World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
37
Citations
10958
World Ranking
10473
National Ranking
4382

Barbara Chapman publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Barbara Chapman sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 311 publications — 76th percentile

76% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Barbara Chapman D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Barbara Chapman sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Barbara Chapman is affiliated with Stony Brook University in the United States. Their primary research domain is in computer science, with additional contributions to engineering. The main subfields of study include computer networks and communications, hardware and architecture, information systems, artificial intelligence, and electrical and electronic engineering.

Their research covers a broad range of topics, prominently featuring parallel computing and optimization techniques, distributed and parallel computing systems, cloud computing and resource management, advanced data storage technologies, modular robots and swarm intelligence, molecular communication and nanonetworks, and IoT and edge/fog computing.

Barbara Chapman has published extensively, with 71 publications in computer science and 12 in engineering. Frequent publication venues include:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Parallel Computing
  • 2022 IEEE International Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium (IPDPS)
  • Applied Sciences
  • The Journal of Computational Science Education

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Barbara Chapman include:

  • "OpenMP application experiences: Porting to accelerated nodes" (2021), published in Parallel Computing
  • "Co-Designing an OpenMP GPU Runtime and Optimizations for Near-Zero Overhead Execution" (2022), presented at the 2022 IEEE International Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium (IPDPS)
  • "Cross-Feature Transfer Learning for Efficient Tensor Program Generation" (2024), published in Applied Sciences
  • "How to Build a Quantum Supercomputer: Scaling from Hundreds to Millions of Qubits" (2024), available on arXiv (Cornell University)
  • "FreeCompilerCamp.org: Training for OpenMP Compiler Development from Cloud" (2020), published in The Journal of Computational Science Education

Barbara Chapman frequently collaborates with a group of researchers, including Johannes Doerfert, Shilei Tian, Abid M. Malik, Meifeng Lin, and Baodi Shan.

In addition to research papers, Barbara Chapman has contributed to academic literature through book publications. Notably, they authored "Languages and Compilers for Parallel Computing" published by Springer Science+Business Media in 2022.

Best Publications

  • Using OpenMP: Portable Shared Memory Parallel Programming

    Barbara Chapman;Gabriele Jost;Ruud van der Pas

  • Supercompilers for parallel and vector computers

    Hans Zima;Barbara Chapman

  • The International Exascale Software Project roadmap

    Jack Dongarra;Pete Beckman;Terry Moore;Patrick Aerts

  • Professional CUDA C Programming

    John Cheng;Max Grossman;Ty McKercher;Barbara Chapman

  • Using OpenMP: Portable Shared Memory Parallel Programming (Scientific and Engineering Computation)

    Barbara Chapman;Gabriele Jost;Ruud van der Pas

  • Programming in Vienna Fortran

    Barbara Chapman;Piyush Mehrotra;Hans Zima

  • Introducing OpenSHMEM: SHMEM for the PGAS community

    Barbara Chapman;Tony Curtis;Swaroop Pophale;Stephen Poole

  • High performance computing using MPI and OpenMP on multi-core parallel systems

    Haoqiang Jin;Dennis Jespersen;Piyush Mehrotra;Rupak Biswas

  • Compiling for distributed-memory systems

    H.P. Zima;B.M. Chapman

  • OpenUH: an optimizing, portable OpenMP compiler

    Chunhua Liao;Oscar R. Hernandez;Barbara M. Chapman;Wenguang Chen

  • Vienna Fortran—a Fortran language extension for distributed memory multiprocessors

    Barbara M. Chapman;Piyush Mehrotra;Hans P. Zima

  • Openmp Shared Memory Parallel Programming

    Matthias S. Mueller;Barbara M. Chapman;Bronis R. de Supinski;Allen D. Malony

  • Early Experiences with the OpenMP Accelerator Model

    Chunhua Liao;Yonghong Yan;Bronis R. de Supinski;Daniel J. Quinlan

  • Vienna Fortran - A Language Specification. Version 1.1

    Hans Zima;Peter Brezany;Barbara Chapman;Piyush Mehrotra

  • Extending HPF for Advanced Data-Parallel Applications

    B. Chapman;H. Zima;P. Mehrotra

  • Vienna-Fortran/HPF extensions for sparse and irregular problems and their compilation

    M. Ujaldon;E.L. Zapata;B.M. Chapman;H.P. Zima

  • Opusc A Coordination Language for Multidisciplinary Applications

    Barbara Chapman;Matthew Haines;Piyush Mehrota;Hans Zima

  • Vienna Fortran 90

    S. Benkner;B.M. Chapman;H.P. Zima

  • Dynamic data distributions in Vienna Fortran

    Barbara Chapman;Hans Moritsch;Piyush Mehrotra;Hans Zima

  • A Software Architecture for Multidisciplinary Applications: Integrating Task and Data Parallelism

    Barbara M. Chapman;Piyush Mehrotra;John Van Rosendale;Hans P. Zima

  • Extreme Heterogeneity 2018 - Productive Computational Science in the Era of Extreme Heterogeneity: Report for DOE ASCR Workshop on Extreme Heterogeneity

    Jeffrey S Vetter;Ron Brightwell;Maya Gokhale;Pat McCormick

Frequent Co-Authors

Bronis R. de Supinski
Bronis R. de Supinski Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
Allen D. Malony
Allen D. Malony University of Oregon
Weimin Zheng
Weimin Zheng Tsinghua University
Jeffrey S. Vetter
Jeffrey S. Vetter Oak Ridge National Laboratory
Vivek Sarkar
Vivek Sarkar Georgia Institute of Technology
Guang R. Gao
Guang R. Gao University of Delaware
Eduard Ayguadé
Eduard Ayguadé Barcelona Supercomputing Center
Jack Dongarra
Jack Dongarra University of Tennessee at Knoxville
Laurence T. Yang
Laurence T. Yang St. Francis Xavier University
Steven J.M. Jones
Steven J.M. Jones University of British Columbia

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring computer science in the USA opens doors to several allied disciplines and lucrative career opportunities. Many students interested in this field also consider closely related programs available online, often for increased flexibility and affordability.

Those with an interest in engineering can look into an online degree in mechanical engineering or explore the best online electrical engineering programs USA. Both offer strong technical foundations and share core concepts with computer science.

Students fascinated by theory and research may pursue an online bachelor's degree in physics, which can complement skills learned in computer science.

For those targeting rapidly growing industries, the cheapest data science masters in usa can be a strategic pathway. Data science blends analytical and computational skills for diverse career prospects.

Choosing one of these degrees can expand your expertise, enhance your employability, and allow you to specialize in competitive sectors that value computer science knowledge.

Best Scientists Citing Barbara Chapman

Trending Scientists