World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
69
Citations
17974
World Ranking
1982
National Ranking
1002

Stacy Marsella publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stacy Marsella sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 290 publications — 72nd percentile

72% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Stacy Marsella D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stacy Marsella sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 69 D-Index — 87th percentile

87% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Stacy Marsella is affiliated with Northeastern University in the United States. Their research spans multiple disciplines, primarily focusing on computer science and psychology. Within these fields, they have contributed extensively to subfields such as artificial intelligence, sociology and political science, social psychology, human-computer interaction, and computer vision and pattern recognition.

Their work addresses a diverse range of topics, including hearing impairment and communication, hand gesture recognition systems, disaster management and resilience, evacuation and crowd dynamics, topic modeling, virtual reality applications and impacts, as well as misinformation and its impacts.

Marsella has published research in various academic venues with notable frequency. Key publication outlets include:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • AHFE international
  • Frontiers in Robotics and AI
  • CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
  • Advanced Engineering Informatics

Recent papers authored or coauthored by Marsella demonstrate a focus on augmented reality, trust dynamics in information seeking, persuasive conversational systems, supply chain decision-making, and emotional expression by machines. Selected recent publications include:

  • "Exploring augmented reality for worker assistance versus training," 2021, Advanced Engineering Informatics
  • "Shifting Trust: Examining How Trust and Distrust Emerge, Transform, and Collapse in COVID-19 Information Seeking," 2022, CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
  • "Designing Persuasive Food Conversational Recommender Systems With Nudging and Socially-Aware Conversational Strategies," 2022, Frontiers in Robotics and AI
  • "Effects of trust-based decision making in disrupted supply chains," 2020, PLoS ONE
  • "Social Functions of Machine Emotional Expressions," 2023, Proceedings of the IEEE

Frequent collaborators of Marsella include researchers with whom they have coauthored multiple papers. These frequent coauthors are:

  • Nutchanon Yongsatianchot
  • Jacqueline Griffin
  • Nikolos Gurney
  • Parisa Ghanad Torshizi
  • Yixuan Zhang

Best Publications

  • Emotional Expressions Reconsidered: Challenges to Inferring Emotion From Human Facial Movements:

    Lisa Feldman Barrett;Ralph Adolphs;Stacy Marsella;Stacy Marsella;Aleix M. Martinez

  • A domain-independent framework for modeling emotion

    Jonathan Gratch;Stacy Marsella

  • Towards a common framework for multimodal generation : The behavior markup language

    Stefan Kopp;Brigitte Krenn;Stacy Marsella;Andrew N. Marshall

  • SimSensei kiosk: a virtual human interviewer for healthcare decision support

    David DeVault;Ron Artstein;Grace Benn;Teresa Dey

  • EMA: A process model of appraisal dynamics

    Stacy C. Marsella;Jonathan Gratch

  • Taming decentralized POMDPs: towards efficient policy computation for multiagent settings

    R. Nair;M. Tambe;M. Yokoo;D. Pynadath

  • The Distress Analysis Interview Corpus of human and computer interviews

    Jonathan Gratch;Ron Artstein;Gale Lucas;Giota stratou

  • SmartBody: behavior realization for embodied conversational agents

    Marcus Thiebaux;Stacy Marsella;Andrew N. Marshall;Marcelo Kallmann

  • Tears and fears: modeling emotions and emotional behaviors in synthetic agents

    Jonathan Gratch;Stacy Marsella

  • Interactive pedagogical drama

    Stacy C. Marsella;W. Lewis Johnson;Catherine LaBore

  • Toward virtual humans

    William Swartout;Jonathan Gratch;Randall W. Hill;Eduard Hovy

  • Toward the holodeck: integrating graphics, sound, character and story

    R. Hill;J. Gratch;W. L. Johnson;C. Kyriakakis

  • The Behavior Markup Language: Recent Developments and Challenges

    Hannes Vilhjálmsson;Nathan Cantelmo;Justine Cassell;Nicolas E. Chafai

  • Virtual rapport

    Jonathan Gratch;Anna Okhmatovskaia;Francois Lamothe;Stacy Marsella

  • Toward a new generation of virtual humans for interactive experiences

    J. Rickel;S. Marsella;J. Gratch;R. Hill

  • Serious Games for Language Learning: How Much Game, How Much AI?

    W. Lewis Johnson;Hannes Vilhjalmsson;Stacy Marsella

  • Nonverbal behavior generator for embodied conversational agents

    Jina Lee;Stacy Marsella

  • ESCAPES: evacuation simulation with children, authorities, parents, emotions, and social comparison

    Jason Tsai;Natalie Fridman;Emma Bowring;Matthew Brown

  • All Together Now

    Arno Hartholt;David Traum;Stacy C. Marsella;Ari Shapiro

  • Evaluating a Computational Model of Emotion

    Jonathan Gratch;Stacy Marsella

  • Computational Models of Emotion

    Stacy C. Marsella;Jonathan Gratch;Paola Petta

Frequent Co-Authors

Jonathan Gratch
Jonathan Gratch University of Southern California
David V. Pynadath
David V. Pynadath University of Southern California
Milind Tambe
Milind Tambe Harvard University
David Traum
David Traum University of Southern California
William R. Swartout
William R. Swartout University of Southern California
Louis-Philippe Morency
Louis-Philippe Morency Carnegie Mellon University
Albert Rizzo
Albert Rizzo University of Southern California
Gal A. Kaminka
Gal A. Kaminka Bar-Ilan University
Lynn C. Miller
Lynn C. Miller University of Southern California

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Computer Science in the USA can open doors to a wide range of interdisciplinary career paths. Many students find that skills gained from computer science are also highly valued in related fields such as criminal justice, accounting, data science, and construction management.

If you’re looking to broaden your expertise, consider supplementing your studies with programs like the cheapest online criminal justice degrees. These can help you combine technical skills with an understanding of legal systems, making you well-suited for roles in cybersecurity or digital forensics.

For those interested in finance and analytics, online accounting degree programs are an excellent way to pair computational expertise with financial acumen. Meanwhile, pursuing an online data science degree allows students to specialize in big data, machine learning, and predictive analytics—skills increasingly in demand by employers.

Additionally, the online building construction degree offers chief insights into project management and technology adoption in the construction industry, which is rapidly digitizing. Together, these pathways can complement a computer science degree, helping you diversify your skills and career opportunities.

Best Scientists Citing Stacy Marsella

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles