World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
49
Citations
10670
World Ranking
5849
National Ranking
349

Neil Maiden publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Neil Maiden sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 299 publications — 74th percentile

74% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Neil Maiden D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Neil Maiden sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 49 D-Index — 60th percentile

60% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Neil Maiden is affiliated with City, University of London in the United Kingdom. Their research spans multiple interdisciplinary fields with a primary focus on psychology, computer science, and social sciences. The work particularly emphasizes subfields such as experimental and cognitive psychology, developmental and educational psychology, sociology and political science, social psychology, and management of technology and innovation.

They have contributed extensively to topics including creativity in education and neuroscience, design education and practice, educational games and gamification, digital games and media, artificial intelligence in games, team dynamics and performance, and sport psychology and performance.

Neil Maiden has published in a variety of venues frequently, with multiple papers appearing in Creativity and Cognition. Other publication venues include Expert Systems, Communications of the ACM, Journalism Practice, and Journalism.

The following list includes recent academic papers authored or co-authored by Neil Maiden:

  • Designing new digital tools to augment human creative thinking at work: An application in elite sports coaching, 2022, Expert Systems
  • Digital creativity support for original journalism, 2020, Communications of the ACM
  • Automating Science Journalism Tasks: Emerging Opportunities, 2023, Journalism Practice

Among frequent co-authors collaborating with Neil Maiden are Konstantinos Zachos, James Lockerbie, Amanda Brown, Lars Nyre, and Alex Wolf.

Their interdisciplinary approach integrates insights from psychology and technology to address challenges in creativity and digital media, often emphasizing the practical applications of digital tools and artificial intelligence. The topics of creativity and team performance recur throughout their body of work, underscoring an interest in how technology can support collaborative and innovative practices in diverse contexts such as education, journalism, and sports coaching.

Best Publications

  • Requirements engineering paper classification and evaluation criteria: a proposal and a discussion

    Roel Wieringa;Neil Maiden;Nancy Mead;Colette Rolland

  • Supporting scenario-based requirements engineering

    A.G. Sutcliffe;N.A.M. Maiden;S. Minocha;D. Manuel

  • Towards a framework for integrating agile development and user-centred design

    Stephanie Chamberlain;Helen Sharp;Neil Maiden

  • Scenarios, Stories, Use Cases: Through the Systems Development Life-Cycle

    Ian F. Alexander;Neil Maiden

  • Social Modeling for Requirements Engineering

    Eric Yu;Paolo Giorgini;Neil Maiden;John Mylopoulos

  • ACRE: selecting methods for requirements acquisition

    Neil A. M. Maiden;Gordon Rugg

  • Acquiring COTS software selection requirements

    N.A.M. Maiden;C. Ncube

  • A proposal for a scenario classification framework

    C. Rolland;C. Ben Achour;C. Cauvet;J. Ralyté

  • Exploiting reusable specifications through analogy

    Neil Maiden;Alistair Sutcliffe

  • Provoking creativity: imagine what your requirements could be like

    N. Maiden;A. Gizikis;S. Robertson

  • The implementation of enterprise resource planning packages in different organisational and national cultures

    Marina Krumbholz;Neil Maiden

  • Implementing enterprise resource planning packages in different corporate and national cultures

    Marina Krumbholz;Julia Galliers;N. Coulianos;Neil A. M. Maiden

  • The domain theory for requirements engineering

    A. Sutcliffe;N. Maiden

  • Requirements Engineering as Creative Problem Solving: A Research Agenda for Idea Finding

    Neil Maiden;Sara Jones;Kristine Karlsen;Roger Neill

  • Guiding use case authoring: results of an empirical study

    C.B. Achour;C. Rolland;N.A.M. Maiden;C. Souveyet

  • CREWS-SAVRE: Scenarios for Acquiring and Validating Requirements

    N. A. M. Maiden

  • Integrating creativity into requirements processes: experiences with an air traffic management system

    N. Maiden;S. Robertson

  • Analysing the novice analyst: cognitive models in software engineering

    A. G. Sutcliffe;N. A. M. Maiden

  • Using Mobile RE Tools to Give End-Users Their Own Voice

    Norbert Seyff;Florian Graf;Neil Maiden

  • Integrating creativity workshops into structured requirements processes

    Neil Maiden;Sharon Manning;Suzanne Robertson;John Greenwood

Frequent Co-Authors

Alistair Sutcliffe
Alistair Sutcliffe University of Manchester
Eric Yu
Eric Yu University of Toronto
Paolo Giorgini
Paolo Giorgini University of Trento
John Mylopoulos
John Mylopoulos University of Ottawa
Paul Grünbacher
Paul Grünbacher Johannes Kepler University of Linz
Colette Rolland
Colette Rolland Pantheon-Sorbonne University
Xavier Franch
Xavier Franch Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya
Dimitris Apostolou
Dimitris Apostolou University of Piraeus
Lawrence Chung
Lawrence Chung The University of Texas at Dallas
Matthias Jarke
Matthias Jarke RWTH Aachen University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

When considering a degree in Computer Science, it’s valuable to explore alternative online pathways that can also lead to well-paying, future-proof careers. One popular option is pursuing quick degrees online that pay well, especially for those looking to fast-track their entry into the workforce.

For students interested in emerging technology trends, exploring the best online AI degree programs can open doors to jobs in artificial intelligence, data science, and automation—fields with growing demand and attractive salaries.

It’s also smart to research the top degrees for the future, so you can plan studies in areas offering the most job security and advancement opportunities. If you’re seeking postgraduate options, there are accessible choices among the easiest masters programs to get into, which can provide career advancement without the intense competition of highly selective programs.

Whether you want a specialized skill set, affordable tuition, or a quick route to employment, today’s online degree options in computer science and related fields offer flexible solutions for diverse goals.

Best Scientists Citing Neil Maiden

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles