World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Computer Science 46 6799 6600 269 256 287 9515

Tiago H. Falk publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Tiago H. Falk between 2002 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Tiago H. Falk published across 24 years, from 2002 to 2025, averaging 18 papers a year. Output peaked at 57 publications in 2022. 47 of the 433 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40 50
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2002 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 57. Peak 57 publications in 2022. 2002: 2 publications 2003: 2 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 5 publications 2007: 7 publications 2008: 6 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 16 publications 2011: 12 publications 2012: 12 publications 2013: 26 publications 2014: 16 publications 2015: 16 publications 2016: 18 publications 2017: 23 publications 2018: 26 publications 2019: 39 publications 2020: 25 publications 2021: 18 publications 2022: 57 publications 2023: 48 publications 2024: 32 publications 2025: 15 publications
2002 2025

433 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Tiago H. Falk: publications per year, 2002 to 2025
Year Publications
2002 2
2003 2
2004 4
2005 3
2006 5
2007 7
2008 6
2009 5
2010 16
2011 12
2012 12
2013 26
2014 16
2015 16
2016 18
2017 23
2018 26
2019 39
2020 25
2021 18
2022 57
2023 48
2024 32
2025 15
Total 433
Download as CSV

Tiago H. Falk publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tiago H. Falk sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 32–41 to 991+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 609. Most scientists, 609, have 142–151 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 282–291 publications, is where this scientist sits. 32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32–41 publications 991+

This scientist: 287 publications — 71st percentile

71% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
32–41 7
42–51 22
52–61 82
62–71 134
72–81 249
82–91 324
92–101 421
102–111 420
112–121 497
122–131 544
132–141 555
142–151 609
152–161 559
162–171 534
172–181 556
182–191 583
192–201 519
202–211 508
212–221 490
222–231 437
232–241 423
242–251 408
252–261 377
262–271 301
272–281 335
282–291 320 287
292–301 293
302–311 250
312–321 238
322–331 206
332–341 209
342–351 208
352–361 162
362–371 176
372–381 127
382–391 158
392–401 128
402–411 104
412–421 94
422–431 99
432–441 83
442–451 108
452–461 73
462–471 77
472–481 69
482–491 84
492–501 62
502–511 54
512–521 57
522–531 51
532–541 51
542–551 32
552–561 38
562–571 28
572–581 43
582–591 33
592–601 41
602–611 32
612–621 28
622–631 25
632–641 27
642–651 17
652–661 20
662–671 17
672–681 15
682–691 14
692–701 21
702–711 13
712–721 12
722–731 19
732–741 14
742–751 12
752–761 10
762–771 10
772–781 11
782–791 10
792–801 11
802–811 8
812–821 8
822–831 7
832–841 11
842–851 10
852–861 5
862–871 9
872–881 4
882–891 6
892–901 3
902–911 6
912–921 3
922–931 2
932–941 2
942–951 2
952–961 3
962–971 3
972–981 3
982–990 5
991+ 100
Download as CSV

Tiago H. Falk D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tiago H. Falk sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 52 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 131+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 990. Most scientists, 990, have 36–37 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 46–47 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 46 D-Index — 53rd percentile

53% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 879
32–33 983
34–35 918
36–37 990
38–39 968
40–41 907
42–43 821
44–45 763
46–47 689 46
48–49 543
50–51 543
52–53 518
54–55 500
56–57 458
58–59 400
60–61 337
62–63 308
64–65 292
66–67 249
68–69 213
70–71 192
72–73 189
74–75 165
76–77 139
78–79 119
80–81 121
82–83 113
84–85 88
86–87 87
88–89 75
90–91 69
92–93 57
94–95 46
96–97 38
98–99 34
100–101 36
102–103 27
104–105 37
106–107 18
108–109 31
110–111 19
112–113 16
114–115 12
116–117 20
118–119 15
120–121 5
122–123 20
124–125 8
126–127 5
128–129 7
130 3
131+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Tiago H. Falk is affiliated with the Institut National de la Recherche Scientifique in Canada. Their research spans multiple areas, primarily within cognitive neuroscience, signal processing, and artificial intelligence. The scientist's work also touches on cardiology and cardiovascular medicine, along with experimental and cognitive psychology.

The fields of study associated with their research include:

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Signal Processing
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

Their research addresses a variety of topics, including speech and audio processing, EEG and brain-computer interfaces, and functional brain connectivity. Other topical focuses are speech recognition and synthesis, music and audio processing, non-invasive vital sign monitoring, and heart rate variability and autonomic control.

Main topics covered by their work are:

  • Speech and Audio Processing
  • Speech Recognition and Synthesis
  • EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Music and Audio Processing
  • Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
  • Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies

Tiago H. Falk has published in a range of venues, with frequent contributions to journals and conferences like:

  • IEEE Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics Systems
  • IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • IEEE Systems Man and Cybernetics Magazine
  • Frontiers in Virtual Reality

Among their recent publications are:

  • "A comprehensive survey on multimodal medical signals fusion for smart healthcare systems" (2021), published in Information Fusion
  • "TILES-2018, a longitudinal physiologic and behavioral data set of hospital workers" (2020), published in Scientific Data
  • "Virtual reality and non-invasive brain stimulation for rehabilitation applications: a systematic review" (2020), published in Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
  • "Generalized end-to-end detection of spoofing attacks to automatic speaker recognizers" (2020), published in Computer Speech & Language
  • "WAUC: A Multi-Modal Database for Mental Workload Assessment Under Physical Activity" (2020), published in Frontiers in Neuroscience

The scientist has collaborated extensively with other researchers. Frequent coauthors include:

  • Giancarlo Fortino
  • Sam Kwong
  • Karen Panetta
  • Enrique Herrera-Viedma
  • Róbert Kozma

Best Publications

  • Deep learning-based electroencephalography analysis: a systematic review.

    Yannick Roy;Hubert J. Banville;Isabela Albuquerque;Alexandre Gramfort

  • Automatic speech emotion recognition using modulation spectral features

    Siqing Wu;Tiago H. Falk;Wai-Yip Chan

  • A Non-Intrusive Quality and Intelligibility Measure of Reverberant and Dereverberated Speech

    Tiago H Falk;Chenxi Zheng;Wai-Yip Chan

  • Systematic Review on Resting-State EEG for Alzheimer’s Disease Diagnosis and Progression Assessment

    Raymundo Cassani;Mar Estarellas;Mar Estarellas;Rodrigo San-Martin;Francisco J. Fraga

  • A comprehensive survey on multimodal medical signals fusion for smart healthcare systems

    Ghulam Muhammad;Fatima Alshehri;Fakhri Karray;Fakhri Karray;Abdulmotaleb El Saddik

  • Classification of prefrontal activity due to mental arithmetic and music imagery using hidden Markov models and frequency domain near-infrared spectroscopy

    Sarah D Power;Tiago H Falk;Tom Chau

  • Objective Quality and Intelligibility Prediction for Users of Assistive Listening Devices: Advantages and limitations of existing tools

    Tiago H. Falk;Vijay Parsa;Joao F Santos;Kathryn Arehart

  • Speech Quality Estimation: Models and Trends

    S. Moller;Wai-Yip Chan;Nicolas Cote;Tiago H. Falk

  • A Review of Indoor Localization Technologies: towards Navigational Assistance for Topographical Disorientation

    Jorge Torres-Solis;Tiago H. Falk;Tom Chau

  • Context awareness in WBANs: a survey on medical and non-medical applications

    D. P. Tobón;T. H. Falk;M. Maier

  • Finite-state Markov modeling of correlated Rician-fading channels

    C. Pimentel;T.H. Falk;L. Lisboa

  • Robust GMM Based Gender Classification using Pitch and RASTA-PLP Parameters of Speech

    Yu-min Zeng;Zhen-yang Wu;Tiago Falk;Wai-yip Chan

  • Modulation Spectral Features for Robust Far-Field Speaker Identification

    T.H. Falk;Wai-Yip Chan

  • Single-Ended Speech Quality Measurement Using Machine Learning Methods

    T.H. Falk;Wai-Yip Chan

  • Characterization of atypical vocal source excitation, temporal dynamics and prosody for objective measurement of dysarthric word intelligibility

    Tiago H. Falk;Wai-Yip Chan;Fraser Shein

  • Performance measurement for brain-computer or brain-machine interfaces: a tutorial

    David E. Thompson;Lucia R. Quitadamo;Luca Mainardi;Khalil Ur Rehman Laghari

  • On the development of a computer-based handwriting assessment tool to objectively quantify handwriting proficiency in children

    Tiago H. Falk;Cynthia Tam;Heidi Schellnus;Tom Chau

  • Audio-Visual Multimedia Quality Assessment: A Comprehensive Survey

    Zahid Akhtar;Tiago H. Falk

  • Temporal Dynamics for Blind Measurement of Room Acoustical Parameters

    T.H. Falk;Wai-Yip Chan

  • Relevance vector classifier decision fusion and EEG graph-theoretic features for automatic affective state characterization

    Rishabh Gupta;Khalil ur Rehman Laghari;Tiago H. Falk

  • Generalizing to unseen domains via distribution matching

    Isabela Albuquerque;João Monteiro;Mohammad Darvishi;Tiago H. Falk

Frequent Co-Authors

Tom Chau
Tom Chau University of Toronto
Sébastien Tremblay
Sébastien Tremblay Université Laval
Sebastian Möller
Sebastian Möller Technical University of Berlin
Shrikanth S. Narayanan
Shrikanth S. Narayanan University of Southern California
Ervin Sejdic
Ervin Sejdic University of Pittsburgh
Emilio Ferrara
Emilio Ferrara University of Southern California
David McAlpine
David McAlpine Macquarie University
Kristina Lerman
Kristina Lerman University of Southern California
Simon Doclo
Simon Doclo Carl von Ossietzky University of Oldenburg
Martin Maier
Martin Maier Institut National de la Recherche Scientifique

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring easy degrees to get online that pay well can be a smart way to fast-track your entry into the tech field. Many students choose these options to quickly gain skills that are in high demand, often offering flexible study schedules for those balancing work or family commitments.

Given the surge in technology-driven roles, online AI degree programs have become increasingly popular. Some of the most online ai degree programs are not only affordable but also provide rigorous training in machine learning, data science, and automation—skills valued by employers worldwide.

When considering which path to pursue, reviewing the best majors can help you align your studies with career prospects. Computer Science remains consistently listed among the top options, offering diverse job opportunities across sectors.

For those considering graduate education, some of the easiest masters programs to get into strike a balance between accessibility and quality. These programs can help working professionals advance their credentials without pausing their career.

Best Scientists Citing Tiago H. Falk

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles