World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Engineering and Technology

D-Index
55
Citations
10142
World Ranking
3040
National Ranking
196

Charles J. Banks publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Charles J. Banks sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 804+

This scientist: 235 publications — 60th percentile

60% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

Charles J. Banks D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Charles J. Banks sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 55 D-Index — 70th percentile

70% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Carbon dioxide
  • Ecology
  • Organic chemistry

Charles J. Banks focuses on Anaerobic digestion, Waste management, Biogas, Food waste and Digestate. His studies in Anaerobic digestion integrate themes in fields like Raw material, Methanogenesis, Ammonia, Waste treatment and Animal science. His work on Flue gas is typically connected to Raceway as part of general Waste management study, connecting several disciplines of science.

His Biogas study combines topics from a wide range of disciplines, such as Food science, Environmental engineering, Activated sludge, Municipal solid waste and Digestion. The various areas that Charles J. Banks examines in his Food waste study include Biodegradation and Food microbiology. In his study, Stripping, Tonne and Energy balance is inextricably linked to Biofuel, which falls within the broad field of Digestate.

His most cited work include:

  • The effect of volatile fatty acid additions on the anaerobic digestion of cellulose and glucose in batch reactors (330 citations)
  • Anaerobic digestion of source-segregated domestic food waste: Performance assessment by mass and energy balance (262 citations)
  • Thiol-functionalised mesoporous silica-coated magnetite nanoparticles for high efficiency removal and recovery of Hg from water (244 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

Charles J. Banks mainly investigates Anaerobic digestion, Waste management, Pulp and paper industry, Biogas and Environmental engineering. His studies deal with areas such as Mesophile, Food waste and Bioreactor as well as Anaerobic digestion. The Food waste study combines topics in areas such as Biodegradation and Ammonia.

His research investigates the connection between Bioreactor and topics such as Chromatography that intersect with issues in Adsorption. Much of his study explores Waste management relationship to Biomass. His work deals with themes such as Wastewater, Hydraulic retention time, Effluent, Chemical oxygen demand and Raw material, which intersect with Pulp and paper industry.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Anaerobic digestion (44.19%)
  • Waste management (34.11%)
  • Pulp and paper industry (24.81%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2012-2020)?

  • Anaerobic digestion (44.19%)
  • Pulp and paper industry (24.81%)
  • Biogas (17.83%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

Charles J. Banks mainly focuses on Anaerobic digestion, Pulp and paper industry, Biogas, Food waste and Waste management. His Anaerobic digestion research incorporates themes from Raw material, Ammonia and Mesophile. His work in the fields of Pulp and paper industry, such as Pulp, intersects with other areas such as Mathematics.

His Biogas research integrates issues from Chromatography and Mixing. The study incorporates disciplines such as Food science, Biodegradation, Hydrolysis, Kjeldahl method and Digestion in addition to Food waste. His study in the fields of Bioenergy and Biofuel under the domain of Waste management overlaps with other disciplines such as Raceway and Pre treatment.

Between 2012 and 2020, his most popular works were:

  • Evaluation of carbon dioxide mass transfer in raceway reactors for microalgae culture using flue gases. (132 citations)
  • Fluid-dynamic characterization of real-scale raceway reactors for microalgae production (102 citations)
  • Anaerobic digestion of autoclaved and untreated food waste (96 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Ecology
  • Carbon dioxide
  • Oxygen

His primary scientific interests are in Anaerobic digestion, Waste management, Food waste, Ammonia and Biogas. He has included themes like Yield, Mesophile, Raw material and Pulp and paper industry in his Anaerobic digestion study. His work on Bioenergy, Biofuel and Flue gas as part of general Waste management study is frequently linked to Raceway, bridging the gap between disciplines.

Charles J. Banks combines subjects such as Hydrolysis and Methane with his study of Food waste. His study focuses on the intersection of Biogas and fields such as Municipal solid waste with connections in the field of Particle size, Digestion, Environmental engineering and Incineration. His Digestate research focuses on Stripping and how it relates to Waste treatment.

Best Publications

  • Anaerobic digestion of source-segregated domestic food waste: Performance assessment by mass and energy balance

    Charles J. Banks;Michael Chesshire;Sonia Heaven;Rebecca Arnold

  • Trace element requirements for stable food waste digestion at elevated ammonia concentrations

    Charles J. Banks;Yue Zhang;Ying Jiang;Sonia Heaven

  • Ammonia inhibition and toxicity in anaerobic digestion: A critical review

    Ying Jiang;Ewan McAdam;Yue Zhang;Sonia Heaven

  • Thiol-functionalised mesoporous silica-coated magnetite nanoparticles for high efficiency removal and recovery of Hg from water

    Othman Hakami;Yue Zhang;Charles J. Banks

  • Potential errors in the quantitative evaluation of biogas production in anaerobic digestion processes.

    Mark Walker;Yue Zhang;Sonia Heaven;Charles Banks

  • Modeling biogas production from organic fraction of MSW co-digested with MSWI ashes in anaerobic bioreactors

    H M Lo;T A Kurniawan;M E T Sillanpää;T Y Pai

  • Evaluation of carbon dioxide mass transfer in raceway reactors for microalgae culture using flue gases.

    I. de Godos;J.L. Mendoza;F.G. Acién;E. Molina

  • Anaerobic treatment of palm oil mill effluent in a two stage up-flow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) system

    Rafael Borja;Charles J Banks;Enrique Sánchez

  • Fluid-dynamic characterization of real-scale raceway reactors for microalgae production

    J.L. Mendoza;M.R. Granados;I. de Godos;F.G. Acién

  • Biogas production from undiluted chicken manure and maize silage: A study of ammonia inhibition in high solids anaerobic digestion.

    Chen Sun;Weixing Cao;Charles J. Banks;Sonia Heaven

  • Ammonia removal in anaerobic digestion by biogas stripping: an evaluation of process alternatives using a first order rate model based on experimental findings

    Mark Walker;K. Iyer;S. Heaven;C.J. Banks

  • Influence of different aerobic pretreatments on the kinetics of anaerobic digestion of olive mill wastewater

    R. Borja;A. Martín;V. Alonso;I. García

  • Strategies for stable anaerobic digestion of vegetable waste.

    Y. Jiang;S. Heaven;C.J. Banks

  • Enhanced Performance of Hexavalent Chromium Reducing Cathodes in the Presence of Shewanella oneidensis MR-1 and Lactate

    Nikolaos Xafenias;Yue Zhang;Charles J. Banks

  • Oxygen transfer and evolution in microalgal culture in open raceways

    J.L. Mendoza;M.R. Granados;I. de Godos;F.G. Acién

  • Co-digestion of source segregated domestic food waste to improve process stability.

    Yue Zhang;Charles J. Banks;Sonia Heaven

  • Impact of different particle size distributions on anaerobic digestion of the organic fraction of municipal solid waste

    Y. Zhang;Charles J. Banks

  • Impact of the main phenolic compounds of olive mill wastewater (OMW) on the kinetics of acetoclastic methanogenesis

    Rafael Borja;José Alba;Charles J. Banks

  • Mechanism of humic acid colour removal from natural waters by fungal biomass biosorption

    J.L. Zhou;C.J. Banks

  • Anaerobic digestion of palm oil mill effluent using an up-flow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor

    R. Borja;C.J. Banks

Frequent Co-Authors

Sonia Heaven
Sonia Heaven University of Southampton
Rafael Borja
Rafael Borja Spanish National Research Council
John L. Zhou
John L. Zhou University of Technology Sydney
Ronghou Liu
Ronghou Liu Shanghai Jiao Tong University
David Bolzonella
David Bolzonella University of Verona
E. Molina Grima
E. Molina Grima University of Almería
Tonni Agustiono Kurniawan
Tonni Agustiono Kurniawan Xiamen University
Anthony V. Bridgwater
Anthony V. Bridgwater Aston University
Jukka Rintala
Jukka Rintala Tampere University
Lorenz M. Hilty
Lorenz M. Hilty University of Zurich

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Charles J. Banks

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles