| Discipline name | D-Index | World Ranking | Current World Ranking | National Ranking | Current National Ranking | Publications | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 51 | 5208 | 4831 | 547 | 517 | 214 | 10831 |
The chart shows the history of publications by Pam Enderby between 1976 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Pam Enderby published across 50 years, from 1976 to 2025, averaging 5.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 27 publications in 2015. 7 of the 278 publications appeared in the last two years.
278 publications in total across all disciplines
| Year | Publications |
|---|---|
| 1976 | 1 |
| 1977 | 0 |
| 1978 | 0 |
| 1979 | 4 |
| 1980 | 1 |
| 1981 | 1 |
| 1982 | 1 |
| 1983 | 2 |
| 1984 | 4 |
| 1985 | 1 |
| 1986 | 5 |
| 1987 | 4 |
| 1988 | 1 |
| 1989 | 1 |
| 1990 | 3 |
| 1991 | 1 |
| 1992 | 3 |
| 1993 | 1 |
| 1994 | 4 |
| 1995 | 9 |
| 1996 | 4 |
| 1997 | 1 |
| 1998 | 4 |
| 1999 | 4 |
| 2000 | 9 |
| 2001 | 15 |
| 2002 | 6 |
| 2003 | 6 |
| 2004 | 10 |
| 2005 | 8 |
| 2006 | 12 |
| 2007 | 4 |
| 2008 | 7 |
| 2009 | 7 |
| 2010 | 8 |
| 2011 | 6 |
| 2012 | 12 |
| 2013 | 8 |
| 2014 | 4 |
| 2015 | 27 |
| 2016 | 18 |
| 2017 | 10 |
| 2018 | 7 |
| 2019 | 5 |
| 2020 | 11 |
| 2021 | 7 |
| 2022 | 3 |
| 2023 | 1 |
| 2024 | 3 |
| 2025 | 4 |
| Total | 278 |
The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Pam Enderby sits on this spectrum.
This scientist: 214 publications — 73rd percentile
73% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.
The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.
| Publications | Scientists | This scientist |
|---|---|---|
| 31–40 | 6 | |
| 41–50 | 52 | |
| 51–60 | 138 | |
| 61–70 | 299 | |
| 71–80 | 461 | |
| 81–90 | 605 | |
| 91–100 | 713 | |
| 101–110 | 736 | |
| 111–120 | 686 | |
| 121–130 | 670 | |
| 131–140 | 644 | |
| 141–150 | 597 | |
| 151–160 | 576 | |
| 161–170 | 477 | |
| 171–180 | 450 | |
| 181–190 | 397 | |
| 191–200 | 343 | |
| 201–210 | 328 | |
| 211–220 | 313 | 214 |
| 221–230 | 283 | |
| 231–240 | 226 | |
| 241–250 | 196 | |
| 251–260 | 201 | |
| 261–270 | 171 | |
| 271–280 | 151 | |
| 281–290 | 139 | |
| 291–300 | 113 | |
| 301–310 | 102 | |
| 311–320 | 100 | |
| 321–330 | 76 | |
| 331–340 | 92 | |
| 341–350 | 85 | |
| 351–360 | 69 | |
| 361–370 | 71 | |
| 371–380 | 63 | |
| 381–390 | 58 | |
| 391–400 | 57 | |
| 401–410 | 43 | |
| 411–420 | 33 | |
| 421–430 | 50 | |
| 431–440 | 41 | |
| 441–450 | 32 | |
| 451–460 | 27 | |
| 461–470 | 28 | |
| 471–480 | 25 | |
| 481–490 | 28 | |
| 491–500 | 20 | |
| 501–510 | 23 | |
| 511–520 | 26 | |
| 521–530 | 17 | |
| 531–540 | 21 | |
| 541–550 | 14 | |
| 551–560 | 16 | |
| 561–570 | 10 | |
| 571–580 | 22 | |
| 581–590 | 9 | |
| 591–600 | 14 | |
| 601–610 | 9 | |
| 611–620 | 11 | |
| 621–630 | 4 | |
| 631–640 | 7 | |
| 641–650 | 5 | |
| 651–660 | 10 | |
| 661–670 | 8 | |
| 671–680 | 8 | |
| 681–690 | 4 | |
| 691–700 | 3 | |
| 701–704 | 4 | |
| 705+ | 100 |
The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Pam Enderby sits on this spectrum.
This scientist: 51 D-Index — 56th percentile
56% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.
The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.
| D-Index | Scientists | This scientist |
|---|---|---|
| 30–31 | 398 | |
| 32–33 | 702 | |
| 34–35 | 671 | |
| 36–37 | 659 | |
| 38–39 | 641 | |
| 40–41 | 671 | |
| 42–43 | 617 | |
| 44–45 | 558 | |
| 46–47 | 495 | |
| 48–49 | 487 | |
| 50–51 | 445 | 51 |
| 52–53 | 390 | |
| 54–55 | 408 | |
| 56–57 | 345 | |
| 58–59 | 325 | |
| 60–61 | 321 | |
| 62–63 | 248 | |
| 64–65 | 290 | |
| 66–67 | 218 | |
| 68–69 | 219 | |
| 70–71 | 215 | |
| 72–73 | 183 | |
| 74–75 | 169 | |
| 76–77 | 132 | |
| 78–79 | 137 | |
| 80–81 | 120 | |
| 82–83 | 112 | |
| 84–85 | 86 | |
| 86–87 | 101 | |
| 88–89 | 83 | |
| 90–91 | 77 | |
| 92–93 | 70 | |
| 94–95 | 78 | |
| 96–97 | 58 | |
| 98–99 | 53 | |
| 100–101 | 57 | |
| 102–103 | 48 | |
| 104–105 | 53 | |
| 106–107 | 46 | |
| 108–109 | 24 | |
| 110–111 | 35 | |
| 112–113 | 27 | |
| 114–115 | 32 | |
| 116–117 | 31 | |
| 118–119 | 22 | |
| 120–121 | 16 | |
| 122–123 | 24 | |
| 124–125 | 18 | |
| 126–127 | 11 | |
| 128–129 | 19 | |
| 130–131 | 10 | |
| 132–133 | 16 | |
| 134–135 | 10 | |
| 136–137 | 12 | |
| 138–139 | 8 | |
| 140–141 | 5 | |
| 142–143 | 12 | |
| 144+ | 98 |
Pam Enderby is affiliated with the University of Sheffield in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily spans the domain of medicine, with a strong focus on rehabilitation, cognitive neuroscience, epidemiology, public health, environmental and occupational health, and general health professions.
The main topics addressed in their work include:
Enderby's research has been published in multiple scientific venues. The most frequent publication venues are:
Several recent papers illustrate the scope of their research contributions. These include:
Enderby has collaborated frequently with a number of coauthors, notably:
Marian C. Brady;Helen Kelly;John Godwin;Pam Enderby
Pamela M. Enderby
D T Wade;R L Hewer;R M David;P M Enderby
Susan Baxter;Pam Enderby;Pam Enderby;Philippa Evans;Simon Judge
Pamela M. Enderby;Victorine A. Wood;Derick T. Wade;Richard Langton Hewer
Mike Nolan;Tony Ryan;Pam Enderby;David Reid
Margaret Glogowska;Sue Roulstone;Pam Enderby;Tim J Peters
Rachel David;Pam Enderby;David Bainton
Rebecca Palmer;Pam Enderby;Cindy Cooper;Nick Latimer
Benjamin David Bray;Craig J. Smith;Geoffrey C Cloud;P Enderby
Rosemarie Hayhow;Anne Marie Cray;Pam Enderby
Sarah J. Wallace;Linda Worrall;Tanya Rose;Guylaine Le Dorze
Rebecca Palmer;Munyaradzi Dimairo;Cindy L. Cooper;Pam Enderby
Pamela M. Enderby;Joyce Emerson
Pam Enderby;Robin Philipp
Jenny Greener;Pam Enderby;Renata Whurr
Tim Croudace;John Brazier;Nils Gutacker;Andrew Street
Tony Ryan;Mike Nolan;David Reid;Pam Enderby
Pamela M. Enderby;Victorine Wood;Derick T. Wade
P Enderby;J Broeckx;W Hospers;F Schildermans
Tony Ryan;Pam Enderby;Alan S Rigby
Mark S. Hawley;Pam Enderby;Phil Green;Stuart Cunningham;Stuart Cunningham
If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.
Exploring online degrees in psychology opens the door to a wide array of career pathways. Many roles, such as mental health counselor, school counselor, and organizational psychologist, require advanced training and specialized education. Choosing the right program is essential for meeting state licensure requirements and targeting your career goals.
If you are interested in pursuing counseling, different regions offer top-tier educational opportunities. For example, you can explore the best college counseling programs in Cleveland, as well as the best college counseling programs in Georgia. The Midwest also offers high-quality programs, such as the best counseling program rankings in Iowa and the best counseling degree programs in Illinois.
When choosing an online program, consider factors like accreditation, faculty expertise, and internship opportunities. Selecting a top-ranked program can help set the foundation for a rewarding career in the rapidly growing field of psychology and counseling.
University of Illinois at Chicago
Tsinghua University
Case Western Reserve University
Institut de Ciència de Materials de Barcelona
École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne
University of Konstanz
Brock University
University of Pittsburgh
University of Hull
University of Bergen
University of Edinburgh
National Institute on Drug Abuse
John Innes Centre
Chinese University of Hong Kong
European Central Bank
Utrecht University