World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
43
Citations
9973
World Ranking
7862
National Ranking
3399

José A. B. Fortes publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where José A. B. Fortes sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 288 publications — 71st percentile

71% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

José A. B. Fortes D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where José A. B. Fortes sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 46th percentile

46% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2011 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
  • 1999 - IEEE Fellow For contributions to the theory and practice of parallel computing.

Overview

José A. B. Fortes is a researcher affiliated with the University of Florida in the United States. Their work spans multiple areas bridging computer science and environmental science. The main fields of study include Computer Science and Environmental Science, with notable subfields in Information Systems, Computer Networks and Communications, Ecological Modeling, Ecology, and Artificial Intelligence.

The scientist's research covers various topics such as Research Data Management Practices, Species Distribution and Climate Change, Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies, Advanced Data Storage Technologies, Scientific Computing and Data Management, Caching and Content Delivery, and Software Engineering Research.

José A. B. Fortes has published recent papers in well-known venues. These include:

  • "Digital Extended Specimens: Enabling an Extensible Network of Biodiversity Data Records as Integrated Digital Objects on the Internet" (2022), published in BioScience
  • "Toward reliable biodiversity dataset references" (2020), published in Ecological Informatics
  • "Assessing the FAIR Digital Object Framework for Global Biodiversity Research" (2023), published in Research Ideas and Outcomes
  • "Understanding the Impact of Introducing Lambda Expressions in Java Programs" (2020), published in Journal of Software Engineering Research and Development
  • "Using ChatGPT with Confidence for Biodiversity-Related Information Tasks" (2023), published in Biodiversity Information Science and Standards

Their frequent publication venues include:

  • Biodiversity Information Science and Standards (4 publications)
  • BioScience (1 publication)
  • Ecological Informatics (1 publication)
  • Research Ideas and Outcomes (1 publication)
  • Journal of Software Engineering Research and Development (1 publication)

José A. B. Fortes collaborates regularly with a set of coauthors involved in biodiversity and environmental informatics and computing research. Prominent frequent coauthors include Michael J. Elliott, Elizabeth R. Ellwood, Gil Nelson, Jorrit H. Poelen, and Breda M. Zimkus.

The scientist's recognitions include being named a Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in 2011. Additionally, they were awarded IEEE Fellow status in 1999 for contributions to the theory and practice of parallel computing.

Best Publications

  • Multi-Objective Virtual Machine Placement in Virtualized Data Center Environments

    Jing Xu;Jose A. B. Fortes

  • A case for grid computing on virtual machines

    R.J. Figueiredo;P.A. Dinda;J.A.B. Fortes

  • Partitioning and Mapping Algorithms into Fixed Size Systolic Arrays

    Unknown

  • CloudBLAST: Combining MapReduce and Virtualization on Distributed Resources for Bioinformatics Applications

    A. Matsunaga;M. Tsugawa;J. Fortes

  • VMPlants: Providing and Managing Virtual Machine Execution Environments for Grid Computing

    Ivan Krsul;Arijit Ganguly;Jian Zhang;Jose A. B. Fortes

  • Science Clouds: Early Experiences in Cloud Computing for Scientific Applications

    K. Keahey;R. Figueiredo;J. Fortes;T. Freeman

  • Sky Computing

    K. Keahey;M. Tsugawa;A. Matsunaga;J. Fortes

  • From virtualized resources to virtual computing grids: the In-VIGO system

    Sumalatha Adabala;Vineet Chadha;Puneet Chawla;Renato Figueiredo

  • On the Use of Machine Learning to Predict the Time and Resources Consumed by Applications

    Andréa Matsunaga;José A. B. Fortes

  • On the Use of Fuzzy Modeling in Virtualized Data Center Management

    Jing Xu;Ming Zhao;J. Fortes;R. Carpenter

  • Time optimal linear schedules for algorithms with uniform dependencies

    W. Shang;J.A.B. Fortes

  • Coadaptive Brain–Machine Interface via Reinforcement Learning

    J. DiGiovanna;B. Mahmoudi;J. Fortes;J.C. Principe

  • Guest Editors' Introduction: Resource Virtualization Renaissance

    R. Figueiredo;P.A. Dinda;J. Fortes

  • Predictive application-performance modeling in a computational grid environment

    N.H. Kapadia;J.A.B. Fortes;C.E. Brodley

  • A taxonomy of reconfiguration techniques for fault-tolerant processor arrays

    M. Chean;J.A.B. Fortes

  • Autonomic resource management in virtualized data centers using fuzzy logic-based approaches

    Jing Xu;Ming Zhao;José Fortes;Robert Carpenter

  • Toward hardware-redundant, fault-tolerant logic for nanoelectronics

    Jie Han;J. Gao;P. Jonker;Yan Qi

  • Reliability evaluation of logic circuits using probabilistic gate models

    Jie Han;Hao Chen;Erin Boykin;José A. B. Fortes

  • PUNCH: An architecture for Web-enabled wide-area network-computing

    Nirav H. Kapadia;José A. B. Fortes

  • Systematic approaches to the design of algorithmically specified systolic arrays

    J. Fortes;K. Fu;B. Wah

  • A multi-objective approach to virtual machine management in datacenters

    Jing Xu;José Fortes

Frequent Co-Authors

Rudolf Eigenmann
Rudolf Eigenmann University of Delaware
Tao Li
Tao Li University of Florida
Jose C. Principe
Jose C. Principe University of Florida
Mark Lundstrom
Mark Lundstrom Purdue University West Lafayette
Howard Jay Siegel
Howard Jay Siegel Colorado State University
Jie Han
Jie Han University of Alberta
Shigang Chen
Shigang Chen University of Florida
Jaime G. Carbonell
Jaime G. Carbonell Carnegie Mellon University
Annie I. Antón
Annie I. Antón Georgia Institute of Technology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Today’s digital landscape offers students a variety of online pathways in computer science and related fields. For those seeking flexibility, an accelerated computer science degree online can fast-track your education while balancing work and other commitments. Many top programs in the US let you complete your degree at your own pace, sometimes in less time than traditional options.

Tech-focused learners may also explore adjacent disciplines. For instance, you can pursue an online environmental engineering degree science and engineering or an mechanical engineering cost of education to specialize in fields with real-world impact and competitive salaries. Studying online frequently reduces costs and offers greater accessibility without sacrificing quality.

Science-oriented students might wonder, can you get a physics degree online? The answer is yes—more universities are delivering respected programs in physics and engineering through virtual platforms, creating new avenues for your academic and professional growth.

Best Scientists Citing José A. B. Fortes

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles