World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
54
Citations
11855
World Ranking
4555
National Ranking
65

Joost C. F. de Winter publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Joost C. F. de Winter sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 178 publications — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Joost C. F. de Winter D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Joost C. F. de Winter sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 54 D-Index — 69th percentile

69% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Joost C. F. de Winter is affiliated with Delft University of Technology in the Netherlands. Their research spans multiple domains, with a strong focus on topics related to human behavior, safety, and automation technology.

The primary fields of study include:

  • Psychology
  • Engineering

Within these fields, their work concentrates on subfields such as:

  • Social Psychology
  • Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality
  • Automotive Engineering
  • Human-Computer Interaction
  • Cognitive Neuroscience

The main topics addressed in their research are:

  • Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
  • Traffic and Road Safety
  • Safety Warnings and Signage
  • Autonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety
  • Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology
  • Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts

Joost de Winter has contributed extensively to several journals and publication venues. Frequent venues for their publications include:

  • Transportation Research Part F Traffic Psychology and Behaviour
  • Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society
  • Ergonomics
  • Applied Ergonomics
  • arXiv (Cornell University)

Their recent scholarly articles demonstrate varied interests, such as driving behavior, automated vehicle safety, and methodological approaches in human factors research. Notable recent papers include:

  • Using the Student's t-test with extremely small sample sizes, 2020, Scholarworks (University of Massachusetts Amherst)
  • Human-like driving behaviour emerges from a risk-based driver model, 2020, Nature Communications
  • Using Eye-Tracking Data to Predict Situation Awareness in Real Time During Takeover Transitions in Conditionally Automated Driving, 2021, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems
  • Vulnerable road users and the coming wave of automated vehicles: Expert perspectives, 2021, Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives
  • Using ChatGPT for human-computer interaction research: a primer, 2023, Royal Society Open Science

Throughout their career, they have collaborated frequently with several coauthors, including:

  • Dimitra Dodou
  • Yke Bauke Eisma
  • Pavlo Bazilinskyy
  • Tom Driessen
  • David A. Abbink

Best Publications

  • Public opinion on automated driving: results of an international questionnaire among 5000 respondents

    M. Kyriakidis;R. Happee;J.C.F. de Winter

  • Exploratory Factor Analysis with Small Sample Sizes.

    J. C. F. de Winter;D. Dodou;P. A. Wieringa

  • Comparing the Pearson and Spearman correlation coefficients across distributions and sample sizes: A tutorial using simulations and empirical data.

    Joost C. F. de Winter;Samuel D. Gosling;Jeff Potter

  • Effects of adaptive cruise control and highly automated driving on workload and situation awareness: A review of the empirical evidence

    Joost C.F. de Winter;Riender Happee;Marieke Hendrikje Martens;Neville A. Stanton

  • The Driver Behaviour Questionnaire as a predictor of accidents: A meta-analysis

    J.C.F. de Winter;D. Dodou

  • Determinants of take-over time from automated driving : A meta-analysis of 129 studies

    Bo Zhang;Joost de Winter;Silvia Varotto;Riender Happee

  • A human factors perspective on automated driving

    M. Kyriakidis;J.C.F. de Winter;N Stanton;T. Bellet

  • Acceptance of driverless vehicles: Results from a large cross-national questionnaire study

    Sina Nordhoff;Joost de Winter;Miltos Kyriakidis;Bart van Arem

  • External human-machine interfaces on automated vehicles: Effects on pedestrian crossing decisions

    Koen de Clercq;André Dietrich;Juan Pablo Núñez Velasco;Joost C. F. de Winter

  • Social desirability is the same in offline, online, and paper surveys

    D. Dodou;J.C.F. de Winter

  • Review of eye-related measures of drivers’ mental workload

    Gerhard Marquart;Christopher Cabrall;Joost C. F. de Winter

  • A Topology of Shared Control Systems—Finding Common Ground in Diversity

    David A. Abbink;Tom Carlson;Mark Mulder;Joost C. F. de Winter

  • User acceptance of automated shuttles in Berlin-Schöneberg : A questionnaire study

    S. Nordhoff;J.C.F. de Winter;Ruth Madigan;Natasha Merat

  • Human factors of transitions in automated driving: A general framework and literature survey

    Zhenji Lu;Riender Happee;Christopher D.D. Cabrall;Miltos Kyriakidis;Miltos Kyriakidis

  • Relationships between driving simulator performance and driving test results

    J C F de Winter;S de Groot;M Mulder;P A Wieringa

  • Take-over requests in highly automated driving: A crowdsourcing survey on auditory, vibrotactile, and visual displays

    P. Bazilinskyy;S.M. Petermeijer;V. Petrovych;D. Dodou

  • How much time do drivers need to obtain situation awareness? A laboratory-based study of automated driving.

    Zhenji Lu;Xander Coster;Joost de Winter

  • Interaction between pedestrians and automated vehicles : A Wizard of Oz experiment

    Ana Rodríguez Palmeiro;Sander van der Kint;Luuk Vissers;Haneen Farah

  • Automated Driving: Human-Factors Issues and Design Solutions:

    M. Saffarian;J. C. F. de Winter;R. Happee

  • Advantages and Disadvantages of Driving Simulators: A Discussion

    J. C. F. de Winter;R. Happee

  • Human-like driving behaviour emerges from a risk-based driver model.

    Sarvesh Kolekar;Joost de Winter;David Abbink

  • Public Opinion on Automated Driving: Results of an International Questionnaire Among 5,000 Respondents

    Miltos Kyriakidis;Riender Happee;Joost de Winter

  • Vibrotactile Displays: A Survey With a View on Highly Automated Driving

    Sebastiaan M. Petermeijer;Joost C. F. de Winter;Klaus J. Bengler

  • Using Eye-tracking Data to Predict Situation Awareness in Real Time during Takeover Transitions in Conditionally Automated Driving

    Feng Zhou;X. Jessie Yang;Joost C. F. de Winter

  • Survey on eHMI concepts: The effect of text, color, and perspective

    Pavlo Bazilinskyy;Dimitra Dodou;Joost de Winter

Frequent Co-Authors

David A. Abbink
David A. Abbink Delft University of Technology
Neville A. Stanton
Neville A. Stanton University of Southampton
Bart van Arem
Bart van Arem Delft University of Technology
Klaus Bengler
Klaus Bengler Technical University of Munich
Peter A. Hancock
Peter A. Hancock University of Central Florida
Natasha Merat
Natasha Merat University of Leeds
Feng Zhou
Feng Zhou University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Stefan Klein
Stefan Klein Erasmus University Rotterdam
Max Mulder
Max Mulder University of Twente

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Choosing the right pathway in computer science can open doors to rewarding careers, but it’s important to consider your academic background, budget, and career goals. For those aiming to fast-track their entry into the tech industry, an online associate's degree in computer science can provide essential skills and foundational knowledge in as little as two years.

If you’re looking for flexibility in your studies, exploring the most affordable online colleges ensures you receive quality education without breaking the bank. Some institutions are notably supportive for students who might not have achieved top grades previously, and you can find a college with low gpa requirements to help you get started on your tech journey.

As you advance in your field, considering one of the most valuable masters degrees can lead to higher earning potential and specialized roles in areas such as artificial intelligence or cybersecurity. These online pathways make it easier than ever to build a successful career in computer science, regardless of your starting point.

Best Scientists Citing Joost C. F. de Winter

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles