World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Mathematics

D-Index
36
Citations
12089
World Ranking
2575
National Ranking
170

Steven A. Julious publication distribution in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mathematics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Steven A. Julious sits on this spectrum.

42–46 publications: 3 scientists 47–51 publications: 5 scientists 52–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–61 publications: 20 scientists 62–66 publications: 14 scientists 67–71 publications: 25 scientists 72–76 publications: 19 scientists 77–81 publications: 35 scientists 82–86 publications: 50 scientists 87–91 publications: 60 scientists 92–96 publications: 86 scientists 97–101 publications: 84 scientists 102–106 publications: 83 scientists 107–111 publications: 90 scientists 112–116 publications: 99 scientists 117–121 publications: 90 scientists 122–126 publications: 91 scientists 127–131 publications: 109 scientists 132–136 publications: 110 scientists 137–141 publications: 98 scientists 142–146 publications: 112 scientists 147–151 publications: 102 scientists 152–156 publications: 88 scientists 157–161 publications: 106 scientists 162–166 publications: 83 scientists 167–171 publications: 102 scientists 172–176 publications: 77 scientists 177–181 publications: 81 scientists 182–186 publications: 78 scientists 187–191 publications: 71 scientists 192–196 publications: 92 scientists 197–201 publications: 64 scientists 202–206 publications: 69 scientists 207–211 publications: 64 scientists 212–216 publications: 62 scientists 217–221 publications: 58 scientists 222–226 publications: 53 scientists 227–231 publications: 50 scientists 232–236 publications: 46 scientists 237–241 publications: 46 scientists 242–246 publications: 46 scientists 247–251 publications: 43 scientists 252–256 publications: 29 scientists 257–261 publications: 45 scientists 262–266 publications: 30 scientists 267–271 publications: 33 scientists 272–276 publications: 34 scientists 277–281 publications: 30 scientists 282–286 publications: 31 scientists 287–291 publications: 21 scientists 292–296 publications: 34 scientists 297–301 publications: 26 scientists 302–306 publications: 10 scientists 307–311 publications: 17 scientists 312–316 publications: 23 scientists 317–321 publications: 13 scientists 322–326 publications: 16 scientists 327–331 publications: 26 scientists 332–336 publications: 13 scientists 337–341 publications: 13 scientists 342–346 publications: 16 scientists 347–351 publications: 17 scientists 352–356 publications: 12 scientists 357–361 publications: 18 scientists 362–366 publications: 18 scientists 367–371 publications: 9 scientists 372–376 publications: 11 scientists 377–381 publications: 8 scientists 382–386 publications: 8 scientists 387–391 publications: 9 scientists 392–396 publications: 9 scientists 397–401 publications: 8 scientists 402–406 publications: 11 scientists 407–411 publications: 6 scientists 412–416 publications: 6 scientists 417–421 publications: 9 scientists 422–426 publications: 8 scientists 427–431 publications: 5 scientists 432–436 publications: 8 scientists 437–441 publications: 8 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 4 scientists 452–456 publications: 4 scientists 457–461 publications: 2 scientists 462–466 publications: 2 scientists 467–471 publications: 4 scientists 472–476 publications: 3 scientists 477–481 publications: 3 scientists 482–486 publications: 6 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 5 scientists 497–501 publications: 5 scientists 502–506 publications: 1 scientists 507–511 publications: 6 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 1 scientists 522–526 publications: 3 scientists 527–531 publications: 1 scientists 532–536 publications: 4 scientists 537+ publications: 100 scientists
42 publications 537+

This scientist: 171 publications — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 537 publications or more.

Steven A. Julious D-index placement in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mathematics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Steven A. Julious sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 174 scientists 31 D-Index: 151 scientists 32 D-Index: 174 scientists 33 D-Index: 117 scientists 34 D-Index: 136 scientists 35 D-Index: 127 scientists 36 D-Index: 145 scientists 37 D-Index: 153 scientists 38 D-Index: 150 scientists 39 D-Index: 150 scientists 40 D-Index: 138 scientists 41 D-Index: 136 scientists 42 D-Index: 93 scientists 43 D-Index: 108 scientists 44 D-Index: 115 scientists 45 D-Index: 112 scientists 46 D-Index: 103 scientists 47 D-Index: 75 scientists 48 D-Index: 59 scientists 49 D-Index: 67 scientists 50 D-Index: 60 scientists 51 D-Index: 57 scientists 52 D-Index: 59 scientists 53 D-Index: 62 scientists 54 D-Index: 60 scientists 55 D-Index: 50 scientists 56 D-Index: 42 scientists 57 D-Index: 54 scientists 58 D-Index: 50 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 41 scientists 61 D-Index: 35 scientists 62 D-Index: 40 scientists 63 D-Index: 21 scientists 64 D-Index: 31 scientists 65 D-Index: 27 scientists 66 D-Index: 29 scientists 67 D-Index: 19 scientists 68 D-Index: 25 scientists 69 D-Index: 17 scientists 70 D-Index: 18 scientists 71 D-Index: 12 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 13 scientists 74 D-Index: 18 scientists 75 D-Index: 9 scientists 76 D-Index: 11 scientists 77 D-Index: 10 scientists 78 D-Index: 9 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 10 scientists 82 D-Index: 5 scientists 83 D-Index: 5 scientists 84 D-Index: 13 scientists 85 D-Index: 6 scientists 86+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 86+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 86 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Sample size of 12 per group rule of thumb for a pilot study

    Steven A. Julious

  • Estimating the sample size for a pilot randomised trial to minimise the overall trial sample size for the external pilot and main trial for a continuous outcome variable

    Amy L Whitehead;Steven A Julious;Cindy L Cooper;Michael J Campbell

  • An audit of sample sizes for pilot and feasibility trials being undertaken in the United Kingdom registered in the United Kingdom Clinical Research Network database

    Sophie A M Billingham;Amy L Whitehead;Steven A Julious

  • Sample sizes for clinical trials with normal data.

    Steven A. Julious

  • Estimating sample sizes for binary, ordered categorical, and continuous outcomes in two group comparisons

    M J Campbell;S A Julious;D G Altman

  • Recruitment and retention of participants in randomised controlled trials: a review of trials funded and published by the United Kingdom Health Technology Assessment Programme.

    Stephen J Walters;Inês Bonacho Dos Anjos Henriques-Cadby;Oscar Bortolami;Laura Flight

  • The statistical interpretation of pilot trials: should significance thresholds be reconsidered?

    Ellen C Lee;Amy L Whitehead;Richard M Jacques;Steven A Julious

  • A reinvestigation of recruitment to randomised, controlled, multicenter trials: a review of trials funded by two UK funding agencies

    Ben G O Sully;Steven A Julious;Jon Nicholl

  • DELTA2 guidance on choosing the target difference and undertaking and reporting the sample size calculation for a randomised controlled trial

    Jonathan A. Cook;Steven A. Julious;William Sones;Lisa V. Hampson;Lisa V. Hampson

  • Sample Sizes for Clinical Trials

    Steven A. Julious

  • Guidance for using pilot studies to inform the design of intervention trials with continuous outcomes

    Melanie L Bell;Amy L Whitehead;Steven A Julious

  • Using confidence intervals around individual means to assess statistical significance between two means

    Steven A. Julious

  • Computer Therapy Compared With Usual Care for People With Long-Standing Aphasia Poststroke A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial

    Rebecca Palmer;Pam Enderby;Cindy Cooper;Nick Latimer

  • Self-managed, computerised speech and language therapy for patients with chronic aphasia post-stroke compared with usual care or attention control (Big CACTUS): a multicentre, single-blinded, randomised controlled trial.

    Rebecca Palmer;Munyaradzi Dimairo;Cindy L. Cooper;Pam Enderby

  • DELTA2 guidance on choosing the target difference and undertaking and reporting the sample size calculation for a randomised controlled trial

    Jonathan A Cook;Steven A Julious;William Sones;Lisa V Hampson;Lisa V Hampson

  • Why do we continue to use standardized mortality ratios for small area comparisons

    Steven A. Julious;Jon Nicholl;Steve George

  • Measurement in clinical trials: a neglected issue for statisticians?

    Stephen Senn;Steven Julious

  • The Adaptive designs CONSORT Extension (ACE) statement: a checklist with explanation and elaboration guideline for reporting randomised trials that use an adaptive design

    Munyaradzi Dimairo;Philip Pallmann;James Wason;James Wason;Susan Todd

  • Two‐sided confidence intervals for the single proportion: comparison of seven methods by Robert G. Newcombe, Statistics in Medicine 1998; 17:857–872

    Steven A. Julious

  • Practical guide to sample size calculations: non-inferiority and equivalence trials

    Laura Flight;Steven A. Julious

Frequent Co-Authors

Michael J. Campbell
Michael J. Campbell University of Sheffield
Jon Nicholl
Jon Nicholl University of Sheffield
Dean Fergusson
Dean Fergusson Ottawa Hospital
Douglas G. Altman
Douglas G. Altman University of Oxford
Richard Emsley
Richard Emsley King's College London
Luke Vale
Luke Vale Newcastle University
Alan Brennan
Alan Brennan University of Sheffield
Pam Enderby
Pam Enderby University of Sheffield
Thomas Jaki
Thomas Jaki University of Regensburg
Nigel Stallard
Nigel Stallard University of Warwick

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students studying Mathematics in the USA, exploring related online degrees can expand career opportunities significantly. Many graduates consider advanced programs like the shortest online MBA to quickly gain valuable business and management skills alongside their analytical expertise.

Meanwhile, those interested in applying their mathematical skills to market trends and consumer behavior might pursue marketing graduate programs. These programs offer a cost-effective path to lucrative careers that blend quantitative analysis with strategic decision-making.

Time is often a critical factor for working professionals, making 1 year MBA programs in USA highly appealing. Such accelerated options allow students to complete their studies efficiently and reenter the workforce quickly with enhanced credentials.

Additionally, flexibility is key in today’s education landscape. Many students wonder, can you transfer MBA programs? The ability to transfer credits between institutions can save time and resources, making it easier to tailor degree plans to individual needs.

Best Scientists Citing Steven A. Julious

Recently Published Articles