World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
38
Citations
4892
World Ranking
10383
National Ranking
520

Sebastian Faust publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sebastian Faust sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 96 publications — 7th percentile

7% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Sebastian Faust D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sebastian Faust sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Sebastian Faust is affiliated with the Technical University of Darmstadt in Germany and has contributed extensively to the field of computer science. Their research spans multiple subfields, with a significant focus on cryptography and related areas.

Their main fields of study include:

  • Computer Science

Within this broader field, they have worked on several specialized subfields:

  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Information Systems
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
  • Computer Networks and Communications
  • Hardware and Architecture

The main topics covered in their work emphasize security and cryptography:

  • Cryptography and Data Security
  • Cryptographic Implementations and Security
  • Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
  • Chaos-based Image/Signal Encryption
  • Coding theory and cryptography
  • Physical Unclonable Functions (PUFs) and Hardware Security
  • Distributed systems and fault tolerance

Notable recent publications by Sebastian Faust include:

  • Continuously Non-malleable Codes in the Split-State Model, 2020, Journal of Cryptology
  • Lower Bounds for Off-Chain Protocols: Exploring the Limits of Plasma, 2021, Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (Schloss Dagstuhl)
  • Provable Secure Parallel Gadgets, 2023, IACR Transactions on Cryptographic Hardware and Embedded Systems
  • MOE: Multiplication Operated Encryption with Trojan Resilience, 2021, IACR Transactions on Symmetric Cryptology
  • Prisma: A Tierless Language for Enforcing Contract-Client Protocols in Decentralized Applications (Extended Abstract), 2022, arXiv (Cornell University)

Their publications have appeared frequently in several venues, including:

  • IACR Transactions on Cryptographic Hardware and Embedded Systems
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Journal of Cryptology
  • Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (Schloss Dagstuhl)
  • IACR Transactions on Symmetric Cryptology

Sebastian Faust often collaborates with the following coauthors:

  • David Kretzler
  • Maximilian Orlt
  • Benjamin Schlosser
  • Carmit Hazay
  • François-Xavier Standaert

Additionally, Sebastian Faust has contributed to book publications with Springer Science+Business Media, including two editions of Public-Key Cryptography - PKC 2022.

Best Publications

  • Proofs of Space

    Stefan Dziembowski;Sebastian Faust;Vladimir Kolmogorov;Krzysztof Z Pietrzak

  • Protecting circuits from leakage: the computationally-bounded and noisy cases

    Sebastian Faust;Tal Rabin;Leonid Reyzin;Eran Tromer

  • General State Channel Networks

    Stefan Dziembowski;Sebastian Faust;Kristina Hostáková

  • FairSwap: How To Fairly Exchange Digital Goods

    Stefan Dziembowski;Lisa Eckey;Sebastian Faust

  • Unifying Leakage Models: From Probing Attacks to Noisy Leakage

    Alexandre Duc;Stefan Dziembowski;Stefan Dziembowski;Sebastian Faust

  • Perun: Virtual Payment Hubs over Cryptocurrencies

    Stefan Dziembowski;Lisa Eckey;Sebastian Faust;Daniel Malinowski

  • Making Masking Security Proofs Concrete - Or How to Evaluate the Security of any Leaking Device

    Alexandre Duc;Sebastian Faust;Sebastian Faust;François-Xavier Standaert

  • Leakage-resilient signatures

    Sebastian Faust;Eike Kiltz;Krzysztof Pietrzak;Guy N. Rothblum

  • Making Masking Security Proofs Concrete

    Alexandre Duc;Sebastian Faust;François-Xavier Standaert

  • Parallel Implementations of Masking Schemes and the Bounded Moment Leakage Model

    Gilles Barthe;François Dupressoir;Sebastian Faust;Benjamin Grégoire

  • On the Non-malleability of the Fiat-Shamir Transform.

    Sebastian Faust;Markulf Kohlweiss;Giorgia Azzurra Marson;Daniele Venturi

  • Secure two-party computation with low communication

    Ivan Damgård;Sebastian Faust;Carmit Hazay

  • Efficient Non-Malleable Codes and Key Derivation for Poly-Size Tampering Circuits

    Sebastian Faust;Pratyay Mukherjee;Daniele Venturi;Daniel Wichs

  • Continuous Non-malleable Codes

    Sebastian Faust;Pratyay Mukherjee;Jesper Buus Nielsen;Daniele Venturi

  • Composable Masking Schemes in the Presence of Physical Defaults & the Robust Probing Model

    Sebastian Faust;Vincent Grosso;Santos Merino Del Pozo;Clara Paglialonga

  • Leakage-Resilient Cryptography From the Inner-Product Extractor.

    Stefan Dziembowski;Sebastian Faust

  • Bounded Tamper Resilience: How to Go Beyond the Algebraic Barrier

    Ivan Damgård;Sebastian Faust;Pratyay Mukherjee;Daniele Venturi

  • Practical leakage-resilient symmetric cryptography

    Sebastian Faust;Krzysztof Pietrzak;Joachim Schipper

  • Multi-party Virtual State Channels

    Stefan Dziembowski;Lisa Eckey;Sebastian Faust;Julia Hesse

  • Generalized Channels from Limited Blockchain Scripts and Adaptor Signatures

    Lukas Aumayr;Oguzhan Ersoy;Andreas Erwig;Sebastian Faust

  • FastKitten: Practical Smart Contracts on Bitcoin

    Poulami Das;Lisa Eckey;Tommaso Frassetto;David Gens

  • Making Masking Security Proofs Concrete (Or How to Evaluate the Security of Any Leaking Device), Extended Version

    Alexandre Duc;Sebastian Faust;François-Xavier Standaert

Frequent Co-Authors

Stefan Dziembowski
Stefan Dziembowski University of Warsaw
François-Xavier Standaert
François-Xavier Standaert Université Catholique de Louvain
Krzysztof Pietrzak
Krzysztof Pietrzak Institute of Science and Technology Austria
Carmit Hazay
Carmit Hazay Bar-Ilan University
Jesper Buus Nielsen
Jesper Buus Nielsen Aarhus University
Ivan Damgård
Ivan Damgård Aarhus University
Eran Tromer
Eran Tromer Tel Aviv University
Leonid Reyzin
Leonid Reyzin Boston University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degree options can open up diverse pathways in computer science and related fields. Many students consider pursuing one of the most valuable masters degrees to increase job prospects and earning potential. These degrees often align with in-demand tech skills that employers are seeking.

For those looking for a quicker or more affordable route, 2 year online degrees can offer a strong foundation for entry-level roles or further study. Online programs also provide flexibility, making them attainable for working professionals or those balancing other commitments.

Budget-conscious learners should consider looking into the cheapest online degrees, which can help reduce student debt without compromising educational quality. Additionally, students concerned about GPA requirements can seek out a college that accepts low gpa, ensuring greater access to education in computer science and technology.

Whether starting out or advancing a career, these options make it easier than ever to tailor your learning journey to your personal goals and circumstances.

Best Scientists Citing Sebastian Faust

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles