World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
39
Citations
6329
World Ranking
9778
National Ranking
290

Antonella De Angeli publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Antonella De Angeli sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 250 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 560 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 424 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 378 scientists 262–271 publications: 300 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 174 publications — 36th percentile

36% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Antonella De Angeli D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Antonella De Angeli sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 984 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 969 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 765 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 517 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 33rd percentile

33% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Antonella De Angeli is affiliated with the Free University of Bozen-Bolzano in Italy. Their research spans multiple fields within social sciences and psychology, with a notable focus on human-computer interaction and developmental psychology. The primary fields of study include Social Sciences and Psychology, while subfields encompass Sociology and Political Science, Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, Human-Computer Interaction, Developmental and Educational Psychology, and Safety Research.

Their body of work addresses key themes such as Innovative Human-Technology Interaction, Digital Games and Media, Reading and Literacy Development, Technology Use by Older Adults, Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology, Ethics and Social Impacts of AI, and Gender, Feminism, and Media.

They have contributed articles to a range of publication venues, with frequent appearances in:

  • Nature Human Behaviour
  • International Journal of Human-Computer Studies
  • Designing Interactive Systems Conference
  • Disability & Society
  • Multimedia Tools and Applications

Recent papers include:

  • Desires for active ageing technology (2020), International Journal of Human-Computer Studies
  • Reporting non-consensual pornography: clarity, efficiency and distress (2023), Multimedia Tools and Applications

Other notable publications coauthored or associated with their research network include:

  • Enhancing reading skills through a video game mixing action mechanics and cognitive training (2022), Nature Human Behaviour
  • Learning at school through to university: the educational experiences of students with dyslexia at one UK higher education institution (2020), Disability & Society
  • Engaging Children in Story Co-Creation for Effective Serious Games (2021), Sustainability

Antonella De Angeli frequently collaborates with several co-authors, including:

  • María Menéndez-Blanco
  • Angela Pasqualotto
  • Zeno Menestrina
  • Paola Venuti
  • Federico Bomba

Best Publications

  • Integration and synchronization of input modes during multimodal human-computer interaction

    Sharon Oviatt;Antonella DeAngeli;Karen Kuhn

  • Is a picture really worth a thousand words? Exploring the feasibility of graphical authentication systems

    Antonella De Angeli;Lynne Coventry;Graham Johnson;Karen Renaud

  • Interaction, usability and aesthetics: what influences users' preferences?

    Antonella De Angeli;Alistair Sutcliffe;Jan Hartmann

  • Towards a theory of user judgment of aesthetics and user interface quality

    Jan Hartmann;Alistair Sutcliffe;Antonella De Angeli

  • Applying user centred and participatory design approaches to commercial product development

    Christopher R. Wilkinson;Antonella De Angeli

  • Trust in online advice

    Pamela Briggs;Bryan Burford;Antonella De Angeli;Paula Lynch

  • Investigating attractiveness in web user interfaces

    Jan Hartmann;Alistair Sutcliffe;Antonella De Angeli

  • Explore! possibilities and challenges of mobile learning

    Maria F. Costabile;Antonella De Angeli;Rosa Lanzilotti;Carmelo Ardito

  • Usability and biometric verification at the ATM interface

    Lynne Coventry;Antonella De Angeli;Graham Johnson

  • eLSE Methodology: A Systematic Approach to the e-Learning Systems Evaluation

    Rosa Lanzilotti;Carmelo Ardito;Maria Francesca Costabile;Antonella De Angeli

  • Gender affordances of conversational agents

    Sheryl Brahnam;Antonella De Angeli

  • Pleasure versus efficiency in user interfaces: towards an involvement framework

    Antonella De Angeli;Paula Lynch;Graham I. Johnson

  • I hate you! Disinhibition with virtual partners

    Antonella De Angeli;Sheryl Brahnam

  • Computation of Interface Aesthetics

    Aliaksei Miniukovich;Antonella De Angeli

  • The unfriendly user: exploring social reactions to chatterbots

    Antonella De Angeli;Graham I. Johnson;Lynne Coventry

  • Introducing ATMs in India: a contextual inquiry

    Antonella De Angeli;Uday Athavankar;Anirudha Joshi;Lynne Coventry

  • VIP: a visual approach to user authentication

    Antonella De Angeli;Mike Coutts;Lynne Coventry;Graham I. Johnson

  • Framing the user experience: information biases on website quality judgement

    Jan Hartmann;Antonella De Angeli;Alistair Sutcliffe

  • Personalisation and trust: a reciprocal relationship?

    Pamela Briggs;Brad Simpson;Antonella De Angeli

  • Public design of digital commons in urban places

    Maurizio Teli;Silvia Bordin;María Menéndez Blanco;Giusi Orabona

  • A user-centered approach to user modeling

    Daniela Petrelli;Antonella De Angeli;Gregorio Convertino

Frequent Co-Authors

Alistair Sutcliffe
Alistair Sutcliffe University of Manchester
Maria Francesca Costabile
Maria Francesca Costabile University of Bari Aldo Moro
Massimo Zancanaro
Massimo Zancanaro University of Trento
Sheryl Brahnam
Sheryl Brahnam Missouri State University
Florian Daniel
Florian Daniel Polytechnic University of Milan
Fabio Casati
Fabio Casati University of Trento
Fausto Giunchiglia
Fausto Giunchiglia University of Trento
Paola Venuti
Paola Venuti University of Trento
Domenico Prattichizzo
Domenico Prattichizzo University of Siena
Roberto Passerone
Roberto Passerone University of Trento

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in Computer Science unlocks flexibility, affordability, and faster entry into a high-demand field. Many prospective students consider cheap online colleges to help manage the cost of earning a degree, especially for those on a budget.

Admissions processes are also becoming more inclusive. Some of the best colleges for low gpa now offer reputable online programs, making Computer Science degrees more accessible to students with diverse academic backgrounds.

Accelerated options are available for those who wish to complete their studies faster. The fastest computer science degree programs can help you finish sooner and step into your chosen career quickly.

The skills you'll gain can open doors to various sectors. Just as those asking what can you do with an environmental science degree discover multiple career options, Computer Science graduates may find opportunities in tech, healthcare, finance, or government roles. Flexible online learning pathways allow you to tailor your education to your career goals.

Best Scientists Citing Antonella De Angeli

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles