World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
58
Citations
15765
World Ranking
3584
National Ranking
160

Martin Grohe publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Martin Grohe sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 250 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 560 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 424 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 378 scientists 262–271 publications: 300 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 238 publications — 59th percentile

59% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Martin Grohe D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Martin Grohe sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 984 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 969 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 765 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 517 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 58 D-Index — 75th percentile

75% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2017 - ACM Fellow For contributions to logic in computer science, database theory, algorithms, and computational complexity

Overview

Martin Grohe is affiliated with RWTH Aachen University in Germany and specializes in computer science, with a significant focus on computational theory and mathematics. Their scholarly output includes 160 publications in the broader field, with emphasis on subfields such as computational theory and mathematics, artificial intelligence, computer networks and communications, computer vision and pattern recognition, and signal processing.

The research topics addressed by Grohe cover multiple areas within computer science. Key themes include complexity and algorithms in graphs, advanced graph theory research, advanced graph neural networks, Bayesian modeling and causal inference, data management and algorithms, graph theory and algorithms, and machine learning applications in materials science.

Among the recent papers associated with or co-authored by Martin Grohe are:

  • "Graph Neural Networks for Prediction of Fuel Ignition Quality," 2020, Energy & Fuels
  • "The graph isomorphism problem," 2020, Communications of the ACM
  • "Physical pooling functions in graph neural networks for molecular property prediction," 2023, Computers & Chemical Engineering
  • "Classification of properties and their relation to chemical bonding: Essential steps toward the inverse design of functional materials," 2022, Science Advances
  • "Graph Neural Networks for Maximum Constraint Satisfaction," 2021, Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence

Frequent collaborators in their research include Daniel Neuen, Jan G. Rittig, Alexander Mitsos, Pascal Schweitzer, and Martin Ritzert, reflecting a network of ongoing scientific partnerships.

Martin Grohe publishes prolifically in various venues, notably arXiv (Cornell University) with 34 publications, Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (Schloss Dagstuhl) with 9, Logical Methods in Computer Science with 3, the Journal of the ACM with 3, and RWTH Publications (RWTH Aachen) also with 3 contributions.

In recognition of their scientific contributions, Martin Grohe has been awarded the ACM Fellow distinction in 2017 for work spanning logic in computer science, database theory, algorithms, and computational complexity.

Best Publications

  • Parameterized complexity theory

    Jörg Flum;Martin Grohe

  • Parameterized Complexity Theory (Texts in Theoretical Computer Science. An EATCS Series)

    J. Flum;M. Grohe

  • Weisfeiler and Leman Go Neural: Higher-Order Graph Neural Networks

    Christopher Morris;Martin Ritzert;Matthias Fey;William L. Hamilton

  • The complexity of homomorphism and constraint satisfaction problems seen from the other side

    Martin Grohe

  • The complexity of first-order and monadic second-order logic revisited

    Markus Frick;Martin Grohe

  • The Parameterized Complexity of Counting Problems

    Jörg Flum;Martin Grohe

  • Query evaluation via tree-decompositions

    Jörg Flum;Markus Frick;Martin Grohe

  • Path queries on compressed XML

    Peter Buneman;Martin Grohe;Christoph Koch

  • Deciding first-order properties of locally tree-decomposable structures

    Markus Frick;Martin Grohe

  • Deciding First-Order Properties of Nowhere Dense Graphs

    Martin Grohe;Stephan Kreutzer;Sebastian Siebertz

  • When is the evaluation of conjunctive queries tractable

    Martin Grohe;Thomas Schwentick;Luc Segoufin

  • The complexity of partition functions

    Andrei Bulatov;Martin Grohe

  • Local Tree-Width, Excluded Minors, and Approximation Algorithms

    Martin Grohe

  • Hypertree width and related hypergraph invariants

    Isolde Adler;Georg Gottlob;Martin Grohe

  • Size Bounds and Query Plans for Relational Joins

    A. Atserias;M. Grohe;D. Marx

  • Definability and Descriptive Complexity on Databases of Bounded Tree-Width

    Martin Grohe;Julian Mariño

  • Fixed-Parameter Tractability, Definability, and Model-Checking

    Jörg Flum;Martin Grohe

  • Locally Excluding a Minor

    A. Dawar;M. Grohe;S. Kreutzer

  • Size Bounds and Query Plans for Relational Joins

    Albert Atserias;Martin Grohe;Dániel Marx

  • Finding topological subgraphs is fixed-parameter tractable

    Martin Grohe;Ken-ichi Kawarabayashi;Dániel Marx;Paul Wollan

  • The graph isomorphism problem

    Martin Grohe;Pascal Schweitzer

  • Descriptive Complexity, Canonisation, and Definable Graph Structure Theory

    Martin Grohe

Frequent Co-Authors

Dániel Marx
Dániel Marx Saarland University
Gerhard J. Woeginger
Gerhard J. Woeginger RWTH Aachen University
Christoph Koch
Christoph Koch École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne
Luc Segoufin
Luc Segoufin French Institute for Research in Computer Science and Automation - INRIA
Rodney G. Downey
Rodney G. Downey Victoria University of Wellington
Mark Jerrum
Mark Jerrum Queen Mary University of London
Leslie Ann Goldberg
Leslie Ann Goldberg University of Oxford
Phokion G. Kolaitis
Phokion G. Kolaitis University of California, Santa Cruz
Erich Grädel
Erich Grädel RWTH Aachen University
Thomas Schwentick
Thomas Schwentick TU Dortmund University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online education in Computer Science and related fields has never been more accessible. Students interested in flexible study options can consider an online computer science degree to gain in-demand skills for the tech industry, often at their own pace.

For those with a passion for sustainability, learning what what can you do with an environmental studies degree can open doors in research, consulting, conservation, and policy-making roles. Engineering-minded students might also explore affordable online options in environmental engineering; take a look at online environmental engineering degree science and engineering for programs that combine technology with ecological impact.

Worried about GPA requirements? There are several will grad schools accept low gpa online programs that consider factors beyond grades, making advanced study possible for diverse learners.

By exploring these options, you can find a degree pathway that suits your career goals—whether that’s in computer science, engineering, or environmental fields—all from the convenience of your home.

Best Scientists Citing Martin Grohe

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles