World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
52
Citations
8762
World Ranking
5160
National Ranking
2371

Annie I. Antón publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Annie I. Antón sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 128 publications — 18th percentile

18% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Annie I. Antón D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Annie I. Antón sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 52 D-Index — 65th percentile

65% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2009 - ACM Distinguished Member

Overview

Annie I. Antón is affiliated with the Georgia Institute of Technology in the United States. Their research spans the intersection of social sciences with a particular focus on safety research.

Their recent publication includes the paper titled Educating the Next Generation of Ethical AI Practitioners, published in 2025 in the Journal of The Colloquium for Information Systems Security Education.

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Annie I. Antón include:

  • Sokratis Katsikas
  • Costas Lambrinoudakis
  • Christos Kalloniatis
  • Stefanos Gritzalis
  • Joaquin García-Alfaro

The primary venue for their recent publications is the Journal of The Colloquium for Information Systems Security Education.

In addition to articles, Annie I. Antón has contributed to book publications with Springer Science+Business Media, including:

  • Computer Security (2020)
  • Computer Security. ESORICS 2023 International Workshops (2024)

Their main topics of research focus on:

  • Ethics and Social Impacts of AI

Annie I. Antón was recognized with the ACM Distinguished Member award in 2009.

Best Publications

  • Goal-based requirements analysis

    A.I. Anton

  • Inquiry-based requirements analysis

    C. Potts;K. Takahashi;A.I. Anton

  • Analyzing Regulatory Rules for Privacy and Security Requirements

    T.D. Breaux;A.I. Anton

  • Towards Regulatory Compliance: Extracting Rights and Obligations to Align Requirements with Regulations

    T.D. Breaux;M.W. Vail;A.I. Anton

  • The use of goals to surface requirements for evolving systems

    Annie I. Antón;Colin Potts

  • Examining Internet privacy policies within the context of user privacy values

    J.B. Earp;A.I. Anton;L. Aiman-Smith;W.H. Stufflebeam

  • Goal decomposition and scenario analysis in business process reengineering

    Annie I. Antón;W. Michael McCracken;Colin Potts

  • Financial privacy policies and the need for standardization

    A.I. Anton;J.B. Earp;Qingfeng He;W. Stufflebeam

  • Addressing Legal Requirements in Requirements Engineering

    P.N. Otto;A.I. Anton

  • How internet users' privacy concerns have evolved since 2002

    A.I. Anton;J.B. Earp;J.D. Young

  • Analyzing Website privacy requirements using a privacy goal taxonomy

    A.I. Anton;J.B. Earp;A. Reese

  • Deriving Goals from a Use-Case Based Requirements Specification

    Annie I. Antón;Ryan A. Carter;Aldo Dagnino;John H. Dempster

  • Automating the Extraction of Rights and Obligations for Regulatory Compliance

    Nadzeya Kiyavitskaya;Nicola Zeni;Travis D. Breaux;Annie I. Antón

  • Strategies for Developing Policies and Requirements for Secure and Private Electronic Commerce

    Annie I. Antón;Julia Brande Earp

  • Misuse and abuse cases: getting past the positive

    P. Hope;G. McGraw;A.I. Anton

  • Towards understanding user perceptions of authentication technologies

    Laurie A. Jones;Annie I. Antón;Julia B. Earp

  • A roadmap for comprehensive online privacy policy management

    Annie I. Antón;Elisa Bertino;Ninghui Li;Ting Yu

  • Identifying and classifying ambiguity for regulatory requirements

    Aaron K. Massey;Richard L. Rutledge;Annie I. Antón;Peter P. Swire

  • Analyzing goal semantics for rights, permissions, and obligations

    T.D. Breaux;A.I. Anton

  • An Empirical Study of Consumer Perceptions and Comprehension of Web Site Privacy Policies

    M.W. Vail;J.B. Earp;A.I. Anton

Frequent Co-Authors

Travis D. Breaux
Travis D. Breaux Carnegie Mellon University
Laurie Williams
Laurie Williams North Carolina State University
John Mylopoulos
John Mylopoulos University of Ottawa
Ninghui Li
Ninghui Li Purdue University West Lafayette
Ting Yu
Ting Yu Mohamed bin Zayed University of Artificial Intelligence
Jaime G. Carbonell
Jaime G. Carbonell Carnegie Mellon University
José A. B. Fortes
José A. B. Fortes University of Florida
Wayne H. Ward
Wayne H. Ward University of Colorado Boulder
Don Towsley
Don Towsley University of Massachusetts Amherst
Elisa Bertino
Elisa Bertino Purdue University West Lafayette

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees can open up a range of opportunities in Computer Science. Many students start with associates degrees online, which provide a flexible and affordable pathway to launch a tech career or transition to a bachelor’s program.

For those considering graduate study, you might wonder, what masters program should I do? Selecting a degree that matches current job market demands is crucial. The right master’s can help you specialize in high-demand areas like AI, data science, or cybersecurity.

Affordability is another key issue. Numerous cheap online colleges offer accredited computer science programs that won’t break the bank. These options provide quality education while helping you manage student debt.

If you’re concerned about past academic performance, many online graduate schools with low gpa requirements are accessible to motivated students. These institutions consider the whole applicant, making advanced study possible even with a lower GPA.

Best Scientists Citing Annie I. Antón

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles