World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Economics and Finance

D-Index
68
Citations
35983
World Ranking
502
National Ranking
330

John Bound publication distribution in Economics and Finance in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Economics and Finance in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John Bound sits on this spectrum.

42–46 publications: 1 scientists 47–51 publications: 12 scientists 52–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–61 publications: 23 scientists 62–66 publications: 32 scientists 67–71 publications: 36 scientists 72–76 publications: 56 scientists 77–81 publications: 57 scientists 82–86 publications: 70 scientists 87–91 publications: 86 scientists 92–96 publications: 72 scientists 97–101 publications: 106 scientists 102–106 publications: 97 scientists 107–111 publications: 96 scientists 112–116 publications: 101 scientists 117–121 publications: 103 scientists 122–126 publications: 102 scientists 127–131 publications: 108 scientists 132–136 publications: 107 scientists 137–141 publications: 111 scientists 142–146 publications: 94 scientists 147–151 publications: 96 scientists 152–156 publications: 100 scientists 157–161 publications: 74 scientists 162–166 publications: 68 scientists 167–171 publications: 91 scientists 172–176 publications: 76 scientists 177–181 publications: 75 scientists 182–186 publications: 61 scientists 187–191 publications: 66 scientists 192–196 publications: 68 scientists 197–201 publications: 71 scientists 202–206 publications: 60 scientists 207–211 publications: 56 scientists 212–216 publications: 44 scientists 217–221 publications: 51 scientists 222–226 publications: 65 scientists 227–231 publications: 48 scientists 232–236 publications: 59 scientists 237–241 publications: 37 scientists 242–246 publications: 37 scientists 247–251 publications: 41 scientists 252–256 publications: 43 scientists 257–261 publications: 33 scientists 262–266 publications: 34 scientists 267–271 publications: 39 scientists 272–276 publications: 25 scientists 277–281 publications: 29 scientists 282–286 publications: 29 scientists 287–291 publications: 26 scientists 292–296 publications: 31 scientists 297–301 publications: 31 scientists 302–306 publications: 24 scientists 307–311 publications: 28 scientists 312–316 publications: 24 scientists 317–321 publications: 13 scientists 322–326 publications: 14 scientists 327–331 publications: 25 scientists 332–336 publications: 18 scientists 337–341 publications: 16 scientists 342–346 publications: 18 scientists 347–351 publications: 15 scientists 352–356 publications: 17 scientists 357–361 publications: 19 scientists 362–366 publications: 16 scientists 367–371 publications: 17 scientists 372–376 publications: 7 scientists 377–381 publications: 18 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 19 scientists 392–396 publications: 9 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 13 scientists 407–411 publications: 13 scientists 412–416 publications: 5 scientists 417–421 publications: 10 scientists 422–426 publications: 6 scientists 427–431 publications: 12 scientists 432–436 publications: 9 scientists 437–441 publications: 9 scientists 442–446 publications: 10 scientists 447–451 publications: 12 scientists 452–456 publications: 8 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 4 scientists 472–476 publications: 5 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 7 scientists 487–491 publications: 8 scientists 492–496 publications: 5 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 4 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 7 scientists 517–520 publications: 7 scientists 521+ publications: 99 scientists
42 publications 521+

This scientist: 143 publications — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 521 publications or more.

John Bound D-index placement in Economics and Finance in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Economics and Finance scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John Bound sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 126 scientists 31 D-Index: 147 scientists 32 D-Index: 157 scientists 33 D-Index: 178 scientists 34 D-Index: 171 scientists 35 D-Index: 141 scientists 36 D-Index: 132 scientists 37 D-Index: 129 scientists 38 D-Index: 130 scientists 39 D-Index: 120 scientists 40 D-Index: 117 scientists 41 D-Index: 113 scientists 42 D-Index: 114 scientists 43 D-Index: 97 scientists 44 D-Index: 115 scientists 45 D-Index: 86 scientists 46 D-Index: 78 scientists 47 D-Index: 83 scientists 48 D-Index: 62 scientists 49 D-Index: 74 scientists 50 D-Index: 50 scientists 51 D-Index: 66 scientists 52 D-Index: 69 scientists 53 D-Index: 55 scientists 54 D-Index: 67 scientists 55 D-Index: 61 scientists 56 D-Index: 62 scientists 57 D-Index: 45 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 47 scientists 60 D-Index: 46 scientists 61 D-Index: 36 scientists 62 D-Index: 37 scientists 63 D-Index: 56 scientists 64 D-Index: 50 scientists 65 D-Index: 32 scientists 66 D-Index: 28 scientists 67 D-Index: 30 scientists 68 D-Index: 24 scientists 69 D-Index: 25 scientists 70 D-Index: 22 scientists 71 D-Index: 21 scientists 72 D-Index: 26 scientists 73 D-Index: 24 scientists 74 D-Index: 23 scientists 75 D-Index: 12 scientists 76 D-Index: 14 scientists 77 D-Index: 15 scientists 78 D-Index: 15 scientists 79 D-Index: 17 scientists 80 D-Index: 17 scientists 81 D-Index: 11 scientists 82 D-Index: 10 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 11 scientists 85 D-Index: 5 scientists 86 D-Index: 9 scientists 87 D-Index: 13 scientists 88 D-Index: 9 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 6 scientists 91 D-Index: 4 scientists 92 D-Index: 8 scientists 93 D-Index: 10 scientists 94 D-Index: 11 scientists 95 D-Index: 6 scientists 96 D-Index: 4 scientists 97 D-Index: 4 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100 D-Index: 8 scientists 101+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 101+

This scientist: 68 D-Index — 87th percentile

87% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 101 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2004 - Fellows of the Econometric Society

Overview

John Bound is affiliated with the University of Michigan-Ann Arbor in the United States. Their research focus broadly spans social sciences, with significant contributions to the fields of political science and international relations, education, general health professions, health, and obstetrics and gynecology.

The main topics addressed in their work include:

  • Higher Education Governance and Development
  • Health disparities and outcomes
  • Higher Education Research Studies
  • Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations
  • Global Health Care Issues
  • Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
  • Employment and Welfare Studies

John Bound's research has appeared in a variety of publication venues, with frequent contributions to:

  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Deep Blue (University of Michigan)
  • The Journal of Economic Perspectives
  • American Economic Journal Economic Policy
  • American Journal of Preventive Medicine

Some of the recent papers published by John Bound include:

  • The Globalization of Postsecondary Education: The Role of International Students in the US Higher Education System (2021), published in The Journal of Economic Perspectives
  • A Passage to America: University Funding and International Students (2020), published in American Economic Journal Economic Policy

Frequent collaborators in their scholarly work include:

  • Arline T. Geronimus
  • Breno Braga
  • Gaurav Khanna
  • Sarah Turner
  • Javier M. Rodríguez

John Bound has been recognized as a Fellow of the Econometric Society since 2004.

Best Publications

  • Problems with Instrumental Variables Estimation when the Correlation between the Instruments and the Endogenous Explanatory Variable is Weak

    John Bound;David A. Jaeger;Regina M. Baker

  • Changes in the Demand for Skilled Labor within U. S. Manufacturing: Evidence from the Annual Survey of Manufactures

    Eli Berman;John Bound;Zvi Griliches

  • Implications of Skill-Biased Technological Change: International Evidence

    Eli Berman;John Bound;Stephen J Machin

  • Changes in the structure of wages in the 1980's: an evaluation of alternative explanations.

    John Bound;George E Johnson

  • Measurement error in survey data

    John Bound;Charles Brown;Nancy Mathiowetz

  • Who Does R&D and Who Patents?

    John Bound;Clint Cummins;Zvi Griliches;Bronwyn H. Hall

  • Self-Reported versus Objective Measures of Health in Retirement Models

    John Bound

  • Why Have College Completion Rates Declined? An Analysis of Changing Student Preparation and Collegiate Resources

    John Bound;Michael F. Lovenheim;Sarah Turner

  • The Extent of Measurement Error in Longitudinal Earnings Data: Do Two Wrongs Make a Right?

    John Bound;Alan B. Krueger

  • Economic analysis of transfer programs targeted on people with disabilities

    John Bound;Richard V. Burkhauser

  • The dynamic effects of health on the labor force transitions of older workers

    John Bound;Michael Schoenbaum;Todd R. Stinebrickner;Timothy Waidmann

  • The health and earnings of rejected disability insurance applicants.

    John Bound

  • What Went Wrong? The Erosion of Relative Earnings and Employment Among Young Black Men in the 1980s

    John Bound;Richard B. Freeman

  • Demand Shifts, Population Adjustments, and Labor Market Outcomes during the 1980s

    John Bound;Harry J. Holzer

  • Changes in the Demand for Skilled Labor within U.S. Manufacturing Industries: Evidence from the Annual Survey of Manufacturing

    Eli Berman;John Bound;Zvi Griliches

  • Use of Census-based Aggregate Variables to Proxy for Socioeconomic Group: Evidence from National Samples

    Arline T. Geronimus;John Bound

  • Accounting for the Black-White Wealth Gap: A Nonparametric Approach

    Robert Barsky;John Bound;Kerwin Kofi Charles;Joseph P. Lupton

  • Evidence on the Validity of Cross-Sectional and Longitudinal Labor Market Data

    John Bound;Charles Brown;Greg J. Duncan;Willard L. Rodgers

  • Excess Mortality among Blacks and Whites in the United States

    Arline T. Geronimus;John Bound;John Bound;Timothy A. Waidmann;Marianne M. Hillemeier

  • Implications of Skill-Biased Technological Change

    S Machin;E Berman;J Bound

Frequent Co-Authors

Arline T. Geronimus
Arline T. Geronimus University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Zvi Griliches
Zvi Griliches Harvard University
Harry J. Holzer
Harry J. Holzer Georgetown University
Susanna Loeb
Susanna Loeb Brown University
Bronwyn H. Hall
Bronwyn H. Hall University of California, Berkeley
Alan B. Krueger
Alan B. Krueger Princeton University
Richard V. Burkhauser
Richard V. Burkhauser Cornell University
Greg J. Duncan
Greg J. Duncan University of California, Irvine
Kerwin Kofi Charles
Kerwin Kofi Charles Yale University
Bridget Terry Long
Bridget Terry Long Harvard University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

As you explore Economics and Finance in the USA, consider how related online degrees can broaden your career options. Today’s job market increasingly values interdisciplinary knowledge, and programs in business, management, HR, and communications can complement your finance expertise.

For those seeking leadership or analytical roles, an cheapest aacsb online mba no gmat offers a cost-effective, flexible way to develop business management skills. Specializing further, a human resources masters can prepare you for talent management or organizational strategy roles—vital in large financial firms.

Strong communication is essential in finance careers. A masters in communication online equips graduates to translate complex data for diverse audiences, enhancing employability in consulting, banking, or investor relations.

Lastly, those drawn to leadership and implementation might explore a project management online degree. This pathway opens doors to coordinating financial projects, mergers, or cross-department initiatives.

Best Scientists Citing John Bound

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles