World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Mathematics

D-Index
45
Citations
9235
World Ranking
1461
National Ranking
8

Pavel Pudlák publication distribution in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mathematics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Pavel Pudlák sits on this spectrum.

42–46 publications: 3 scientists 47–51 publications: 5 scientists 52–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–61 publications: 20 scientists 62–66 publications: 14 scientists 67–71 publications: 25 scientists 72–76 publications: 19 scientists 77–81 publications: 35 scientists 82–86 publications: 50 scientists 87–91 publications: 60 scientists 92–96 publications: 86 scientists 97–101 publications: 84 scientists 102–106 publications: 83 scientists 107–111 publications: 90 scientists 112–116 publications: 99 scientists 117–121 publications: 90 scientists 122–126 publications: 91 scientists 127–131 publications: 109 scientists 132–136 publications: 110 scientists 137–141 publications: 98 scientists 142–146 publications: 112 scientists 147–151 publications: 102 scientists 152–156 publications: 88 scientists 157–161 publications: 106 scientists 162–166 publications: 83 scientists 167–171 publications: 102 scientists 172–176 publications: 77 scientists 177–181 publications: 81 scientists 182–186 publications: 78 scientists 187–191 publications: 71 scientists 192–196 publications: 92 scientists 197–201 publications: 64 scientists 202–206 publications: 69 scientists 207–211 publications: 64 scientists 212–216 publications: 62 scientists 217–221 publications: 58 scientists 222–226 publications: 53 scientists 227–231 publications: 50 scientists 232–236 publications: 46 scientists 237–241 publications: 46 scientists 242–246 publications: 46 scientists 247–251 publications: 43 scientists 252–256 publications: 29 scientists 257–261 publications: 45 scientists 262–266 publications: 30 scientists 267–271 publications: 33 scientists 272–276 publications: 34 scientists 277–281 publications: 30 scientists 282–286 publications: 31 scientists 287–291 publications: 21 scientists 292–296 publications: 34 scientists 297–301 publications: 26 scientists 302–306 publications: 10 scientists 307–311 publications: 17 scientists 312–316 publications: 23 scientists 317–321 publications: 13 scientists 322–326 publications: 16 scientists 327–331 publications: 26 scientists 332–336 publications: 13 scientists 337–341 publications: 13 scientists 342–346 publications: 16 scientists 347–351 publications: 17 scientists 352–356 publications: 12 scientists 357–361 publications: 18 scientists 362–366 publications: 18 scientists 367–371 publications: 9 scientists 372–376 publications: 11 scientists 377–381 publications: 8 scientists 382–386 publications: 8 scientists 387–391 publications: 9 scientists 392–396 publications: 9 scientists 397–401 publications: 8 scientists 402–406 publications: 11 scientists 407–411 publications: 6 scientists 412–416 publications: 6 scientists 417–421 publications: 9 scientists 422–426 publications: 8 scientists 427–431 publications: 5 scientists 432–436 publications: 8 scientists 437–441 publications: 8 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 4 scientists 452–456 publications: 4 scientists 457–461 publications: 2 scientists 462–466 publications: 2 scientists 467–471 publications: 4 scientists 472–476 publications: 3 scientists 477–481 publications: 3 scientists 482–486 publications: 6 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 5 scientists 497–501 publications: 5 scientists 502–506 publications: 1 scientists 507–511 publications: 6 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 1 scientists 522–526 publications: 3 scientists 527–531 publications: 1 scientists 532–536 publications: 4 scientists 537+ publications: 100 scientists
42 publications 537+

This scientist: 199 publications — 62nd percentile

62% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 537 publications or more.

Pavel Pudlák D-index placement in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mathematics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Pavel Pudlák sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 174 scientists 31 D-Index: 151 scientists 32 D-Index: 174 scientists 33 D-Index: 117 scientists 34 D-Index: 136 scientists 35 D-Index: 127 scientists 36 D-Index: 145 scientists 37 D-Index: 153 scientists 38 D-Index: 150 scientists 39 D-Index: 150 scientists 40 D-Index: 138 scientists 41 D-Index: 136 scientists 42 D-Index: 93 scientists 43 D-Index: 108 scientists 44 D-Index: 115 scientists 45 D-Index: 112 scientists 46 D-Index: 103 scientists 47 D-Index: 75 scientists 48 D-Index: 59 scientists 49 D-Index: 67 scientists 50 D-Index: 60 scientists 51 D-Index: 57 scientists 52 D-Index: 59 scientists 53 D-Index: 62 scientists 54 D-Index: 60 scientists 55 D-Index: 50 scientists 56 D-Index: 42 scientists 57 D-Index: 54 scientists 58 D-Index: 50 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 41 scientists 61 D-Index: 35 scientists 62 D-Index: 40 scientists 63 D-Index: 21 scientists 64 D-Index: 31 scientists 65 D-Index: 27 scientists 66 D-Index: 29 scientists 67 D-Index: 19 scientists 68 D-Index: 25 scientists 69 D-Index: 17 scientists 70 D-Index: 18 scientists 71 D-Index: 12 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 13 scientists 74 D-Index: 18 scientists 75 D-Index: 9 scientists 76 D-Index: 11 scientists 77 D-Index: 10 scientists 78 D-Index: 9 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 10 scientists 82 D-Index: 5 scientists 83 D-Index: 5 scientists 84 D-Index: 13 scientists 85 D-Index: 6 scientists 86+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 86+

This scientist: 45 D-Index — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 86 D-Index or more.

Overview

Pavel Pudlák is affiliated with the Czech Academy of Sciences in the Czech Republic. Their research primarily spans the fields of Computer Science and Mathematics, contributing extensively to topics related to computational theory and mathematical foundations.

The scientist's main fields of study include:

  • Computer Science
  • Mathematics

Within these domains, their subfields of study cover:

  • Computational Theory and Mathematics
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics
  • Geometry and Topology
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

The primary research topics addressed in their work encompass:

  • Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms
  • Limits and Structures in Graph Theory
  • Complexity and Algorithms in Graphs
  • Machine Learning and Algorithms
  • Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge
  • Advanced Topology and Set Theory
  • Advanced Graph Theory Research

Pavel Pudlák has published in a variety of venues, with frequent presence in:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (Schloss Dagstuhl)
  • COMBINATORICA
  • Theory of Computing Systems
  • Annals of Pure and Applied Logic

Recent peer-reviewed papers include:

  • "Linear Branching Programs and Directional Affine Extractors," 2022, Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (Schloss Dagstuhl)
  • "Extractors for Small Zero-Fixing Sources," 2022, COMBINATORICA
  • "Santha-Vazirani sources, deterministic condensers and very strong extractors," 2020, Theory of Computing Systems
  • "The canonical pairs of bounded depth Frege systems," 2020, Annals of Pure and Applied Logic
  • "Depth-d Frege Systems Are Not Automatable Unless = NP," 2024, Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (Schloss Dagstuhl)

Frequent collaborators of Pavel Pudlák include:

  • Vojtěch Rödl
  • Navid Talebanfard
  • Svyatoslav Gryaznov
  • Pavel Dvořák
  • Lukáš Folwarczný

Best Publications

  • Metamathematics of First-Order Arithmetic

    Petr Hájek;Pavel Pudlák

  • Lower Bounds for Resolution and Cutting Plane Proofs and Monotone Computations

    Pavel Pudlák

  • Threshold circuits of bounded depth

    András Hajnal;András Hajnal;Wolfgang Maass;Wolfgang Maass;Pavel Pudlák;Pavel Pudlák;György Turán;György Turán

  • Threshold circuits of bounded depth

    Andras Hajnal;Wolfgang Maass;Pavel Pudlak;Mario Szegedy

  • An improved exponential-time algorithm for k-SAT

    Ramamohan Paturi;Pavel Pudlák;Michael E. Saks;Francis Zane

  • Satisfiability Coding Lemma.

    Ramamohan Paturi;Pavel Pudlák;Francis Zane

  • Propositional Proof Systems, the Consistency of First Order Theories and the Complexity of Computations

    Jan Krajíček;Pavel Pudlák

  • An exponential lower bound to the size of bounded depth Frege proofs of the Pigeonhole Principle

    Jan Krajíček;Pavel Pudlák;Alan Woods

  • Bounded arithmetic and the polynomial hierarchy

    Jan Krajíček;Pavel Pudlák;Gaisi Takeuti

  • Chapter VIII - The Lengths of Proofs

    Pavel Pudlák

  • An improved exponential-time algorithm for k-SAT

    R. Paturi;P. Pudlik;M.E. Saks;F. Zane

  • Cuts, consistency statements and interpretations

    Pavel Pudlák

  • Lower Bounds on Hilbert's Nullstellensatz and Propositional Proofs

    Paul Beame;Russell Impagliazzo;Jan Krajíček;Toniann Pitassi

  • Some consequences of cryptographical conjectures for S 1 2 and EF

    Jan Krajíček;Pavel Pudlák

  • Every finite lattice can be embedded in a finite partition lattice

    Pavel Pudlák;Jiří T⫲ma

  • Lower bounds for the polynomial calculus and the Gröbner basis algorithm

    Russell Impagliazzo;Pavel Pudlák;Jiří Sgall

  • On the computational power of depth-2 circuits with threshold and modulo gates

    Matthias Krause;Pavel Pudlák

  • Exponential lower bounds for the pigeonhole principle

    Paul Beame;Russell Impagliazzo;Jan Krajíček;Toniann Pitassi

  • Proof complexity in algebraic systems and bounded depth Frege systems with modular counting

    S. Buss;R. Impagliazzo;J. Krajíček;P. Pudlák

  • Quantified propositional calculi and fragments of bounded arithmetic

    Jan Krajíček;Pavel Pudlák

  • Lower Bounds for the Polynomial Calculus and the Groebner Basis Algorithm

    Russell Impagliazzo;Pavel Pudlák;Jirí Sgall

Frequent Co-Authors

Petr Hájek
Petr Hájek Czech Academy of Sciences
Samuel R. Buss
Samuel R. Buss University of California, San Diego
Ramamohan Paturi
Ramamohan Paturi University of California, San Diego
Russell Impagliazzo
Russell Impagliazzo University of California, San Diego
Noga Alon
Noga Alon Tel Aviv University
Paul Beame
Paul Beame University of Washington
Vojtěch Rödl
Vojtěch Rödl Emory University
Wolfgang Maass
Wolfgang Maass Graz University of Technology
Toniann Pitassi
Toniann Pitassi Columbia University
Michael Saks
Michael Saks Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring related online degrees can complement your mathematics studies by broadening career opportunities. For those interested in business applications, the fastest MBA programs online offer accelerated paths to leadership roles, allowing students to quickly gain management skills alongside analytical expertise.

Marketing professionals with a strong mathematical background are in demand, and pursuing a master's degree in marketing can open doors to strategic roles that leverage data analytics and consumer insights.

If efficiency matters, consider exploring the one year MBA options, which combine rigor and speed, allowing math graduates to quickly pivot into business environments.

Additionally, flexibility in education is key. Many programs allow course credit transfer, and understanding can you transfer MBA credits can help students save time and resources while advancing their degrees.

Best Scientists Citing Pavel Pudlák

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles