World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
31
Citations
3835
World Ranking
13704
National Ranking
874

Maria G. Martini publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Maria G. Martini sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 212 publications — 51st percentile

51% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Maria G. Martini D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Maria G. Martini sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 31 D-Index — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Maria G. Martini is affiliated with Kingston University in the United Kingdom. Their research encompasses areas within computer science and engineering, with a focus on topics related to image and video quality assessment, video coding and compression technologies, and imaging sensors.

The scientist's primary fields of study include:

  • Computer Science (49 publications)
  • Engineering (22 publications)

Subfields of their research feature:

  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (35 publications)
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering (17 publications)
  • Signal Processing (8 publications)
  • Cognitive Neuroscience (3 publications)
  • Computer Networks and Communications (3 publications)

Major research topics covered by Maria G. Martini span:

  • Image and Video Quality Assessment (34 publications)
  • Video Coding and Compression Technologies (14 publications)
  • CCD and CMOS Imaging Sensors (10 publications)
  • Advanced Memory and Neural Computing (8 publications)
  • Image Enhancement Techniques (8 publications)
  • Advanced Vision and Imaging (8 publications)
  • Visual Attention and Saliency Detection (6 publications)

Published papers from recent years include:

  • Multivariate Regression-Based Convolutional Neural Network Model for Fundus Image Quality Assessment, 2020, IEEE Access
  • Time-Aggregation-Based Lossless Video Encoding for Neuromorphic Vision Sensor Data, 2020, IEEE Internet of Things Journal
  • Lossless Compression of Data From Static and Mobile Dynamic Vision Sensors-Performance and Trade-Offs, 2020, IEEE Access
  • Estimation of Quality Scores From Subjective Tests-Beyond Subjects' MOS, 2020, IEEE Transactions on Multimedia
  • Power Allocation for D2D Communications Using Max-Min Message-Passing Algorithm, 2020, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Maria G. Martini include:

  • Nabajeet Barman (9 joint publications)
  • Nabeel Khan (6 joint publications)
  • Jayasingam Adhuran (3 joint publications)
  • Yuriy A. Reznik (3 joint publications)
  • Khurram Iqbal (2 joint publications)

Their work has been disseminated in various publication venues with multiple contributions to:

  • arXiv (Cornell University) - 7 publications
  • IEEE Access - 5 publications
  • Electronics - 4 publications
  • IEEE Internet of Things Journal - 1 publication
  • IEEE Transactions on Multimedia - 1 publication

Best Publications

  • QoE Management of Multimedia Streaming Services in Future Networks: A Tutorial and Survey

    Alcardo Alex Barakabitze;Nabajeet Barman;Arslan Ahmad;Saman Zadtootaghaj

  • QoE Modeling for HTTP Adaptive Video Streaming–A Survey and Open Challenges

    Nabajeet Barman;Maria G. Martini

  • Psychophysiology-Based QoE Assessment: A Survey

    Ulrich Engelke;Daniel P. Darcy;Grant H. Mulliken;Sebastian Bosse

  • Medical QoS provision based on reinforcement learning in ultrasound streaming over 3.5G wireless systems

    R.S.H. Istepanian;N.Y. Philip;M.G. Martini

  • On sequential frame synchronization in AWGN channels

    M. Chiani;M.G. Martini

  • Content adaptive network aware joint optimization of wireless video transmission

    M.G. Martini;M. Mazzotti;C. Lamy-Bergot;J. Huusko

  • Reduced-reference quality metric for 3D depth map transmission

    Chaminda T. E. R. Hewage;Maria G. Martini

  • Quality of experience for 3D video streaming

    C. T. E. R. Hewage;M. G. Martini

  • Reduced-reference quality assessment for 3D video compression and transmission

    C. T. E. R. Hewage;M. G. Martini

  • No-Reference Video Quality Estimation Based on Machine Learning for Passive Gaming Video Streaming Applications

    Nabajeet Barman;Emmanuel Jammeh;Seyed Ali Ghorashi;Maria G. Martini

  • Fundus image quality assessment: survey, challenges, and future scope

    Aditya Raj;Anil Kumar Tiwari;Maria G. Martini

  • A downlink scheduling approach for balancing QoS in LTE wireless networks

    Moustafa M. Nasralla;Maria G. Martini

  • Cross-layer architecture for scalable video transmission in wireless network

    J. Huusko;J. Vehkaperä;P. Amon;C. Lamy-Bergot

  • A study on quality assessment for medical ultrasound video compressed via HEVC.

    Manzoor Razaak;Maria G. Martini;Ketty Savino

  • Image quality assessment based on edge preservation

    Maria G. Martini;Chaminda T. E. R. Hewage;Barbara Villarini

  • Flexible macroblock ordering for context-aware ultrasound video transmission over mobile WiMAX

    Maria G. Martini;Chaminda T. E. R. Hewage

  • An Evaluation of Video Quality Assessment Metrics for Passive Gaming Video Streaming

    Nabajeet Barman;Steven Schmidt;Saman Zadtootaghaj;Maria G. Martini

  • Challenges of future multimedia QoE monitoring for internet service providers

    Werner Robitza;Arslan Ahmad;Peter A. Kara;Luigi Atzori

  • NR-GVQM: A No Reference Gaming Video Quality Metric

    Saman Zadtootaghaj;Nabajeet Barman;Steven Schmidt;Maria G. Martini

  • Evaluation of the Concept of Dynamic Adaptive Streaming of Light Field Video

    Peter A. Kara;Aron Cserkaszky;Maria G. Martini;Attila Barsi

  • GamingVideoSET: a dataset for gaming video streaming applications

    Nabajeet Barman;Saman Zadtootaghaj;Steven Schmidt;Maria G. Martini

Frequent Co-Authors

Marco Chiani
Marco Chiani University of Bologna
Sebastian Möller
Sebastian Möller Technical University of Berlin
Robert S. H. Istepanian
Robert S. H. Istepanian Imperial College London
Alexander Raake
Alexander Raake Ilmenau University of Technology
Luigi Atzori
Luigi Atzori University of Cagliari
Davide Dardari
Davide Dardari University of Bologna
Soon Xin Ng
Soon Xin Ng University of Southampton
Mohammad Shikh-Bahaei
Mohammad Shikh-Bahaei King's College London
Dapeng Wu
Dapeng Wu City University of Hong Kong
Honggang Wang
Honggang Wang University of Massachusetts Dartmouth

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees and certificate programs in technology can be a smart way to advance your career quickly and affordably. For those interested in data-driven fields, it’s important to consider not only the quality, but also what is the cheapest data science course in the US? Pursuing cost-effective programs can make a significant impact on your return on investment.

If you’re thinking about broadening your skills, an online bachelor’s in electrical engineering can lead to diverse high-demand roles in tech and engineering industries. For those pressed for time or looking for quick upskilling, you might explore certificate programs that pay well, providing a fast entry into lucrative job markets.

Some learners prefer to earn advanced credentials at maximum speed. In these cases, consider the shortest masters degree programs online to save time while gaining the expertise needed to move up in your chosen field. Whether you’re starting a career or upskilling, these flexible online options can help you rapidly achieve your educational and career goals.

Best Scientists Citing Maria G. Martini

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles