World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
72
Citations
24885
World Ranking
19780
National Ranking
1776

J. Jaime Caro publications per year

1979: 1 publications 1980: 1 publications 1981: 1 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 1 publications 1984: 2 publications 1985: 2 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 2 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 1 publications 1992: 1 publications 1993: 3 publications 1994: 1 publications 1995: 2 publications 1996: 5 publications 1997: 10 publications 1998: 16 publications 1999: 16 publications 2000: 19 publications 2001: 22 publications 2002: 34 publications 2003: 21 publications 2004: 27 publications 2005: 43 publications 2006: 31 publications 2007: 37 publications 2008: 22 publications 2009: 17 publications 2010: 11 publications 2011: 8 publications 2012: 8 publications 2013: 6 publications 2014: 9 publications 2015: 11 publications 2016: 9 publications 2017: 8 publications 2018: 5 publications 2019: 8 publications 2020: 8 publications 2021: 5 publications
1979 2021

434 publications in total across all disciplines

J. Jaime Caro publication distribution in Medicine in 2027

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2027. The highlighted bar marks where J. Jaime Caro sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 424 publications — 44th percentile

44% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

J. Jaime Caro D-index placement in Medicine in 2027

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2027. The highlighted bar marks where J. Jaime Caro sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 72 D-Index — 2nd percentile

2% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Internal medicine
  • Disease
  • Statistics

J. Jaime Caro mostly deals with Health care, Internal medicine, Management science, Disease and Surgery. The Health care study combines topics in areas such as Psychological intervention, MEDLINE and Economic evaluation. His Internal medicine study combines topics in areas such as Oncology and Cardiology.

J. Jaime Caro has included themes like Epidemiology, Pediatrics and Intensive care medicine in his Disease study. The study incorporates disciplines such as Stroke, Clinical trial and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in addition to Intensive care medicine. His work on Randomized controlled trial as part of general Surgery research is often related to Cost estimate, thus linking different fields of science.

His most cited work include:

  • A systematic review of low back pain cost of illness studies in the United States and internationally. (1321 citations)
  • Anemia As an Independent Prognostic Factor for Survival in Patients with Cancer A Systematic, Quantitative Review (690 citations)
  • Model transparency and validation: a report of the ISPOR-SMDM Modeling Good Research Practices Task Force-7 (461 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

J. Jaime Caro focuses on Intensive care medicine, Internal medicine, Disease, Surgery and Health care. His study in Intensive care medicine is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Diabetes mellitus, Physical therapy and Stroke. The concepts of his Internal medicine study are interwoven with issues in Gastroenterology, Oncology and Cardiology.

His Disease study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Clinical trial, Pediatrics and Gerontology. His study explores the link between Pediatrics and topics such as Vaccination that cross with problems in Environmental health. His research integrates issues of Actuarial science, Management science and Economic evaluation in his study of Health care.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Intensive care medicine (19.19%)
  • Internal medicine (18.69%)
  • Disease (11.36%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2010-2020)?

  • Health care (10.86%)
  • Management science (4.04%)
  • Health technology (4.04%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

J. Jaime Caro mainly focuses on Health care, Management science, Health technology, Health economics and Discrete event simulation. His Health care research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Psychological intervention, Relevance and Economic evaluation. His studies in Economic evaluation integrate themes in fields like Stroke and Myocardial infarction.

The Management science study combines topics in areas such as Comparative effectiveness research, Multiple-criteria decision analysis and Decision analysis. J. Jaime Caro works mostly in the field of Health technology, limiting it down to concerns involving Best practice and, occasionally, Process. His research in Health economics focuses on subjects like Health administration, which are connected to Quality of Life Research.

Between 2010 and 2020, his most popular works were:

  • Model transparency and validation: a report of the ISPOR-SMDM Modeling Good Research Practices Task Force-7 (461 citations)
  • Budget Impact Analysis—Principles of Good Practice: Report of the ISPOR 2012 Budget Impact Analysis Good Practice II Task Force (441 citations)
  • Modeling good research practices - Overview: A report of the ISPOR-SMDM modeling good research practices task force-1 (344 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Internal medicine
  • Disease
  • Statistics

Management science, Health care, Health technology, Psychological intervention and Best practice are his primary areas of study. His Management science research includes elements of Transparency, Predictive validity and External validity. His Health care research incorporates elements of Multiple-criteria decision analysis, Decision analysis and Economic evaluation.

His Psychological intervention research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Reimbursement, Quality of life, Presentation, Intervention and Intervention. His Reimbursement research is multidisciplinary, incorporating perspectives in Outcomes research, MEDLINE, Population health and Operations management. His work carried out in the field of Best practice brings together such families of science as Discrete event simulation, Relevance and Process.

Best Publications

  • A systematic review of low back pain cost of illness studies in the United States and internationally.

    Simon Dagenais;Jaime Caro;Scott Haldeman;Scott Haldeman;Scott Haldeman

  • Modeling good research practices--overview: a report of the ISPOR-SMDM Modeling Good Research Practices Task Force-1.

    J. Jaime Caro;Andrew H. Briggs;Uwe Siebert;Karen M. Kuntz

  • Anemia as an independent prognostic factor for survival in patients with cancer: a systemic, quantitative review.

    J. Jaime Caro;Maribel Salas;Alexandra Ward;Glenwood Goss

  • Budget Impact Analysis—Principles of Good Practice: Report of the ISPOR 2012 Budget Impact Analysis Good Practice II Task Force

    Sean D. Sullivan;Josephine A. Mauskopf;Federico Augustovski;J. Jaime Caro

  • Model transparency and validation: a report of the ISPOR-SMDM Modeling Good Research Practices Task Force-7

    David M. Eddy;William Hollingworth;J. Jaime Caro;Joel Tsevat

  • Principles of Good Practice for Budget Impact Analysis: Report of the ISPOR Task Force on Good Research Practices—Budget Impact Analysis

    Josephine A. Mauskopf;Sean D. Sullivan;Lieven Annemans;Jaime Caro

  • Modeling using discrete event simulation: a report of the ISPOR-SMDM Modeling Good Research Practices Task Force-4.

    Jonathan Karnon;James Stahl;Alan Brennan;J. Jaime Caro

  • The impact of compliance with osteoporosis therapy on fracture rates in actual practice

    J. Jaime Caro;Khajak J. Ishak;Krista F. Huybrechts;Gabriel Raggio

  • Persistence with treatment for hypertension in actual practice

    J. Jaime Caro;Maribel Salas;Jeanne L. Speckman;Gabriel Raggio

  • Characteristics Relating to Ovarian Cancer Risk: Collaborative Analysis of 12 US Case -Control Studies II. Invasive Epithelial Ovarian Cancers in White Women

    J. Jaime Caro;Catherine B. Johannes;Stuart C. Hartz;Richard Marrs

  • Assessment of compliance with osteoporosis treatment and its consequences in a managed care population

    Krista F. Huybrechts;Khajak J. Ishak;J. Jaime Caro

  • The Emerging Infectious Challenge of Clostridium difficile -Associated Disease in Massachusetts Hospitals: Clinical and Economic Consequences

    Judith A. O'Brien;Betsy J. Lahue;J. Jaime Caro;David M. Davidson

  • Effect of initial drug choice on persistence with antihypertensive therapy: the importance of actual practice data

    J. Jaime Caro;Jeanne L. Speckman;Maribel Salas;Gabriel Raggio

  • Lifetime costs of complications resulting from type 2 diabetes in the U.S.

    J. Jaime Caro;Alexandra J. Ward;Judith A. O’Brien

  • The importance of patient-reported outcomes: a call for their comprehensive integration in cardiovascular clinical trials

    Stefan D. Anker;Stefan D. Anker;Stefan Agewall;Martin Borggrefe;Melanie Calvert

  • The risks of death and of severe nonfatal reactions with high- vs low-osmolality contrast media: a meta-analysis.

    J J Caro;E Trindade;M McGregor

  • Assessing the value of healthcare interventions using multi-criteria decision analysis: a review of the literature.

    Kevin Marsh;Tereza Lanitis;David Neasham;Panagiotis Orfanos

  • Prevention of pertussis: recommendations derived from the second Global Pertussis Initiative roundtable meeting.

    Kevin D. Forsyth;Carl Heinz Wirsing von Konig;Tina Quanbee Tan;Jaime Caro

  • Pharmacoeconomic analyses using discrete event simulation

    J. Jaime Caro

  • The morbidity and mortality following a diagnosis of peripheral arterial disease: long-term follow-up of a large database.

    Jaime Caro;Kristen Migliaccio-Walle;Khajak J Ishak;Irina Proskorovsky

Frequent Co-Authors

Uwe Siebert
Uwe Siebert UMIT Tirol - Private University for Health Sciences and Health Technology
William S. Weintraub
William S. Weintraub Georgetown University
Stanley A. Plotkin
Stanley A. Plotkin University of Pennsylvania
Alistair McGuire
Alistair McGuire London School of Economics and Political Science
Andrew Briggs
Andrew Briggs University of Glasgow
Norman K. Hollenberg
Norman K. Hollenberg Brigham and Women's Hospital
Robert M. Califf
Robert M. Califf Duke University
Mark T. Drayson
Mark T. Drayson University of Birmingham
Ian Ford
Ian Ford University of Glasgow
Sean D. Sullivan
Sean D. Sullivan University of Washington

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring medical careers in the USA is no longer limited to traditional pathways. Today, aspiring healthcare professionals can choose from a range of relevant online programs to jumpstart or advance their journey in medicine and allied fields.

For nurses seeking career growth, adn to fnp bridge programs provide a flexible solution to progress from an associate degree in nursing to a family nurse practitioner role. Registered nurses who want to earn a bachelor’s degree may prefer rn to bsn no clinical hours options, which remove the barrier of in-person clinical requirements.

Students passionate about nutrition can prepare for healthcare roles through a bachelor's in nutrition online, gaining foundational knowledge in dietary science and wellness. Those interested in healthcare management may consider enrolling in one of several cahme accredited online mha programs to build leadership skills essential for hospital or clinical administration.

Exploring these online degree pathways can open doors to rewarding positions in healthcare, supporting your long-term career growth in the dynamic medical field.

Best Scientists Citing J. Jaime Caro

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles