World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
61
Citations
13808
World Ranking
11313
National Ranking
808

Jens T. Siveke publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jens T. Siveke sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 327 publications — 82nd percentile

82% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Jens T. Siveke D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jens T. Siveke sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 61 D-Index — 44th percentile

44% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jens T. Siveke is affiliated with the German Cancer Research Center in Germany and has a significant body of work focused primarily in the fields of Medicine and Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology. Their research prominently addresses various aspects of oncology, particularly pancreatic and hepatic oncology, cancer genomics, and diagnostics.

Their recent scientific contributions include several publications, notable among them:

  • Microbiota-derived 3-IAA influences chemotherapy efficacy in pancreatic cancer, 2023, published in Nature
  • Comprehensive Genomic and Transcriptomic Analysis for Guiding Therapeutic Decisions in Patients with Rare Cancers, 2021, published in Cancer Discovery
  • The Latest Developments in Imaging of Fibroblast Activation Protein, 2020, published in Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • Nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine versus nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine followed by FOLFIRINOX induction chemotherapy in locally advanced pancreatic cancer (NEOLAP-AIO-PAK-0113): a multicentre, randomised, phase 2 trial, 2020, published in The Lancet. Gastroenterology & Hepatology
  • CellViT: Vision Transformers for precise cell segmentation and classification, 2024, published in Medical Image Analysis

Siveke has collaborated extensively with several frequent co-authors, including:

  • Martin Schüler
  • Rainer Hamacher
  • Marija Trajkovic-Arsic
  • Wolfgang P. Fendler
  • Stefan Kasper

Their publications appear repeatedly in several key scientific venues, which include:

  • Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Annals of Oncology
  • Journal of Clinical Oncology
  • ESMO Open

Jens T. Siveke's research spans important subfields such as Oncology, Cancer Research, Molecular Biology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging. Their work covers core topics including:

  • Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
  • Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
  • Peptidase Inhibition and Analysis
  • Protease and Inhibitor Mechanisms
  • Neuroendocrine Tumor Research Advances
  • Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
  • Cholangiocarcinoma and Gallbladder Cancer Studies

This profile outlines a research profile focused on advancing knowledge and clinical approaches in cancer biology, especially regarding pancreatic cancer treatment, molecular diagnostics, and imaging technologies.

Best Publications

  • Nanoliposomal irinotecan with fluorouracil and folinic acid in metastatic pancreatic cancer after previous gemcitabine-based therapy (NAPOLI-1): a global, randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial

    Andrea Wang-Gillam;Chung-Pin Li;György Bodoky;Andrew Dean

  • EGF Receptor is Required for KRAS-induced Pancreatic Tumorigenesis

    Christine M. Ardito;Barbara M. Grüner;Kenneth K. Takeuchi;Clara Lubeseder-Martellato

  • Pancreatic Cancer: Basic and Clinical Aspects

    Günter Schneider;Jens T. Siveke;Florian Eckel;Roland M. Schmid

  • Cutting Edge: T Helper 1 and T Helper 2 Cells Respond Differentially to Chemokines

    Jens T. Siveke;Alf Hamann

  • Combined inhibition of BET family proteins and histone deacetylases as a potential epigenetics-based therapy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

    Pawel K Mazur;Alexander Herner;Stephano S Mello;Matthias Wirth

  • NAPOLI-1 phase 3 study of liposomal irinotecan in metastatic pancreatic cancer: Final overall survival analysis and characteristics of long-term survivors.

    Andrea Wang-Gillam;Richard A. Hubner;Jens T. Siveke;Daniel D. Von Hoff

  • Notch2 is required for progression of pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia and development of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

    Pawel K. Mazur;Henrik Einwächter;Marcel Lee;Bence Sipos

  • Liver-specific inactivation of Notch2, but not Notch1, compromises intrahepatic bile duct development in mice.

    Fabian Geisler;Florian Nagl;Pawel K. Mazur;Marcel Lee

  • [S3-guideline exocrine pancreatic cancer].

    T. Seufferlein;M. Porzner;T. Becker;V. Budach

  • Th1/Th2 subsets: distinct differences in homing and chemokine receptor expression?

    Uta Syrbe;Jens Siveke;Alf Hamann

  • Tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases (TIMP)‐1 creates a premetastatic niche in the liver through SDF‐1/CXCR4‐dependent neutrophil recruitment in mice

    Bastian Seubert;Barbara Grünwald;Julia Kobuch;Haissi Cui

  • RIG-I-like helicases induce immunogenic cell death of pancreatic cancer cells and sensitize tumors toward killing by CD8(+) T cells.

    P Duewell;A Steger;H Lohr;H Bourhis

  • Comprehensive Genomic and Transcriptomic Analysis for Guiding Therapeutic Decisions in Patients with Rare Cancers

    Peter Horak;Christoph Heining;Simon Kreutzfeldt;Barbara Hutter

  • Notch Signaling Is Required for Exocrine Regeneration After Acute Pancreatitis

    Jens T Siveke;Clara Lubeseder-Martellato;Marcel Lee;Pawel K Mazur

  • The Latest Developments in Imaging of Fibroblast Activation Protein

    Annette Altmann;Annette Altmann;Uwe A. Haberkorn;Jens Siveke

  • Concomitant pancreatic activation of Kras(G12D) and Tgfa results in cystic papillary neoplasms reminiscent of human IPMN.

    Jens T. Siveke;Henrik Einwächter;Bence Sipos;Clara Lubeseder-Martellato

  • Intraductal papillary neoplasms of the bile duct: stepwise progression to carcinoma involves common molecular pathways

    Anna Melissa Schlitter;Diana Born;Marcus Bettstetter;Katja Specht

  • Lineage fate of ductular reactions in liver injury and carcinogenesis

    S Jörs;P Jeliazkova;M Ringelhan;J Thalhammer

  • Chemokine Receptor CCR1 But Not CCR5 Mediates Leukocyte Recruitment and Subsequent Renal Fibrosis after Unilateral Ureteral Obstruction

    Vaclav Eis;Bruno Luckow;Volker Vielhauer;Jens T. Siveke

  • Origin of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma from atypical flat lesions: a comparative study in transgenic mice and human tissues

    Michaela Aichler;Christopher Seiler;Monica Tost;Jens Siveke

Frequent Co-Authors

Roland M. Schmid
Roland M. Schmid Technical University of Munich
Irene Esposito
Irene Esposito Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf
Volker Heinemann
Volker Heinemann Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Bence Sipos
Bence Sipos University of Tübingen
David Cunningham
David Cunningham Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust
Daniel D. Von Hoff
Daniel D. Von Hoff Translational Genomics Research Institute
Ernst J. Rummeny
Ernst J. Rummeny Technical University of Munich
Wilko Weichert
Wilko Weichert Technical University of Munich
Axel Walch
Axel Walch Technical University of Munich
Mathias Heikenwalder
Mathias Heikenwalder German Cancer Research Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Biology and Biochemistry in the USA opens up numerous pathways in the healthcare sector, especially with the rise of flexible online education options. Students looking to blend biological knowledge with data analysis may consider affordable online him programs to pursue careers in Health Information Management. This field is rapidly growing due to the increasing reliance on digital health records.

For those eager to dig deeper into biological processes and human health, pursuing an online master's degree in nutrition can lead to roles in healthcare, research, or the food industry. If clinical lab technology interests you, online ultrasound tech school programs offer a pathway to diagnostic imaging careers.

Additionally, if you’re seeking a quick entry point to the health sciences workforce, 1 year radiology tech programs online present opportunities to start working in medical imaging within a short timeframe. These diverse online programs make it easier to tailor your academic journey to your interests and career goals in health and biosciences.

Best Scientists Citing Jens T. Siveke

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles