World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
76
Citations
20426
World Ranking
18812
National Ranking
9381

Mark L. Rosenblum publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark L. Rosenblum sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 249 publications — 8th percentile

8% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Mark L. Rosenblum D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark L. Rosenblum sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 76 D-Index — 8th percentile

8% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Mark L. Rosenblum is affiliated with the Henry Ford Health System in the United States and has a research focus spanning medicine, biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology. Their work centers on several specialized areas including glioma diagnosis and treatment, epigenetics and DNA methylation, pituitary gland disorders and treatments, meningioma and schwannoma management, brain metastases and treatment, radiomics and machine learning in medical imaging, and cancer genomics and diagnostics.

Their recent publications reflect ongoing contributions to neuro-oncology and related fields. Key papers include:

  • A serum-based DNA methylation assay provides accurate detection of glioma, 2021, Neuro-Oncology
  • Detection of diagnostic and prognostic methylation-based signatures in liquid biopsy specimens from patients with meningiomas, 2023, Nature Communications
  • Detection of tumor-specific DNA methylation markers in the blood of patients with pituitary neuroendocrine tumors, 2022, Neuro-Oncology
  • Detection of Circulating Tumor-specific DNA Methylation Markers in the Blood of Patients with Pituitary Tumors, 2020, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Neurosurgery's Impact on Neuro-Oncology-"Can We Do Better?"-Lessons Learned Over 50 Years, 2022, Neurosurgery

Mark L. Rosenblum frequently collaborates with other researchers, notably with Steven N. Kalkanis, James M. Snyder, Adam Robin, Jack Rock, and Ian Lee, with several coauthored works among these colleagues.

The scientist's publications are most often found in venues such as Neuro-Oncology, Nature Communications, Neurosurgery, Frontiers in Oncology, and bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory).

Their research predominantly spans the main fields of:

  • Medicine
  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology

Within these fields, more specific subfields include:

  • Genetics
  • Molecular Biology
  • Epidemiology
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine

Major topics investigated in their body of work consist of:

  • Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
  • Pituitary Gland Disorders and Treatments
  • Meningioma and schwannoma management
  • Brain Metastases and Treatment
  • Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
  • Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics

Best Publications

  • Neurological manifestations of the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS): Experience at UCSF and review of the literature

    Robert M. Levy;Dale E. Bredesen;Mark L. Rosenblum

  • Clonal expansion of p53 mutant cells is associated with brain tumour progression

    David Sidransky;Tom Mikkelsen;Karl Schwechheimer;Mark L. Rosenblum

  • Spinal cord injury in rat: treatment with bone marrow stromal cell transplantation.

    Michael Chopp;Xue Hui Zhang;Yi Li;Lei Wang

  • A Phase I Open-Label, Dose-Escalation, Multi-Institutional Trial of Injection with an E1B-Attenuated Adenovirus, ONYX-015, into the Peritumoral Region of Recurrent Malignant Gliomas, in the Adjuvant Setting

    E. Antonio Chiocca;Khalid M. Abbed;Stephen Tatter;David N. Louis

  • Human immunodeficiency virus can productively infect cultured human glial cells.

    Cecilia Cheng-Mayer;James T. Rutka;Mark L. Rosenblum;Thomas McHugh

  • The extracellular matrix of the central and peripheral nervous systems: structure and function

    James T. Rutka;Gerard Apodaca;Robert Stern;Mark Rosenblum

  • Nocardial Brain Abscess: Treatment Strategies and Factors Influencing Outcome

    Adam N. Mamelak;William G. Obana;John F. Flaherty;Mark L. Rosenblum

  • Decreased mortality from brain abscesses since advent of computerized tomography.

    Mark L. Rosenblum;Julian T. Hoff;David Norman;Philip R. Weinstein

  • Primary central nervous system lymphomas: natural history and response to radiation therapy in 55 patients with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome

    James E. Baumgartner;Jacob R. Rachlin;Jay H. Beckstead;Timothy C. Meeker

  • Partial volume tolerance of the spinal cord and complications of single-dose radiosurgery†

    Samuel Ryu;Jian Yue Jin;Ryan Jin;Jack Rock

  • Intracerebral-mass lesions in the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS)

    Levy Rm;Pons Vg;Rosenblum Ml

  • Trends in the management of bacterial brain abscesses: a review of 102 cases over 17 years.

    Thomas J. Mampalam;Mark L. Rosenblum

  • Spinal epidural abscess: evaluation of factors influencing outcome.

    Rohit K. Khanna;Ghaus M. Malik;Jack P. Rock;Mark L. Rosenblum

  • Improved management of multiple brain abscesses: a combined surgical and medical approach.

    Adam N. Mamelak;Thomas J. Mampalam;William G. Obana;Mark L. Rosenblum

  • Cathepsin B Expression and Localization in Glioma Progression and Invasion

    Sandra A. Rempel;Mark L. Rosenblum;Tom Mikkelsen;Tom Mikkelsen;Pei Sha Yan

  • Genomic Changes and Gene Expression Profiles Reveal That Established Glioma Cell Lines Are Poorly Representative of Primary Human Gliomas

    Aiguo Li;Jennifer Walling;Yuri Kotliarov

  • Vascular endothelial growth factor expression and vascular density as prognostic markers of survival in patients with low-grade astrocytoma

    Saleem I. Abdulrauf;Klaus Edvardsen;Khang L. Ho;Xiao Yi Yang

  • Nonoperative treatment of brain abscesses in selected high-risk patients

    Mark L. Rosenblum;Julian T. Hoff;David Norman;Michael S. Edwards

  • Correlations between magnetic resonance spectroscopy and image-guided histopathology, with special attention to radiation necrosis.

    Jack P. Rock;David Hearshen;Lisa Scarpace;David Croteau

  • Patterns of failure after single-dose radiosurgery for spinal metastasis

    Samuel Ryu;Jack Rock;Mark Rosenblum;Jae Ho Kim

Frequent Co-Authors

Tom Mikkelsen
Tom Mikkelsen Henry Ford Health System
Charles B. Wilson
Charles B. Wilson University of California, San Francisco
Dale E. Bredesen
Dale E. Bredesen University of California, Los Angeles
James T. Rutka
James T. Rutka University of Toronto
Richard L. Davis
Richard L. Davis University of California, San Francisco
Benjamin Movsas
Benjamin Movsas Henry Ford Health System
Houtan Noushmehr
Houtan Noushmehr Henry Ford Health System
David Norman
David Norman University of California, San Francisco
Robert S. Stern
Robert S. Stern Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Philip Weinstein
Philip Weinstein University of Adelaide

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re considering studying medicine in the USA but are exploring alternative pathways or healthcare careers, there are several online degree options worth considering. One increasingly popular choice is nursing, with different entry points available. For example, individuals without a nursing background can look into entry level msn programs online, which allow graduates from other fields to fast-track into advanced practice nursing.

Those seeking a more straightforward entry to nursing might research direct entry nursing programs or find nursing school no entrance exam options that do not require stressful standardized tests like the TEAS or HESI.

Not all healthcare careers require patient interaction. You might consider the administrative side of healthcare by attending one of the best online medical billing and coding schools. These programs prepare you for essential behind-the-scenes roles in medical offices and can often be completed entirely online, sometimes with financial aid available. Exploring these varied educational options can help you find the best fit for your skills and interests in the healthcare sector.

Best Scientists Citing Mark L. Rosenblum

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles