World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
104
Citations
35058
World Ranking
7113
National Ranking
3735

Mark R. Haussler publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark R. Haussler sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 268 publications — 11th percentile

11% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Mark R. Haussler D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark R. Haussler sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 104 D-Index — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Mark R. Haussler is affiliated with the University of Arizona in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on the field of medicine, with particular attention to subfields such as pathology and forensic medicine, biochemistry, nephrology, endocrinology, diabetes and metabolism, and nutrition and dietetics.

The scientist has contributed significantly to studies related to vitamin D, with research intersecting areas like antioxidant activity and oxidative stress, parathyroid disorders and treatments, growth hormone and insulin-like growth factors, pomegranate compositions and health benefits, as well as paraoxonase enzyme polymorphisms.

Frequent coauthors in their work include Peter W. Jurutka, Sarah Livingston, Zhela Sabir, Carol A. Haussler, and Sanchita Mallick. Their collaborative efforts have resulted in publications in various scientific venues.

Common publication venues for Mark R. Haussler's work include The FASEB Journal, JBMR Plus, Biochemistry and Biophysics Reports, and Vitamins and hormones.

Recent papers authored or coauthored by Mark R. Haussler are:

  • Vitamin D Receptor Mediates a Myriad of Biological Actions Dependent on Its 1,25-Dihydroxyvitamin D Ligand: Distinct Regulatory Themes Revealed by Induction of Klotho and Fibroblast Growth Factor-23, 2020, JBMR Plus
  • Genomically anchored vitamin D receptor mediates an abundance of bioprotective actions elicited by its 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D hormonal ligand, 2023, Vitamins and hormones

Other notable related publications connected to the field and collaborations include:

  • Pomegranate derivative urolithin A enhances vitamin D receptor signaling to amplify serotonin-related gene induction by 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D, 2020, Biochemistry and Biophysics Reports
  • Introduction: Special Issue on Vitamin D Dedicated to the Memory of Anthony W Norman, 2020, JBMR Plus
  • Nutraceuticals Derived From Pomegranate Selectively Enhance Vitamin D Receptor Signaling to Amplify Key Vitamin D Target Genes, 2020, The FASEB Journal

Best Publications

  • The nuclear vitamin D receptor: biological and molecular regulatory properties revealed.

    M. R. Haussler;G. K. Whitfield;C. A. Haussler;J. C. Hsieh

  • Vitamin D Receptor As an Intestinal Bile Acid Sensor

    Makoto Makishima;Timothy T. Lu;Wen Xie;G. Kerr Whitfield

  • Cloning and expression of full-length cDNA encoding human vitamin D receptor.

    A. R. Baker;D. P. McDonnell;M. Hughes;T. M. Crisp

  • Estrogen binding, receptor mRNA, and biologic response in osteoblast-like osteosarcoma cells

    Barry S. Komm;Christopher M. Terpening;David J. Benz;Kimberlie A. Graeme

  • Vitamin D receptor (VDR)-mediated actions of 1α,25(OH)2vitamin D3: Genomic and non-genomic mechanisms

    Mark R. Haussler;Peter W. Jurutka;Peter W. Jurutka;Mathew Mizwicki;Anthony W. Norman

  • Molecular Mechanisms of Vitamin D Action

    Mark R. Haussler;G. Kerr Whitfield;Ichiro Kaneko;Ichiro Kaneko;Carol A. Haussler

  • Basic and Clinical Concepts Related to Vitamin D Metabolism and Action

    Mark R. Haussler;Toni A. McCain

  • Basic and clinical concepts related to vitamin D metabolism and action (second of two parts).

    Mark R. Haussler;Toni A. McCain

  • Molecular cloning of complementary DNA encoding the avian receptor for vitamin D.

    Donald P. Mcdonnell;David J. Mangelsdorf;J. Wesley Pike;Mark R. Haussler

  • 1,25-Dihydroxyvitamin D3-induced differentiation in a human promyelocytic leukemia cell line (HL-60): receptor-mediated maturation to macrophage-like cells

    D. J. Mangelsdorf;H. P. Koeffler;C. A. Donaldson;J. W. Pike

  • The polymorphic N terminus in human vitamin D receptor isoforms influences transcriptional activity by modulating interaction with transcription factor IIB

    Peter Jurutka;L. S. Remus;G. K. Whitfield;P. D. Thompson

  • Functionally relevant polymorphisms in the human nuclear vitamin D receptor gene.

    G Kerr Whitfield;Lenore S Remus;Peter W Jurutka;Heike Zitzer

  • Vitamin D Receptors: Nature and Function

    Mark R. Haussler

  • The vitamin D hormone and its nuclear receptor: molecular actions and disease states

    M. R. Haussler;C. A. Haussler;Peter Jurutka;P. D. Thompson

  • Identification and regulation of 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 receptor activity and biosynthesis of 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3. Studies in cultured bovine aortic endothelial cells and human dermal capillaries.

    J. Merke;P. Milde;S. Lewicka;U. Hugel

  • 1α,25-Dihydroxyvitamin D3 upregulates FGF23 gene expression in bone: the final link in a renal-gastrointestinal-skeletal axis that controls phosphate transport

    Olga I. Kolek;Eric R. Hines;Marci D. Jones;Loren K. LeSueur

  • Effects of retinoic acid (RA) on the growth and phenotypic expression of several human neuroblastoma cell lines

    Neil Sidell;Adrienne Altman;Mark R. Haussler;Robert C. Seeger

  • Vitamin D receptor: molecular signaling and actions of nutritional ligands in disease prevention

    Mark R. Haussler;Carol A. Haussler;Leonid Bartik;G. Kerr Whitfield

  • Retinoid X receptors stimulate and 9-cis retinoic acid inhibits 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3-activated expression of the rat osteocalcin gene.

    Paul N. Macdonald;Diane R. Dowd;Shigeo Nakajima;Michael A. Galligan

  • The Association of a Metabolite of Vitamin D3 with Intestinal Mucosa Chromatin in Vivo

    Mark R. Haussler;James F. Myrtle;Anthony W. Norman

Frequent Co-Authors

Peter W. Jurutka
Peter W. Jurutka Arizona State University
J. Wesley Pike
J. Wesley Pike University of Wisconsin–Madison
David J. Mangelsdorf
David J. Mangelsdorf The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
David J. Baylink
David J. Baylink Loma Linda University
Leonard J. Deftos
Leonard J. Deftos University of California, San Diego
Anthony W. Norman
Anthony W. Norman University of California, Riverside
Donald P. McDonnell
Donald P. McDonnell Duke University
Eugene W. Gerner
Eugene W. Gerner University of Arizona
Keiko Ozato
Keiko Ozato Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re considering a career in medicine but aren’t sure where to start, online degrees offer flexible and affordable options. For those seeking a nursing doctorate, cheapest online dnp programs can make this advanced qualification more accessible, especially if you’re mindful of both costs and commitments.

Interested in entering the workforce quickly? fast track medical programs such as accelerated LPN pathways let you get vital hands-on experience sooner, helping you start your medical career without years of traditional study.

Mental health professionals are in high demand. An online msn pmhnp programs can prepare you to specialize as a psychiatric-mental health nurse practitioner—a role that provides both opportunity and flexibility for passionate caregivers.

For those more business-minded, a health care administration degree online can open doors to management careers within hospitals, clinics, and healthcare organizations.

Each pathway has its own requirements and advantages, but all offer a way to impact healthcare while studying at your own pace and budget.

Best Scientists Citing Mark R. Haussler

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles