World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
62
Citations
13773
World Ranking
2935
National Ranking
174

Alistair Sutcliffe publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Alistair Sutcliffe sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 312 publications — 76th percentile

76% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Alistair Sutcliffe D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Alistair Sutcliffe sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 62 D-Index — 80th percentile

80% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Alistair Sutcliffe is affiliated with the University of Manchester in the United Kingdom. Their research largely focuses on the intersection of social sciences and psychology, with notable contributions to subfields such as sociology and political science, social psychology, information systems, and education.

The scientist's work encompasses a variety of topics including the impact of technology on adolescents, human-automation interaction and safety, digital marketing and social media, technology adoption and user behaviour, attachment and relationship dynamics, child development and digital technology, as well as cognitive functions and memory.

Recent publications demonstrate engagement with these themes. Among them are:

  • "Why people choose Apps: An evaluation of the ecology and user experience of mobile applications" (2022) published in the International Journal of Human-Computer Studies
  • "Investigating the use of social media in intimate social relationships" (2022) published in Behaviour and Information Technology
  • "Assessment of non-directed computer-use behaviours in the home can indicate early cognitive impairment: A proof of principle longitudinal study" (2022) published in Aging & Mental Health
  • "Using Task Support Requirements During Socio-Technical Systems Design" (2024) published in Preprints.org
  • "A Bayesian network-based model to understand the role of soft requirements in technology acceptance" (2022) published in the Proceedings of the 37th ACM/SIGAPP Symposium on Applied Computing

Throughout their career, Sutcliffe has frequently collaborated with several researchers including Pete Sawyer, Nelly Bencomo, Luis H. Garcia Paucar, Ons Al-Shamaileh, and Robin Dunbar.

Their work is frequently published in venues such as the International Journal of Human-Computer Studies and Behaviour and Information Technology, with additional contributions appearing in Aging & Mental Health, Preprints.org, and the Proceedings of the 37th ACM/SIGAPP Symposium on Applied Computing.

Best Publications

  • Meta-design: a manifesto for end-user development

    G. Fischer;E. Giaccardi;Y. Ye;A. G. Sutcliffe

  • Supporting scenario-based requirements engineering

    A.G. Sutcliffe;N.A.M. Maiden;S. Minocha;D. Manuel

  • Interaction, usability and aesthetics: what influences users' preferences?

    Antonella De Angeli;Alistair Sutcliffe;Jan Hartmann

  • Heuristic evaluation of virtual reality applications

    Alistair G. Sutcliffe;Brian Gault

  • A proposal for a scenario classification framework

    C. Rolland;C. Ben Achour;C. Cauvet;J. Ralyté

  • Towards a theory of user judgment of aesthetics and user interface quality

    Jan Hartmann;Alistair Sutcliffe;Antonella De Angeli

  • Exploiting reusable specifications through analogy

    Neil Maiden;Alistair Sutcliffe

  • Scenario-based requirements engineering

    A. Sutcliffe

  • Towards a cognitive theory of information retrieval

    Alistair G. Sutcliffe;Mark Ennis

  • The problem of conflicting social spheres: effects of network structure on experienced tension in social network sites

    Jens Binder;Andrew Howes;Alistair Sutcliffe

  • Human-computer interface design

    A. Sutcliffe

  • User-centred requirements engineering

    Alistair Sutcliffe

  • Requirements elicitation: Towards the unknown unknowns

    Alistair Sutcliffe;Pete Sawyer

  • Investigating attractiveness in web user interfaces

    Jan Hartmann;Alistair Sutcliffe;Antonella De Angeli

  • Scenario-based requirements analysis

    Alistair Sutcliffe

  • Assessing the reliability of heuristic evaluation for Web site attractiveness and usability

    A. Sutcliffe

  • On the effective use and reuse of HCI knowledge

    Alistair Sutcliffe

  • Empirical studies of end-user information searching

    A. G. Sutcliffe;M. Ennis;S. J. Watkinson

  • A comparison of usability techniques for evaluating design

    Ann Doubleday;Michele Ryan;Mark Springett;Alistair Sutcliffe

  • Evaluating the usability of virtual reality user interfaces

    A. G. Sutcliffe;K. Deol Kaur

  • Designing presentation in multimedia interfaces

    Alistair Sutcliffe;Peter Faraday

Frequent Co-Authors

Neil Maiden
Neil Maiden City, University of London
Pete Sawyer
Pete Sawyer Aston University
Antonella De Angeli
Antonella De Angeli Free University of Bozen-Bolzano
Robin I. M. Dunbar
Robin I. M. Dunbar University of Oxford
Rob Procter
Rob Procter University of Warwick
Matthias Jarke
Matthias Jarke RWTH Aachen University
Paul Rayson
Paul Rayson Lancaster University
Xiao-Jun Zeng
Xiao-Jun Zeng University of Manchester
John M. Carroll
John M. Carroll University of Sussex
Stephan C. Henneberg
Stephan C. Henneberg Queen Mary University of London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering a Computer Science degree opens doors to a wide range of related disciplines with strong career prospects. Many students choose to augment their studies with fields like engineering, data science, or physics, often taking advantage of flexible online learning options.

For those interested in design, manufacturing, or robotics, an online degree for mechanical engineering offers a strong foundation. If analytical thinking and foundational sciences appeal to you, pursuing a bachelor of science in physics online can strengthen your technical skills.

With the demand for data-driven decision-making on the rise, finding what is the cheapest data science course in the us? is now more accessible than ever. Data science courses help you build expertise in big data, statistics, and programming. Meanwhile, tech-focused students may prefer exploring electrical engineering degree online admissions to enter industries such as electronics or renewable energy.

Each of these pathways can be completed online, making it easier to align your studies with your career goals and schedule. Explore your options to find the best fit for your future in technology.

Best Scientists Citing Alistair Sutcliffe

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles