World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
31
Citations
17660
World Ranking
13321
National Ranking
5328

Eugene Kolker publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Eugene Kolker sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 104 publications — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Eugene Kolker D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Eugene Kolker sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 31 D-Index — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Eugene Kolker is a researcher affiliated with New York University in the United States. Their scholarly work spans multiple fields, including medicine and mathematics.

The main areas of study for Eugene Kolker include:

  • Medicine
  • Mathematics

Within these fields, their research focuses particularly on subfields such as:

  • Infectious Diseases
  • Modeling and Simulation

The primary research topics addressed in their publications involve SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research, including COVID-19 epidemiological and clinical research studies.

  • SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
  • COVID-19 epidemiological studies
  • COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies

Eugene Kolker has published at least one paper, titled "Monte Carlo Simulations to Democratize COVID-19 Policies," in 2020. This article appeared in the journal Genetic Engineering & Biotechnology News.

Their publications have appeared in the following venue:

  • Genetic Engineering & Biotechnology News

Best Publications

  • Empirical statistical model to estimate the accuracy of peptide identifications made by MS/MS and database search.

    Andrew Keller;Alexey I. Nesvizhskii;Eugene Kolker;Ruedi Aebersold

  • A statistical model for identifying proteins by tandem mass spectrometry.

    Alexey I. Nesvizhskii;Andrew Keller;Eugene Kolker;Ruedi Aebersold

  • The minimum information about a genome sequence (MIGS) specification.

    Dawn Field;George Garrity;Tanya Gray;Norman Morrison

  • Promoting coherent minimum reporting guidelines for biological and biomedical investigations: the MIBBI project

    Chris F. Taylor;Chris F. Taylor;Dawn Field;Susanna Assunta Sansone;Susanna Assunta Sansone;Jan Aerts

  • Genome Project Standards in a New Era of Sequencing

    P. S. G. Chain;D. V. Grafham;R. S. Fulton;M. G. FitzGerald

  • Experimental protein mixture for validating tandem mass spectral analysis.

    Andrew Keller;Samuel Purvine;Alexey I. Nesvizhskii;Sergey Stolyar

  • Meeting Report: The Terabase Metagenomics Workshop and the Vision of an Earth Microbiome Project

    Jack A. Gilbert;Jack A. Gilbert;Folker Meyer;Dion Antonopoulos;Pavan Balaji

  • In-silico human genomics with GeneCards

    Gil Stelzer;Irina Dalah;Tsippi Iny Stein;Yigeal Satanower

  • Omics Data Sharing

    Dawn Field;Susanna-Assunta Sansone;Susanna-Assunta Sansone;Amanda Collis;Tim Booth

  • Genic insights from integrated human proteomics in GeneCards

    Simon Fishilevich;Shahar Zimmerman;Asher Kohn;Tsippi Iny Stein

  • Global profiling of Shewanella oneidensis MR-1: Expression of hypothetical genes and improved functional annotations

    Eugene Kolker;Alex F. Picone;Michael Y. Galperin;Margaret F. Romine

  • MOPED: Model Organism Protein Expression Database

    Eugene Kolker;Roger Higdon;Winston Haynes;Dean Welch

  • Randomized sequence databases for tandem mass spectrometry peptide and protein identification.

    Roger Higdon;Jason M. Hogan;Gerald Van Belle;Eugene Kolker

  • Differential Expression Analysis for Pathways

    Winston A. Haynes;Roger Higdon;Roger Higdon;Larissa Stanberry;Larissa Stanberry;Dwayne Collins

  • A predictive model for identifying proteins by a single peptide match

    Roger Higdon;Eugene Kolker

  • Spectral quality assessment for high-throughput tandem mass spectrometry proteomics.

    Samuel Purvine;Natali Kolker;Eugene Kolker

  • Toward More Transparent and Reproducible Omics Studies Through a Common Metadata Checklist and Data Publications

    Eugene Kolker;Vural Özdemir;Lennart Martens;William Hancock

  • Protein identification and expression analysis using mass spectrometry.

    Eugene Kolker;Roger Higdon;Jason M. Hogan

  • Integrative Analysis of Longitudinal Metabolomics Data from a Personal Multi-Omics Profile

    Larissa Stanberry;George I. Mias;Winston Haynes;Roger Higdon

  • Risk Assessment and Communication Tools for Genotype Associations with Multifactorial Phenotypes: The Concept of “Edge Effect” and Cultivating an Ethical Bridge between Omics Innovations and Society

    Vural Ozdemir;Guilherme Suarez-Kurtz;Raphaëlle Stenne;Andrew A. Somogyi

Frequent Co-Authors

Dawn Field
Dawn Field University of Oxford
Samuel O. Purvine
Samuel O. Purvine Environmental Molecular Sciences Laboratory
Nikos C. Kyrpides
Nikos C. Kyrpides Joint Genome Institute
Doron Lancet
Doron Lancet Weizmann Institute of Science
Susanna-Assunta Sansone
Susanna-Assunta Sansone University of Oxford
Alexey I. Nesvizhskii
Alexey I. Nesvizhskii University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
George M. Garrity
George M. Garrity Michigan State University
Samer Faraj
Samer Faraj McGill University
Michael Y. Galperin
Michael Y. Galperin National Institutes of Health
Jack A. Gilbert
Jack A. Gilbert University of California, San Diego

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees opens flexible, diverse pathways for a future in Computer Science. With busy schedules and financial considerations, students increasingly look for the shortest online masters degree programs. These offerings can fast-track a career transition or advancement, allowing you to gain valuable skills in less time than traditional degrees.

It's also important to choose among the most useful graduate degrees that are currently in demand. Specializations in data science, cybersecurity, and software engineering align with industry needs and can significantly boost employability.

For those just starting out or seeking foundational knowledge, 2 year online degrees provide a solid entry point into tech careers. These programs often lead to roles in IT support, web development, or as a stepping stone toward a bachelor’s degree.

Affordability is another key factor. There are many options among the cheapest online degrees that deliver quality education without a hefty price tag, making a Computer Science education accessible for more students.

Best Scientists Citing Eugene Kolker

Trending Scientists