World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
85
Citations
27021
World Ranking
1330
National Ranking
39

M.P.J. van Boxtel publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where M.P.J. van Boxtel sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 313 publications — 84th percentile

84% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

M.P.J. van Boxtel D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where M.P.J. van Boxtel sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 85 D-Index — 86th percentile

86% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

M.P.J. van Boxtel is affiliated with Maastricht University in the Netherlands and has contributed extensively to the field of medicine, with a primary focus on dementia, cognitive impairment, and related health issues. Their body of work encompasses a broad range of topics within medicine, psychiatry, mental health, and neuroscience.

The main fields of study for van Boxtel include Medicine, with a substantial output of publications. The scientist's subfields of specialization feature:

  • Psychiatry and Mental Health
  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis

Van Boxtel has concentrated research efforts on several key topics including:

  • Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Disparities and Outcomes
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Nutritional Studies and Diet
  • Health, Environment, Cognitive Aging
  • Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications

The scientist has published research papers in various peer-reviewed journals. Frequent publication venues are:

  • Alzheimer's & Dementia
  • Journal of Alzheimer's Disease
  • Journal of Affective Disorders
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • GeroScience

Some of van Boxtel's recent papers include:

  • "Increase in blood-brain barrier leakage in healthy, older adults" (2020), published in GeroScience
  • "Estimating prevalence of subjective cognitive decline in and across international cohort studies of aging: a COSMIC study" (2020), published in Alzheimer's Research & Therapy
  • "Sex differences in dementia risk and risk factors: Individual-participant data analysis using 21 cohorts across six continents from the COSMIC consortium" (2023), published in Alzheimer's & Dementia
  • "Increasing knowledge on dementia risk reduction in the general population: Results of a public awareness campaign" (2021), published in Preventive Medicine
  • "Does parity matter in women's risk of dementia? A COSMIC collaboration cohort study" (2020), published in BMC Medicine

The scientist has collaborated frequently with several coauthors. These include:

  • Sebastian Köhler
  • Miranda T. Schram
  • Jacobus F.A. Jansen
  • Coen D.A. Stehouwer
  • Walter H. Backes

Best Publications

  • A conceptual framework for research on subjective cognitive decline in preclinical Alzheimer's disease

    Frank Jessen;Frank Jessen;Rebecca E. Amariglio;Martin van Boxtel;Monique Breteler

  • Effect of 3-year folic acid supplementation on cognitive function in older adults in the FACIT trial: a randomised, double blind, controlled trial.

    Jane Durga;Martin P J van Boxtel;Evert G Schouten;Frans J Kok

  • The Stroop Color-Word Test: Influence of Age, Sex, and Education; and Normative Data for a Large Sample Across the Adult Age Range

    Wim Van der Elst;Martin P. J. Van Boxtel;Gerard J. P. Van Breukelen;Jelle Jolles

  • Rey's verbal learning test: normative data for 1855 healthy participants aged 24-81 years and the influence of age, sex, education, and mode of presentation.

    Wim Van Der Elst;Martin P. J. Van Boxtel;Gerard J. P. Van Breukelen;Jelle Jolles

  • Dietary intake of fatty acids and fish in relation to cognitive performance at middle age.

    S. Kalmijn;M. P.J. van Boxtel;M. Ocké;W. M.M. Verschuren

  • Target risk factors for dementia prevention: a systematic review and Delphi consensus study on the evidence from observational studies

    Kay Deckers;Martin P. J. van Boxtel;Olga J. G. Schiepers;Marjolein de Vugt

  • Cognitive interventions in healthy older adults and people with mild cognitive impairment : a systematic review

    Jennifer Reijnders;Caroline van Heugten;Caroline van Heugten;Martin van Boxtel;Martin van Boxtel

  • Regional frontal cortical volumes decrease differentially in aging: an MRI study to compare volumetric approaches and voxel-based morphometry.

    Danielle J. Tisserand;Jens C. Pruessner;Ernesto J. Sanz Arigita;Martin P.J. van Boxtel

  • Cognitive functioning in healthy older adults aged 64-81: a cohort study into the effects of age, sex, and education.

    S.A.H. van Hooren;A.M. Valentijn;H. Bosma;R.W.H.M. Ponds

  • Change in Sensory Functioning Predicts Change in Cognitive Functioning: Results from a 6‐Year Follow‐Up in the Maastricht Aging Study

    Susanne A. M. Valentijn;Martin P. J. Van Boxtel;Susan A. H. Van Hooren;Hans Bosma

  • The Letter Digit Substitution Test: Normative Data for 1,858 Healthy Participants Aged 24–81 from the Maastricht Aging Study (MAAS): Influence of Age, Education, and Sex

    Wim van der Elst;Martin P.J. van Boxtel;Gerard J.P. van Breukelen;Jelle Jolles

  • Normative data for the Animal, Profession and Letter M Naming verbal fluency tests for Dutch speaking participants and the effects of age, education, and sex

    Wim Van Der Elst;Martin P.J. Van Boxtel;Gerard J.P. Van Breukelen;Jelle Jolles

  • Parietal cortex matters in Alzheimer's disease: an overview of structural, functional and metabolic findings.

    H.I.L. Jacobs;M.P.J. van Boxtel;J. Jolles;F. R. J. Verhey

  • n−3 Fatty acid proportions in plasma and cognitive performance in older adults

    Carla Dullemeijer;Jane Durga;Ingeborg A. Brouwer;Ondine Van De Rest

  • Inflammation markers in relation to cognition in a healthy aging population

    C.E Teunissen;M.P.J van Boxtel;H Bosma;E Bosmans

  • Flexible work schedules and mental and physical health. A study of a working population with non-traditional working hours

    M. F. J. Martens;F. J. N. Nijhuis;M. P. J. Van Boxtel;J. A. Knottnerus

  • The Relation Between Morbidity and Cognitive Performance in a Normal Aging Population

    Martin P. J. van Boxtel;Frank Buntinx;Peter J. Houx;Job F. M. Metsemakers

  • A systematic review of social support interventions for caregivers of people with dementia: Are they doing what they promise?

    Alieske E.H. Dam;Marjolein E. de Vugt;Inge P.M. Klinkenberg;Frans R.J. Verhey

  • Tryptophan depletion impairs memory consolidation but improves focussed attention in healthy young volunteers.

    J. A. J. Schmitt;B. L. Jorissen;S. Sobczak;M. P. J. Van Boxtel

  • Coronary heart disease and risk for cognitive impairment or dementia: Systematic review and meta-analysis

    Kay Deckers;Syenna H. J. Schievink;Maria M. F. Rodriquez;Robert J. van Oostenbrugge

  • The Concept Shifting Test: adult normative data.

    Wim Van der Elst;Martin P. J. Van Boxtel;Gerard J. P. Van Breukelen;Jelle Jolles

  • Efficacy and usability of assistive technology for patients with cognitive deficits: a systematic review

    Elsbeth de Joode;Caroline van Heugten;Frans Verhey;Martin van Boxtel

  • Mental Work Demands Protect Against Cognitive Impairment: MAAS Prospective Cohort Study

    Hans Bosma;Martin P. J. van Boxtel;Rudolf W. H. M. Ponds;Peter J. Houx

  • Subjective sleep problems in later life as predictors of cognitive decline. Report from the Maastricht Ageing Study (MAAS)

    Marko Jelicic;Hans Bosma;Rudolf W. H. M. Ponds;Martin P. J. Van Boxtel

Frequent Co-Authors

Jelle Jolles
Jelle Jolles Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Frans R.J. Verhey
Frans R.J. Verhey Maastricht University
Hans Bosma
Hans Bosma Maastricht University
Harry B.M. Uylings
Harry B.M. Uylings Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Wim J. Riedel
Wim J. Riedel Maastricht University
Heidi I.L. Jacobs
Heidi I.L. Jacobs Harvard University
Rudolf W. H. M. Ponds
Rudolf W. H. M. Ponds Maastricht University
Paul A.M. Hofman
Paul A.M. Hofman Maastricht University
Coen D.A. Stehouwer
Coen D.A. Stehouwer Maastricht University
Walter H. Backes
Walter H. Backes Maastricht University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing M.P.J. van Boxtel

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles