World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
34
Citations
5247
World Ranking
12131
National Ranking
229

David A. Abbink publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David A. Abbink sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 164 publications — 32nd percentile

32% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

David A. Abbink D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David A. Abbink sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 34 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

David A. Abbink is affiliated with Delft University of Technology in the Netherlands. Their research spans multiple fields, predominantly in engineering and psychology, with a focus on subfields such as social psychology, safety, risk, reliability and quality, automotive engineering, control and systems engineering, and mechanical engineering.

Their work covers several key topics, including:

  • Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
  • Traffic and Road Safety
  • Autonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety
  • Teleoperation and Haptic Systems
  • Traffic Control and Management
  • Robot Manipulation and Learning
  • Safety Warnings and Signage

David A. Abbink has contributed to a range of recent publications:

  • "Human-like driving behaviour emerges from a risk-based driver model", 2020, Nature Communications
  • "Meaningful human control: actionable properties for AI system development", 2022, AI and Ethics
  • "Modelling communication-enabled traffic interactions", 2023, Royal Society Open Science
  • "A risk field-based metric correlates with driver's perceived risk in manual and automated driving: A test-track study", 2021, Transportation Research Part C Emerging Technologies
  • "Which parts of the road guide obstacle avoidance? Quantifying the driver's risk field", 2020, Applied Ergonomics

Their frequent co-authors include:

  • Arkady Zgonnikov
  • Luka Peternel
  • Olger Siebinga
  • Joost de Winter
  • Luciano Cavalcante Siebert

Several venues regularly publish the work of David A. Abbink, such as:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society
  • 2021 20th International Conference on Advanced Robotics (ICAR)
  • ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction
  • Transportation Research Part F Traffic Psychology and Behaviour

The combination of topics and subfields indicates a significant focus on interaction between humans and automated systems, especially pertaining to safety and risk management in automotive contexts. The interdisciplinary nature of their research bridges psychological principles with engineering solutions, particularly in traffic safety and vehicle automation.

Best Publications

  • Haptic shared control: smoothly shifting control authority?

    David A. Abbink;Mark Mulder;Erwin R. Boer

  • A Topology of Shared Control Systems—Finding Common Ground in Diversity

    David A. Abbink;Tom Carlson;Mark Mulder;Joost C. F. de Winter

  • Sharing Control With Haptics: Seamless Driver Support From Manual to Automatic Control

    Mark Mulder;David A. Abbink;Erwin R. Boer

  • The effect of haptic guidance on curve negotiation behavior of young, experienced drivers

    M. Mulder;D.A. Abbink;E.R. Boer

  • Human-like driving behaviour emerges from a risk-based driver model.

    Sarvesh Kolekar;Joost de Winter;David Abbink

  • The Effect of Haptic Support Systems on Driver Performance: A Literature Survey

    Sebastiaan M. Petermeijer;David A. Abbink;Mark Mulder;Joost C. F. de Winter

  • Neuromuscular Analysis as a Guideline in designing Shared Control

    D.A. Abbink;M. Mulder

  • The Impact of Haptic Feedback Quality on the Performance of Teleoperated Assembly Tasks

    J. G. W. Wildenbeest;D. A. Abbink;C. J. M. Heemskerk;F. C. T. van der Helm

  • A Task-Specific Analysis of the Benefit of Haptic Shared Control During Telemanipulation

    Henri Boessenkool;David A. Abbink;Cock J.M. Heemskerk;Frans C.T. van der Helm

  • A rigorous model of reflex function indicates that position and force feedback are flexibly tuned to position and force tasks

    Winfred Mugge;David A. Abbink;Alfred C. Schouten;Alfred C. Schouten;Julius P. A. Dewald

  • Shared control is the sharp end of cooperation: Towards a common framework of joint action, shared control and human machine cooperation

    F. Flemisch;David Abbink;M. Itoh;MP Pacaux-Lemoine

  • Design of a Haptic Gas Pedal for Active Car-Following Support

    M Mulder;D A Abbink;M M van Paassen

  • Neuromuscular analysis of haptic gas pedal feedback during car following

    D.A. Abbink

  • Exploring the Dimensions of Haptic Feedback Support in Manual Control

    David A. Abbink;Max Mulder

  • Measuring Neuromuscular Control Dynamics During Car Following With Continuous Haptic Feedback

    D. A. Abbink;M. Mulder;F. C. T. Van der Helm;E. R. Boer

  • Should drivers be operating within an automation-free bandwidth? Evaluating haptic steering support systems with different levels of authority

    Sebastiaan M. Petermeijer;David A. Abbink;Joost C. F. de Winter

  • Haptic gas pedal feedback.

    Max Mulder;M. M. van Paassen;David A. Abbink

  • Manual Control Cybernetics: State-of-the-Art and Current Trends

    Max Mulder;Daan M. Pool;David A. Abbink;Erwin R. Boer

  • Joining the blunt and the pointy end of the spear: towards a common framework of joint action, human–machine cooperation, cooperative guidance and control, shared, traded and supervisory control

    Frank Flemisch;Frank Flemisch;David A. Abbink;Makoto Itoh;Marie-Pierre Pacaux-Lemoine

  • Balancing safety and support: Changing lanes with a haptic lane-keeping support system

    Kakin K. Tsoi;Mark Mulder;David A. Abbink

Frequent Co-Authors

Max Mulder
Max Mulder University of Twente
Joost C. F. de Winter
Joost C. F. de Winter Delft University of Technology
Heinrich H. Bülthoff
Heinrich H. Bülthoff Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics
F.C.T. van der Helm
F.C.T. van der Helm Delft University of Technology
Alfred C. Schouten
Alfred C. Schouten Delft University of Technology
M Maarten Steinbuch
M Maarten Steinbuch Eindhoven University of Technology
Catholijn M. Jonker
Catholijn M. Jonker Delft University of Technology
Efstathios Velenis
Efstathios Velenis Cranfield University
Bigna Lenggenhager
Bigna Lenggenhager University of Zurich
Fokko M. Mulder
Fokko M. Mulder Delft University of Technology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Computer Science in the USA opens diverse pathways, from associate to doctoral levels. Many start their journey by earning an associate degree at community colleges near me, which offers a cost-effective entry point to foundational CS knowledge.

For those looking to advance, choosing among affordable graduate schools for a master’s degree can sharpen expertise and open doors to specialized tech roles. Online programs provide flexibility, making it easier for working professionals to continue their education without relocating.

Ambitious learners interested in leadership can pursue a phd leadership online, building both technical and management skills for high-level positions in academia or industry. Alternatively, an ed d degree is ideal for those aiming to innovate in education and training within tech fields.

These flexible online degrees allow students to carve out personalized, affordable routes to success in the dynamic landscape of computing and technology careers.

Best Scientists Citing David A. Abbink

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles