World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
35
Citations
4888
World Ranking
9898
National Ranking
5224

Camelia E. Hostinar publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Camelia E. Hostinar sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 71 publications — 5th percentile

5% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Camelia E. Hostinar D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Camelia E. Hostinar sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Camelia E. Hostinar is affiliated with the University of California, Davis in the United States. Their research spans diverse fields including psychology, neuroscience, and medicine, with significant contributions to clinical psychology and behavioral neuroscience.

The scientist's work extensively covers topics related to stress responses and cortisol, child and adolescent psychosocial and emotional development, heart rate variability and autonomic control, as well as neuroendocrine regulation and behavior. They have also contributed to understanding health, environment, cognitive aging, birth development, health, toxicology, and mutagenesis alongside research on tryptophan and brain disorders.

Frequent publication venues include:

  • Psychoneuroendocrinology
  • 2022 IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine (BIBM)
  • Development and Psychopathology
  • Brain Behavior and Immunity
  • Brain Behavior & Immunity - Health

Their recent notable papers include:

  • A review of mental health disparities during COVID-19: Evidence, mechanisms, and policy recommendations for promoting societal resilience (2022, Development and Psychopathology)
  • The Role of Childhood Executive Function in Explaining Income Disparities in Long-Term Academic Achievement (2020, Child Development)
  • Parenting matters: Parents can reduce or amplify children's anxiety and cortisol responses to acute stress (2020, Development and Psychopathology)
  • Associations between peripheral inflammation and resting state functional connectivity in adolescents (2021, Brain Behavior and Immunity)
  • Heart rate variability and circulating inflammatory markers in midlife (2021, Brain Behavior & Immunity - Health)

Collaborations have included work with researchers such as Anna M. Parenteau, LillyBelle K. Deer, Nicholas V. Alen, Sally Hang, and Paul D. Hastings.

Hostinar has also contributed to book literature, including a forthcoming work titled Stress in Childhood, published by Cambridge University Press and expected in 2025.

Best Publications

  • Psychobiological Mechanisms Underlying the Social Buffering of the Hypothalamic-Pituitary-Adrenocortical Axis: A Review of Animal Models and Human Studies Across Development

    Camelia E. Hostinar;Regina M. Sullivan;Megan R. Gunnar

  • Associations between early life adversity and executive function in children adopted internationally from orphanages.

    Camelia E. Hostinar;Sarah A. Stellern;Catherine Schaefer;Stephanie M. Carlson

  • Parent support is less effective in buffering cortisol stress reactivity for adolescents compared to children

    Camelia E. Hostinar;Anna E. Johnson;Megan R. Gunnar

  • The social buffering of the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenocortical axis in humans: Developmental and experiential determinants

    Megan R. Gunnar;Camelia E. Hostinar

  • Additive contributions of childhood adversity and recent stressors to inflammation at midlife: Findings from the MIDUS study

    Camelia E. Hostinar;Margie E. Lachman;Daniel K. Mroczek;Teresa E. Seeman

  • Future directions in the study of social relationships as regulators of the HPA axis across development.

    Camelia E. Hostinar;Megan R. Gunnar

  • Parental buffering of fear and stress neurobiology: Reviewing parallels across rodent, monkey, and human models

    Megan R. Gunnar;Camelia E. Hostinar;Mar M. Sanchez;Nim Tottenham

  • Intervention effects on diurnal cortisol rhythms of Child Protective Services-referred infants in early childhood: preschool follow-up results of a randomized clinical trial.

    Kristin Bernard;Camelia E. Hostinar;Mary Dozier

  • The Developmental Effects of Early Life Stress An Overview of Current Theoretical Frameworks

    Camelia E. Hostinar;Megan R. Gunnar

  • Social Support Can Buffer Against Stress and Shape Brain Activity

    Camelia E. Hostinar;Megan R. Gunnar

  • Conceptualizing Puberty as a Window of Opportunity for Impacting Health and Well-Being Across the Life Span.

    Lorah D. Dorn;Camelia E. Hostinar;Elizabeth J. Susman;Panagiota Pervanidou

  • Social deprivation and the HPA axis in early development

    Kalsea J. Koss;Camelia E. Hostinar;Bonny Donzella;Megan R. Gunnar

  • Psychosocial functioning and the cortisol awakening response: Meta-analysis, P-curve analysis, and evaluation of the evidential value in existing studies

    Ian Andres Boggero;Camelia E. Hostinar;Eric A. Haak;Michael L. M. Murphy

  • Early social deprivation and the social buffering of cortisol stress responses in late childhood: An experimental study.

    Camelia E. Hostinar;Anna E. Johnson;Megan R. Gunnar

  • Oxytocin receptor gene polymorphism, perceived social support, and psychological symptoms in maltreated adolescents.

    Camelia E. Hostinar;Dante Cicchetti;Fred A. Rogosch

  • Future Directions in the Study of Early-Life Stress and Physical and Emotional Health: Implications of the Neuroimmune Network Hypothesis.

    Camelia E. Hostinar;Robin Nusslock;Gregory E. Miller

  • The roles of puberty and age in explaining the diminished effectiveness of parental buffering of HPA reactivity and recovery in adolescence.

    Jenalee R. Doom;Camelia E. Hostinar;Camelia E. Hostinar;Adrienne A. VanZomeren-Dohm;Megan R. Gunnar

  • Protective factors for youth confronting economic hardship: Current challenges and future avenues in resilience research.

    Camelia E. Hostinar;Gregory E. Miller

  • A review of mental health disparities during COVID-19: Evidence, mechanisms, and policy recommendations for promoting societal resilience

    Unknown

  • The emergence of attachment following early social deprivation

    Elizabeth A. Carlson;Camelia E. Hostinar;Shanna B. Mliner;Megan R. Gunnar

  • Early Social Deprivation and the Social Buffering of Cortisol Stress Reponses in Late Childhood

    Camelia E. Hostinar;A. E. Johnson;Megan R Gunnar

  • Development and Psychopathology

    Elizabeth P. Hayden;C. Emily Durbin

Frequent Co-Authors

Megan R. Gunnar
Megan R. Gunnar University of Minnesota
Gregory E. Miller
Gregory E. Miller Northwestern University
Grant S. Shields
Grant S. Shields University of Arkansas at Fayetteville
Edith Chen
Edith Chen Northwestern University
Paul D. Hastings
Paul D. Hastings University of California, Davis
Kristin Bernard
Kristin Bernard Stony Brook University
Teresa E. Seeman
Teresa E. Seeman University of California, Los Angeles
Mary Dozier
Mary Dozier University of Delaware
Dante Cicchetti
Dante Cicchetti University of Minnesota
Brian C. Trainor
Brian C. Trainor University of California, Davis

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in psychology opens doors to an array of rewarding career paths. With flexible online programs now widely available, students can explore areas such as clinical psychology, counseling, organizational psychology, and education. Many online degrees offer the same rigorous curriculum as their on-campus counterparts, helping you build critical research, analytical, and interpersonal skills.

When searching for the right program, location and reputation may still matter, even for online studies. For example, you might compare the best psychology degree rankings in Houston, or explore the best psychology degree programs ranking in the Midwest. If you’re considering more specific regions, take a look at the best psychology degree programs ranking in Nebraska, or review top schools with the best psychology degree programs ranking in New York City.

Whichever path you choose, earning a psychology degree online can set you up for fulfilling roles in mental health, social services, healthcare, human resources, or research. Take time to research program rankings to find the one that best suits your professional goals and interests.

Best Scientists Citing Camelia E. Hostinar

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles