World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
45
Citations
8066
World Ranking
7214
National Ranking
3150

Rudolf Eigenmann publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rudolf Eigenmann sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 218 publications — 53rd percentile

53% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Rudolf Eigenmann D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rudolf Eigenmann sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 45 D-Index — 51st percentile

51% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Rudolf Eigenmann is affiliated with the University of Delaware in the United States. The primary area of research falls within Computer Science, featuring 22 publications, with significant focus on subfields such as Hardware and Architecture, Computer Networks and Communications, Information Systems, Information Systems and Management, and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics.

The scientist's work involves various topics, including:

  • Parallel Computing and Optimization Techniques
  • Distributed and Parallel Computing Systems
  • Cloud Computing and Resource Management
  • Scientific Computing and Data Management
  • Embedded Systems Design Techniques
  • Advanced Data Storage Technologies
  • Software Engineering Research

Eigenmann has contributed to multiple recent papers, addressing diverse aspects of computing and optimization. These include:

  • Automatic and Interactive Program Parallelization Using the Cetus Source to Source Compiler Infrastructure v2.0, 2022, Electronics
  • Portal for high-precision atomic data and computation, 2025, Computer Physics Communications
  • Should AI Optimize Your Code? A Comparative Study of Classical Optimizing Compilers Versus Current Large Language Models, 2024, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Exchanging Best Practices for Supporting Computational and Data-Intensive Research, The Xpert Network, 2022, Practice and Experience in Advanced Research Computing
  • Exchanging Best Practices and Tools for Supporting Computational and Data-Intensive Research, The Xpert Network, 2021, arXiv (Cornell University)

Frequent publication venues include:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Electronics
  • Computer Physics Communications
  • Practice and Experience in Advanced Research Computing
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)

Eigenmann has collaborated extensively with several coauthors. The most frequent include:

  • Parinaz Barakhshan
  • Akshay Bhosale
  • Bindiya Arora
  • M. S. Safronova
  • Miguel Romero Rosas

Best Publications

  • OpenMP to GPGPU: a compiler framework for automatic translation and optimization

    Seyong Lee;Seung-Jai Min;Rudolf Eigenmann

  • Parallel programming with Polaris

    W. Blume;R. Doallo;R. Doallo;R. Doallo;R. Eigenmann;R. Eigenmann;J. Grout

  • Automatic program parallelization

    U. Banerjee;R. Eigenmann;A. Nicolau;D.A. Padua

  • OpenMPC: Extended OpenMP Programming and Tuning for GPUs

    Seyong Lee;Rudolf Eigenmann

  • SPEComp: A New Benchmark Suite for Measuring Parallel Computer Performance

    Vishal Aslot;Max J. Domeika;Rudolf Eigenmann;Greg Gaertner

  • Cetus: A Source-to-Source Compiler Infrastructure for Multicores

    C. Dave;Hansang Bae;Seung-Jai Min;Seyong Lee

  • Cetus – An Extensible Compiler Infrastructure for Source-to-Source Transformation

    Sang Ik Lee;Troy A. Johnson;Rudolf Eigenmann

  • Fast and Effective Orchestration of Compiler Optimizations for Automatic Performance Tuning

    Zhelong Pan;Rudolf Eigenmann

  • Performance analysis pf parallelizing compilers on the Perfect Benchmarks programs

    W. Blume;R. Eigenmann

  • The range test: a dependence test for symbolic, non-linear expressions

    William Blume;Rudolf Eigenmann

  • Experience in the Automatic Parallelization of Four Perfect-Benchmark Programs

    Rudolf Eigenmann;Jay Hoeflinger;Z. Li;David A. Padua

  • Polaris: The Next Generation in Parallelizing Compilers

    Bill Blume;Rudolf Eigenmann;Keith Faigin;John Grout

  • On the automatic parallelization of the Perfect Benchmarks(R)

    R. Eigenmann;J. Hoeflinger;D. Padua

  • Min-cut program decomposition for thread-level speculation

    Troy A. Johnson;Rudolf Eigenmann;T. N. Vijaykumar

  • Idiom recognition in the Polaris parallelizing compiler

    Bill Pottenger;Rudolf Eigenmann

  • Automatic Detection of Parallelism: A grand challenge for high performance computing

    W. Blume;R. Eigenmann;J. Hoeflinger;D. Padua

  • Symbolic range propagation

    W. Blume;R. Eigenmann

  • McrEngine: a scalable checkpointing system using data-aware aggregation and compression

    Tanzima Zerin Islam;Kathryn Mohror;Saurabh Bagchi;Adam Moody

  • Towards automatic translation of OpenMP to MPI

    Ayon Basumallik;Rudolf Eigenmann

  • Polaris: Improving the Effectiveness of Parallelizing Compilers

    William Blume;Rudolf Eigenmann;Keith Faigin;John Grout

  • Automatic program parallelization : Languages and compilers

    Uptal Banerjee;R. Eigenmann;A. Nicolau;D. A. Padua

Frequent Co-Authors

David Padua
David Padua University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
José A. B. Fortes
José A. B. Fortes University of Florida
Samuel P. Midkiff
Samuel P. Midkiff Purdue University West Lafayette
Saurabh Bagchi
Saurabh Bagchi Purdue University West Lafayette
Lawrence Rauchwerger
Lawrence Rauchwerger University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
T. N. Vijaykumar
T. N. Vijaykumar Purdue University West Lafayette
Alok Choudhary
Alok Choudhary Northwestern University
Howard Jay Siegel
Howard Jay Siegel Colorado State University
Anthony A. Maciejewski
Anthony A. Maciejewski Colorado State University
Babak Falsafi
Babak Falsafi École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online education opens up new possibilities for students interested in Computer Science in the USA. For those seeking to combine technical skills with business acumen, pursuing an online mba cheap can offer an affordable route to leadership roles in tech-driven industries.

Time-efficient programs are also in demand. Options like a 1 year masters program allow students to accelerate their qualifications and enter the job market faster.

Choosing the right online degree can also influence earning potential. Many students are interested in online degrees that pay well, allowing them to secure lucrative roles in areas such as data science, cybersecurity, and artificial intelligence.

If your focus is on advanced technology, consider the cheapest online master's in artificial intelligence. This path can provide the specialized skills needed to thrive in cutting-edge tech fields, all at a lower cost.

Best Scientists Citing Rudolf Eigenmann

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles