World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
51
Citations
10831
World Ranking
5208
National Ranking
547

Pam Enderby publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Pam Enderby sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 214 publications — 73rd percentile

73% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Pam Enderby D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Pam Enderby sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 51 D-Index — 56th percentile

56% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Pam Enderby is affiliated with the University of Sheffield in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily spans the domain of medicine, with a strong focus on rehabilitation, cognitive neuroscience, epidemiology, public health, environmental and occupational health, and general health professions.

The main topics addressed in their work include:

  • Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
  • Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
  • Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
  • Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
  • Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues

Enderby's research has been published in multiple scientific venues. The most frequent publication venues are:

  • Stroke
  • Disability and Rehabilitation
  • Frontiers in Neurology
  • Health Technology Assessment
  • International Journal of Stroke

Several recent papers illustrate the scope of their research contributions. These include:

  • "Predictors of Poststroke Aphasia Recovery" (2021) published in Stroke
  • "Impact of COVID-19 on the Speech and Language Therapy Profession and Their Patients" (2021) published in Frontiers in Neurology
  • "Computerised speech and language therapy or attention control added to usual care for people with long-term post-stroke aphasia: the Big CACTUS three-arm RCT" (2020) published in Health Technology Assessment
  • "Precision rehabilitation for aphasia by patient age, sex, aphasia severity, and time since stroke? A prespecified, systematic review-based, individual participant data, network, subgroup meta-analysis" (2022) published in International Journal of Stroke
  • "Complex speech-language therapy interventions for stroke-related aphasia: the RELEASE study incorporating a systematic review and individual participant data network meta-analysis" (2022) published in Health and Social Care Delivery Research

Enderby has collaborated frequently with a number of coauthors, notably:

  • Rebecca Palmer (8 joint publications)
  • Audrey Bowen (6 joint publications)
  • Marian Brady (6 joint publications)
  • Katie Chadd (5 joint publications)
  • Myzoon Ali (4 joint publications)

Best Publications

  • Speech and language therapy for aphasia following stroke

    Marian C. Brady;Helen Kelly;John Godwin;Pam Enderby

  • Frenchay Dysarthria Assessment

    Pamela M. Enderby

  • Aphasia after stroke: natural history and associated deficits.

    D T Wade;R L Hewer;R M David;P M Enderby

  • Barriers and facilitators to the use of high-technology augmentative and alternative communication devices: a systematic review and qualitative synthesis.

    Susan Baxter;Pam Enderby;Pam Enderby;Philippa Evans;Simon Judge

  • The Frenchay Aphasia Screening Test: a short, simple test for aphasia appropriate for non-specialists.

    Pamela M. Enderby;Victorine A. Wood;Derick T. Wade;Richard Langton Hewer

  • Towards a More Inclusive Vision of Dementia Care Practice and Research

    Mike Nolan;Tony Ryan;Pam Enderby;David Reid

  • Randomised controlled trial of community based speech and language therapy in preschool children

    Margaret Glogowska;Sue Roulstone;Pam Enderby;Tim J Peters

  • Treatment of acquired aphasia: speech therapists and volunteers compared.

    Rachel David;Pam Enderby;David Bainton

  • Computer Therapy Compared With Usual Care for People With Long-Standing Aphasia Poststroke A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial

    Rebecca Palmer;Pam Enderby;Cindy Cooper;Nick Latimer

  • The association between delays in screening for and assessing dysphagia after acute stroke, and the risk of stroke-associated pneumonia

    Benjamin David Bray;Craig J. Smith;Geoffrey C Cloud;P Enderby

  • Stammering and therapy views of people who stammer.

    Rosemarie Hayhow;Anne Marie Cray;Pam Enderby

  • A core outcome set for aphasia treatment research: The ROMA consensus statement:

    Sarah J. Wallace;Linda Worrall;Tanya Rose;Guylaine Le Dorze

  • Self-managed, computerised speech and language therapy for patients with chronic aphasia post-stroke compared with usual care or attention control (Big CACTUS): a multicentre, single-blinded, randomised controlled trial.

    Rebecca Palmer;Munyaradzi Dimairo;Cindy L. Cooper;Pam Enderby

  • Does speech and language therapy work? : a review of the literature

    Pamela M. Enderby;Joyce Emerson

  • Speech and language handicap: Towards knowing the size of the problem

    Pam Enderby;Robin Philipp

  • Pharmacological treatment for aphasia following stroke

    Jenny Greener;Pam Enderby;Renata Whurr

  • Proceedings of Patient Reported Outcome Measure’s (PROMs) Conference Sheffield 2016: advances in patient reported outcomes research

    Tim Croudace;John Brazier;Nils Gutacker;Andrew Street

  • Using the Senses Framework to achieve relationship-centred dementia care services A case example

    Tony Ryan;Mike Nolan;David Reid;Pam Enderby

  • Frenchay aphasia screening test (FAST) : test manual : a test for use by non-specialists to screen patients for the presence of aphasia

    Pamela M. Enderby;Victorine Wood;Derick T. Wade

  • Effect of piracetam on recovery and rehabilitation after stroke: a double-blind, placebo-controlled study.

    P Enderby;J Broeckx;W Hospers;F Schildermans

  • A randomized controlled trial to evaluate intensity of community-based rehabilitation provision following stroke or hip fracture in old age

    Tony Ryan;Pam Enderby;Alan S Rigby

  • A speech-controlled environmental control system for people with severe dysarthria.

    Mark S. Hawley;Pam Enderby;Phil Green;Stuart Cunningham;Stuart Cunningham

Frequent Co-Authors

Timothy J. Peters
Timothy J. Peters University of Bristol
Elizabeth Goyder
Elizabeth Goyder University of Sheffield
Steven A. Julious
Steven A. Julious University of Sheffield
Derick T Wade
Derick T Wade Oxford Brookes University
Miranda Rose
Miranda Rose La Trobe University
Linda Worrall
Linda Worrall University of Queensland
Marcus Meinzer
Marcus Meinzer Charité - University Medicine Berlin
Elizabeth Rochon
Elizabeth Rochon University of Toronto
Matthew A. Lambon Ralph
Matthew A. Lambon Ralph University of Cambridge
Katerina Hilari
Katerina Hilari City, University of London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in psychology opens the door to a wide array of career pathways. Many roles, such as mental health counselor, school counselor, and organizational psychologist, require advanced training and specialized education. Choosing the right program is essential for meeting state licensure requirements and targeting your career goals.

If you are interested in pursuing counseling, different regions offer top-tier educational opportunities. For example, you can explore the best college counseling programs in Cleveland, as well as the best college counseling programs in Georgia. The Midwest also offers high-quality programs, such as the best counseling program rankings in Iowa and the best counseling degree programs in Illinois.

When choosing an online program, consider factors like accreditation, faculty expertise, and internship opportunities. Selecting a top-ranked program can help set the foundation for a rewarding career in the rapidly growing field of psychology and counseling.

Best Scientists Citing Pam Enderby

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles