for Mental Workload Assessment Under Physical Activity" (2020), published in Frontiers in Neuroscience

The scientist has collaborated extensively with other researchers. Frequent coauthors include:

  • Giancarlo Fortino
  • Sam Kwong
  • Karen Panetta
  • Enrique Herrera-Viedma
  • Róbert Kozma

Best Publications

  • Deep learning-based electroencephalography analysis: a systematic review.

    Yannick Roy;Hubert J. Banville;Isabela Albuquerque;Alexandre Gramfort

  • Automatic speech emotion recognition using modulation spectral features

    Siqing Wu;Tiago H. Falk;Wai-Yip Chan

  • A Non-Intrusive Quality and Intelligibility Measure of Reverberant and Dereverberated Speech

    Tiago H Falk;Chenxi Zheng;Wai-Yip Chan

  • Systematic Review on Resting-State EEG for Alzheimer’s Disease Diagnosis and Progression Assessment

    Raymundo Cassani;Mar Estarellas;Mar Estarellas;Rodrigo San-Martin;Francisco J. Fraga

  • A comprehensive survey on multimodal medical signals fusion for smart healthcare systems

    Ghulam Muhammad;Fatima Alshehri;Fakhri Karray;Fakhri Karray;Abdulmotaleb El Saddik

  • Classification of prefrontal activity due to mental arithmetic and music imagery using hidden Markov models and frequency domain near-infrared spectroscopy

    Sarah D Power;Tiago H Falk;Tom Chau

  • Objective Quality and Intelligibility Prediction for Users of Assistive Listening Devices: Advantages and limitations of existing tools

    Tiago H. Falk;Vijay Parsa;Joao F Santos;Kathryn Arehart

  • Speech Quality Estimation: Models and Trends

    S. Moller;Wai-Yip Chan;Nicolas Cote;Tiago H. Falk

  • A Review of Indoor Localization Technologies: towards Navigational Assistance for Topographical Disorientation

    Jorge Torres-Solis;Tiago H. Falk;Tom Chau

  • Context awareness in WBANs: a survey on medical and non-medical applications

    D. P. Tobón;T. H. Falk;M. Maier

  • Finite-state Markov modeling of correlated Rician-fading channels

    C. Pimentel;T.H. Falk;L. Lisboa

  • Robust GMM Based Gender Classification using Pitch and RASTA-PLP Parameters of Speech

    Yu-min Zeng;Zhen-yang Wu;Tiago Falk;Wai-yip Chan

  • Modulation Spectral Features for Robust Far-Field Speaker Identification

    T.H. Falk;Wai-Yip Chan

  • Single-Ended Speech Quality Measurement Using Machine Learning Methods

    T.H. Falk;Wai-Yip Chan

  • Characterization of atypical vocal source excitation, temporal dynamics and prosody for objective measurement of dysarthric word intelligibility

    Tiago H. Falk;Wai-Yip Chan;Fraser Shein

  • Performance measurement for brain-computer or brain-machine interfaces: a tutorial

    David E. Thompson;Lucia R. Quitadamo;Luca Mainardi;Khalil Ur Rehman Laghari

  • On the development of a computer-based handwriting assessment tool to objectively quantify handwriting proficiency in children

    Tiago H. Falk;Cynthia Tam;Heidi Schellnus;Tom Chau

  • Audio-Visual Multimedia Quality Assessment: A Comprehensive Survey

    Zahid Akhtar;Tiago H. Falk

  • Temporal Dynamics for Blind Measurement of Room Acoustical Parameters

    T.H. Falk;Wai-Yip Chan

  • Relevance vector classifier decision fusion and EEG graph-theoretic features for automatic affective state characterization

    Rishabh Gupta;Khalil ur Rehman Laghari;Tiago H. Falk

  • Generalizing to unseen domains via distribution matching

    Isabela Albuquerque;João Monteiro;Mohammad Darvishi;Tiago H. Falk

Frequent Co-Authors

Tom Chau
Tom Chau University of Toronto
Sébastien Tremblay
Sébastien Tremblay Université Laval
Sebastian Möller
Sebastian Möller Technical University of Berlin
Shrikanth S. Narayanan
Shrikanth S. Narayanan University of Southern California
Ervin Sejdic
Ervin Sejdic University of Pittsburgh
Emilio Ferrara
Emilio Ferrara University of Southern California
David McAlpine
David McAlpine Macquarie University
Kristina Lerman
Kristina Lerman University of Southern California
Simon Doclo
Simon Doclo Carl von Ossietzky University of Oldenburg
Martin Maier
Martin Maier Institut National de la Recherche Scientifique

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring easy degrees to get online that pay well can be a smart way to fast-track your entry into the tech field. Many students choose these options to quickly gain skills that are in high demand, often offering flexible study schedules for those balancing work or family commitments.

Given the surge in technology-driven roles, online AI degree programs have become increasingly popular. Some of the most online ai degree programs are not only affordable but also provide rigorous training in machine learning, data science, and automation—skills valued by employers worldwide.

When considering which path to pursue, reviewing the best majors can help you align your studies with career prospects. Computer Science remains consistently listed among the top options, offering diverse job opportunities across sectors.

For those considering graduate education, some of the easiest masters programs to get into strike a balance between accessibility and quality. These programs can help working professionals advance their credentials without pausing their career.

Best Scientists Citing Tiago H. Falk

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles