World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Materials Science

D-Index
55
Citations
10967
World Ranking
8589
National Ranking
111

Chemistry

D-Index
57
Citations
11304
World Ranking
11108
National Ranking
214

Fokko M. Mulder publication distribution in Materials Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Materials Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Fokko M. Mulder sits on this spectrum.

50–69 publications: 28 scientists 70–89 publications: 152 scientists 90–109 publications: 356 scientists 110–129 publications: 487 scientists 130–149 publications: 723 scientists 150–169 publications: 835 scientists 170–189 publications: 850 scientists 190–209 publications: 891 scientists 210–229 publications: 862 scientists 230–249 publications: 766 scientists 250–269 publications: 726 scientists 270–289 publications: 665 scientists 290–309 publications: 593 scientists 310–329 publications: 537 scientists 330–349 publications: 477 scientists 350–369 publications: 440 scientists 370–389 publications: 356 scientists 390–409 publications: 321 scientists 410–429 publications: 256 scientists 430–449 publications: 246 scientists 450–469 publications: 216 scientists 470–489 publications: 212 scientists 490–509 publications: 174 scientists 510–529 publications: 194 scientists 530–549 publications: 162 scientists 550–569 publications: 131 scientists 570–589 publications: 111 scientists 590–609 publications: 103 scientists 610–629 publications: 99 scientists 630–649 publications: 77 scientists 650–669 publications: 92 scientists 670–689 publications: 56 scientists 690–709 publications: 53 scientists 710–729 publications: 53 scientists 730–749 publications: 38 scientists 750–769 publications: 52 scientists 770–789 publications: 43 scientists 790–809 publications: 38 scientists 810–829 publications: 34 scientists 830–849 publications: 25 scientists 850–869 publications: 18 scientists 870–889 publications: 20 scientists 890–909 publications: 24 scientists 910–929 publications: 27 scientists 930–949 publications: 20 scientists 950–969 publications: 17 scientists 970–989 publications: 10 scientists 990–1,009 publications: 16 scientists 1,010–1,029 publications: 13 scientists 1,030–1,049 publications: 12 scientists 1,050–1,069 publications: 9 scientists 1,070–1,089 publications: 8 scientists 1,090–1,109 publications: 7 scientists 1,110–1,129 publications: 9 scientists 1,130–1,149 publications: 2 scientists 1,150–1,162 publications: 5 scientists 1,163+ publications: 100 scientists
50 publications 1,163+

This scientist: 184 publications — 25th percentile

25% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,163 publications or more.

Fokko M. Mulder D-index placement in Materials Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Materials Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Fokko M. Mulder sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 211 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 450 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 612 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 612 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 598 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 657 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 667 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 621 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 597 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 610 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 587 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 606 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 533 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 490 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 469 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 378 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 421 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 359 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 323 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 299 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 230 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 210 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 195 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 203 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 175 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 175 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 142 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 121 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 117 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 107 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 88 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 85 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 68 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 62 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 57 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 45 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 49 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 50 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 34 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 38 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 37 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 29 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 28 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 24 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 33 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 28 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 20 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 23 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 17 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 12 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 17 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 21 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 13 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 11 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 13 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 9 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 4 scientists 164 D-Index: 3 scientists 165+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 165+

This scientist: 55 D-Index — 34th percentile

34% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 165 D-Index or more.

Overview

Fokko M. Mulder is affiliated with Delft University of Technology in the Netherlands. Their research spans several areas of engineering and chemical engineering, with a particular focus on ammonia synthesis, nitrogen reduction, and advances in battery materials and hydrogen storage.

Their main fields of study include:

  • Engineering
  • Chemical Engineering

Subfields of study in which they frequently publish are:

  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering
  • Catalysis
  • Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
  • Materials Chemistry
  • Automotive Engineering

The primary research topics Mulder has contributed to cover:

  • Ammonia Synthesis and Nitrogen Reduction
  • Advancements in Battery Materials
  • Advanced Battery Technologies Research
  • Hydrogen Storage and Materials
  • Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies
  • CO2 Reduction Techniques and Catalysts
  • Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion

Mulder has published extensively in various scientific venues, frequently contributing to:

  • ECS Meeting Abstracts
  • ACS Energy Letters
  • ACS Catalysis
  • Cell Reports Physical Science
  • ChemSusChem

Some recent notable papers include:

  • Gas Chromatographic Method for In Situ Ammonia Quantification at Parts per Billion Levels, 2020, ACS Energy Letters
  • Overcoming Nitrogen Reduction to Ammonia Detection Challenges: The Case for Leapfrogging to Gas Diffusion Electrode Platforms, 2022, ACS Catalysis
  • Eliminating redox-mediated electron transfer mechanisms on a supported molecular catalyst enables CO2 conversion to ethanol, 2024, Nature Catalysis
  • Ammonia Synthesis at Ambient Conditions via Electrochemical Atomic Hydrogen Permeation, 2021, ACS Energy Letters
  • Accelerating 1H NMR Detection of Aqueous Ammonia, 2021, ACS Omega

Frequent co-authors include:

  • Davide Ripepi
  • Pranav Karanth
  • Mark Weijers
  • Boaz Izelaar
  • Ruud Kortlever

Best Publications

  • Large Impact of Particle Size on Insertion Reactions. A Case for Anatase LixTiO2

    Marnix Wagemaker;Wouter J. H. Borghols;Fokko M. Mulder

  • Equilibrium lithium transport between nanocrystalline phases in intercalated TiO2 anatase

    M. Wagemaker;A. P. M. Kentgens;F. M. Mulder

  • Size Effects in the Li4+xTi5O12 Spinel

    W. J. H. Borghols;M. Wagemaker;U. Lafont;E. M. Kelder

  • In situ methods for Li-ion battery research : a review of recent developments

    Pprml Peter-Paul Harks;FM Mulder;Phl Peter Notten;Phl Peter Notten

  • Two Phase Morphology Limits Lithium Diffusion in TiO2 (Anatase): A 7Li MAS NMR Study

    M. Wagemaker;R. van de Krol;A.P.M. Kentgens;A.A. van Well

  • Multiple Li positions inside oxygen octahedra in lithiated TiO2 anatase.

    Marnix Wagemaker;Gordon J. Kearley;Ad A. Van Well;Hannu Mutka

  • Properties and promises of nanosized insertion materials for Li-ion batteries.

    Marnix Wagemaker;Fokko M. Mulder

  • Proof of Supervalent Doping in Olivine LiFePO4

    Marnix Wagemaker;Brian L. Ellis;Dirk Lützenkirchen-Hecht;Fokko M. Mulder

  • A Kinetic Two‐Phase and Equilibrium Solid Solution in Spinel Li4+xTi5O12

    Marnix Wagemaker;Daniel R. Simon;Erik M. Kelder;Joop Schoonman

  • Hydrogen Cycling of Niobium and Vanadium Catalyzed Nanostructured Magnesium

    H. Gijs Schimmel;Jacques Huot;Laurent C. Chapon;Frans D. Tichelaar

  • Methyl modified MOF-5: a water stable hydrogen storage material

    Jie Yang;Anna Grzech;Fokko M. Mulder;Theo J. Dingemans

  • Li-Ion Diffusion in the Equilibrium Nanomorphology of Spinel Li4+xTi5O12

    Marnix Wagemaker;Ernst R. H. van Eck;Arno P. M. Kentgens;Fokko M. Mulder

  • Hydrogen adsorption in carbon nanostructures: comparison of nanotubes, fibers, and coals.

    H. Gijs Schimmel;Gordon J. Kearley;Marije G. Nijkamp;Cornelis T. Visser

  • The Role of Surface and Interface Energy on Phase Stability of Nanosized Insertion Compounds

    Marnix Wagemaker;Fokko M. Mulder;Anton Van der Ven

  • Dynamic Solubility Limits in Nanosized Olivine LiFePO4

    Marnix Wagemaker;Deepak P. Singh;Wouter J.H. Borghols;Wouter J.H. Borghols;Ugo Lafont

  • Lithium Storage in Amorphous TiO2 Nanoparticles

    Wouter J. H. Borghols;Wouter J. H. Borghols;Dirk Lützenkirchen-Hecht;Ullrich Haake;Wingkee Chan

  • A refined model of the chlorosomal antennae of the green bacterium Chlorobium tepidum from proton chemical shift constraints obtained with high-field 2-D and 3-D MAS NMR dipolar correlation spectroscopy.

    B.-J. van Rossum,‡,§;D. B. Steensgaard;F. M. Mulder;G. J. Boender

  • Hydrogen adsorption strength and sites in the metal organic framework MOF5: Comparing experiment and model calculations

    F.M. Mulder;T.J. Dingemans;H.G. Schimmel;A.J. Ramirez-Cuesta

  • The electronic structure and ionic diffusion of nanoscale LiTiO2 anatase.

    W. J. H. Borghols;D. Lützenkirchen-Hecht;U. Haake;E. R. H. van Eck

  • Lithium dynamics in LiMn2O4 probed directly by two-dimensional 7Li NMR

    V.W.J. Verhoeven;I.M. de Schepper;G.H. Nachtegaal;A.P.M. Kentgens

Frequent Co-Authors

Marnix Wagemaker
Marnix Wagemaker Delft University of Technology
Gordon J. Kearley
Gordon J. Kearley University College Dublin
Stephen J. Picken
Stephen J. Picken Delft University of Technology
K.H.J. Buschow
K.H.J. Buschow University of Amsterdam
Arno P. M. Kentgens
Arno P. M. Kentgens Radboud University
Jacques Huot
Jacques Huot Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières
R Reinder Coehoorn
R Reinder Coehoorn Eindhoven University of Technology
Henny W. Zandbergen
Henny W. Zandbergen Delft University of Technology
Anibal J. Ramirez-Cuesta
Anibal J. Ramirez-Cuesta Oak Ridge National Laboratory
Rüdiger-A. Eichel
Rüdiger-A. Eichel Forschungszentrum Jülich

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Fokko M. Mulder

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles