World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
56
Citations
16330
World Ranking
14200
National Ranking
1112

Dawn Field publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dawn Field sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 163 publications — 33rd percentile

33% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Dawn Field D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dawn Field sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 56 D-Index — 28th percentile

28% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Dawn Field is affiliated with the University of Oxford in the United Kingdom. Their academic profile indicates a connection with one of the leading research institutions globally, although specific details regarding their individual research outputs are not documented here.

There are no recent papers recorded under their name, nor published works with co-authors or in particular publication venues listed. As such, no detailed information on collaborative networks or frequented academic journals is available.

Similarly, there are no records of authored books or publisher affiliations found in the profile. This absence of data limits insight into extended scholarly contributions beyond articles or conference papers.

The fields, subfields, and main topics of study associated with Dawn Field have not been specified in the available information. Without these details, it is not possible to delineate the specific areas within science or academia to which they contribute.

No awards or recognitions are documented, and it is noted that the scientist is not deceased.

Best Publications

  • The minimum information about a genome sequence (MIGS) specification.

    Dawn Field;George Garrity;Tanya Gray;Norman Morrison

  • Defining seasonal marine microbial community dynamics

    Jack A Gilbert;Jack A Gilbert;Jack A Gilbert;Joshua A Steele;J. Gregory Caporaso;Lars Steinbrück

  • Minimum information about a marker gene sequence (MIMARKS) and minimum information about any (x) sequence (MIxS) specifications.

    Pelin Yilmaz;Pelin Yilmaz;Renzo Kottmann;Dawn Field;Rob Knight;Rob Knight

  • Toward an online repository of Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) for (meta)genomic annotation.

    Samuel V. Angiuoli;Aaron Gussman;William Klimke;Guy Cochrane

  • Promoting coherent minimum reporting guidelines for biological and biomedical investigations: the MIBBI project

    Chris F. Taylor;Chris F. Taylor;Dawn Field;Susanna Assunta Sansone;Susanna Assunta Sansone;Jan Aerts

  • Toward interoperable bioscience data

    Susanna-Assunta Sansone;Philippe Rocca-Serra;Dawn Field;Eamonn Maguire

  • Genome Project Standards in a New Era of Sequencing

    P. S. G. Chain;D. V. Grafham;R. S. Fulton;M. G. FitzGerald

  • The seasonal structure of microbial communities in the Western English Channel

    Jack A. Gilbert;Dawn Field;Paul Swift;Lindsay K. Newbold

  • Detection of large numbers of novel sequences in the metatranscriptomes of complex marine microbial communities.

    Jack A. Gilbert;Dawn Field;Ying Huang;Robert A. Edwards;Robert A. Edwards

  • ISA software suite

    Philippe Rocca-Serra;Marco Brandizi;Eamonn Maguire;Eamonn Maguire;Nataliya Sklyar

  • Unlocking the potential of metagenomics through replicated experimental design

    Rob Knight;Janet Jansson;Janet Jansson;Dawn Field;Noah Fierer

  • The M5nr: a novel non-redundant database containing protein sequences and annotations from multiple sources and associated tools

    Andreas Wilke;Andreas Wilke;Travis Harrison;Travis Harrison;Jared Wilkening;Dawn Field

  • Meeting Report: The Terabase Metagenomics Workshop and the Vision of an Earth Microbiome Project

    Jack A. Gilbert;Jack A. Gilbert;Folker Meyer;Dion Antonopoulos;Pavan Balaji

  • Abundant microsatellite polymorphism in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, and the different distributions of microsatellites in eight prokaryotes and S. cerevisiae, result from strong mutation pressures and a variety of selective forces

    Dawn Field;Christopher Wills

  • Genomics in marine monitoring: new opportunities for assessing marine health status

    Sarah J. Bourlat;Angel Borja;Jack Gilbert;Martin I. Taylor

  • The Taxonomic and Functional Diversity of Microbes at a Temperate Coastal Site: A ‘Multi-Omic’ Study of Seasonal and Diel Temporal Variation

    Jack A Gilbert;Jack A Gilbert;Jack A Gilbert;Dawn Field;Paul Swift;Simon Thomas

  • Catchment-scale biogeography of riverine bacterioplankton

    Daniel S Read;Hyun S Gweon;Michael J Bowes;Lindsay K Newbold

  • Genomic Encyclopedia of Bacteria and Archaea: Sequencing a Myriad of Type Strains

    Nikos C. Kyrpides;Philip Hugenholtz;Jonathan A. Eisen;Tanja Woyke

  • Long, polymorphic microsatellites in simple organisms

    Dawn Field;Christopher Wills

  • 27. Detection of Large Numbers of Novel Sequences in the Metatranscriptomes of Complex Marine Microbial Communities

    Jack A. Gilbert;Dawn Field;Ying Huang;Robert A. Edwards

Frequent Co-Authors

Jack A. Gilbert
Jack A. Gilbert University of California, San Diego
Folker Meyer
Folker Meyer Argonne National Laboratory
Nikos C. Kyrpides
Nikos C. Kyrpides Joint Genome Institute
Frank Oliver Glöckner
Frank Oliver Glöckner Jacobs University
Susanna-Assunta Sansone
Susanna-Assunta Sansone University of Oxford
George M. Garrity
George M. Garrity Michigan State University
Rob Knight
Rob Knight University of California, San Diego
Philippe Rocca-Serra
Philippe Rocca-Serra University of Oxford
Guy Cochrane
Guy Cochrane European Bioinformatics Institute
Lynette Hirschman
Lynette Hirschman Mitre (United States)

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a background in Biology or Biochemistry opens the door to a wide range of online degree options and professional pathways. These fields often intersect with health, nutrition, and management, making online study especially appealing for those seeking flexibility.

For example, if you are interested in direct patient care, asn online nursing programs offer the foundational skills needed to launch a career in nursing, even for those just starting out. Those passionate about diet and wellness may find the best online nutrition degree programs a strong fit, helping you gain expertise in nutritional science and guidance on health promotion.

For those who aspire to leadership roles in healthcare, cahme accredited online mha programs provide robust preparation for managing healthcare systems and organizations. If you already have a nursing background and seek career advancement without extensive onsite requirements, consider a dnp program without clinical hours to develop higher-level clinical knowledge and leadership skills.

Pursuing these related online degrees can help you specialize and align your education with a rewarding career pathway in the life sciences or healthcare sector.

Best Scientists Citing Dawn Field

Recently Published Articles