World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
66
Citations
14409
World Ranking
3026
National Ranking
98

Paul A.M. Hofman publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul A.M. Hofman sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 178 publications — 55th percentile

55% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Paul A.M. Hofman D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul A.M. Hofman sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 66 D-Index — 69th percentile

69% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Paul A.M. Hofman is affiliated with Maastricht University in the Netherlands. Their primary field of research is Medicine, with a specialization in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Psychiatry and Mental Health, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, General Health Professions, and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience.

Their research topics span various areas including Autopsy Techniques and Outcomes, Epilepsy Research and Treatment, Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications, Healthcare Cost, Quality, and Practices, Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research, Fetal and Pediatric Neurological Disorders, and Functional Brain Connectivity Studies.

Recent research output includes the following papers:

  • Neuroimaging of Anxiety in Parkinson's Disease: A Systematic Review, 2020, Movement Disorders
  • Ultra-high field magnetic resonance imaging in human epilepsy: A systematic review, 2021, NeuroImage Clinical
  • Predictive value of functional MRI and EEG in epilepsy diagnosis after a first seizure, 2020, Epilepsy & Behavior
  • Volumetric and Functional Activity Lateralization in Healthy Subjects and Patients with Focal Epilepsy: Initial Findings in a 7T MRI Study, 2020, Journal of Neuroimaging
  • Value of ultra-high field MRI in patients with suspected focal epilepsy and negative 3 T MRI (EpiUltraStudy): protocol for a prospective, longitudinal therapeutic study, 2022, Neuroradiology

Frequent collaborations have been established with several co-authors, including:

  • Jamie Elifritz
  • Chris O'Donnell
  • Thomas D. Ruder
  • Olaf Schijns
  • Walter H. Backes

Their research has been published frequently in venues such as:

  • Forensic Imaging
  • Epilepsy & Behavior
  • Neuroradiology
  • Journal of Clinical Pathology
  • Topics in Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Best Publications

  • Migraine as a Risk Factor for Subclinical Brain Lesions

    Mark C. Kruit;Mark A. van Buchem;Paul A. M. Hofman;Jacobus T. N. Bakkers

  • Cerebral hyperperfusion syndrome.

    Walther N K A van Mook;Roger J M W Rennenberg;Geert Willem Schurink;Robert Jan van Oostenbrugge

  • Blood-Brain Barrier Leakage in Patients with Early Alzheimer Disease

    Harm J. van de Haar;Saartje Burgmans;Jacobus F. A. Jansen;Matthias J. P. van Osch

  • Medial temporal lobe atrophy predicts Alzheimer's disease in patients with minor cognitive impairment

    P J Visser;F R J Verhey;P A M Hofman;P Scheltens

  • Detection of lymph node metastases in head and neck cancer: a meta-analysis comparing US, USgFNAC, CT, and MR imaging

    R.B.J. de Bondt;P.J. Nelemans;P.A.M. Hofman;J.W. Casselman

  • Increased Aortic Pulse Wave Velocity Is Associated With Silent Cerebral Small-Vessel Disease in Hypertensive Patients

    Léon H.G. Henskens;Abraham A. Kroon;Robert J. van Oostenbrugge;Ed H.B.M. Gronenschild

  • A Voxel-based Morphometric Study to Determine Individual Differences in Gray Matter Density Associated with Age and Cognitive Change Over Time

    Danielle J. Tisserand;Martin P.J. van Boxtel;Jens C. Pruessner;Paul Hofman

  • MR imaging, Single-photon emission CT and Neurocognitive performance after mild traumatic brain injury.

    P.A.M. Hofman;S.Z. Stapert;M.J.P.G. van Kroonenburgh;J. Jolles

  • Structural Brain Changes in Migraine

    Inge H. Palm-Meinders;Hille Koppen;Gisela M. Terwindt;Lenore J. Launer

  • Functional connectivity of dissociation in patients with psychogenic non-epileptic seizures

    Sylvie J M van der Kruijs;Nynke M G Bodde;Maarten J Vaessen;Richard H C Lazeron

  • Working memory deficits in high-functioning adolescents with autism spectrum disorders: neuropsychological and neuroimaging correlates

    Evelien M. Barendse;Evelien M. Barendse;Marc P. H. Hendriks;Jacobus F. A. Jansen;Jacobus F. A. Jansen;Walter H. Backes;Walter H. Backes

  • Blood-brain barrier leakage is more widespread in patients with cerebral small vessel disease

    C. Eleana Zhang;Sau May Wong;Harm J. van de Haar;Julie Staals

  • Operational Definitions for the NINDS-AIREN Criteria for Vascular Dementia. An Interobserver Study

    Elisabeth C.W. Van Straaten;Philip Scheltens;Dirk L. Knol;Mark A. Van Buchem

  • Neurovascular unit impairment in early Alzheimer's disease measured with magnetic resonance imaging

    Harm J. van de Haar;Jacobus F.A. Jansen;Matthias J.P. van Osch;Mark A. van Buchem

  • Cognitive dysfunctions and white matter lesions in patients with bipolar disorder in remission.

    L. Krabbendam;A. Honig;J. Wiersma;E. F. P. M. Vuurman

  • The role of dual energy CT in differentiating between brain haemorrhage and contrast medium after mechanical revascularisation in acute ischaemic stroke.

    M. P. M. Tijssen;P. A. M. Hofman;P. A. M. Hofman;A. A. R. Stadler;W. van Zwam

  • Loss of network efficiency associated with cognitive decline in chronic epilepsy

    M. C. G. Vlooswijk;M. J. Vaessen;J. F. A. Jansen;M. C. F. T. M. de Krom

  • Thalamic volume predicts performance on tests of cognitive speed and decreases in healthy aging. A magnetic resonance imaging-based volumetric analysis.

    Ysbrand D Van Der Werf;Danielle J Tisserand;Pieter Jelle Visser;Paul A.M Hofman

  • Cerebral blood flow, blood supply, and cognition in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

    Jacobus F. A. Jansen;Frank C. G. van Bussel;Harm J. van de Haar;Matthias J. P. van Osch

  • White Matter Network Abnormalities Are Associated with Cognitive Decline in Chronic Epilepsy

    Maarten J. Vaessen;Maarten J. Vaessen;Jacobus F. A. Jansen;Jacobus F. A. Jansen;Marielle C. G. Vlooswijk;Marielle C. G. Vlooswijk;Paul A. M. Hofman;Paul A. M. Hofman

  • Blood-Brain Barrier Leakage in Patients with Early Alzheimer Disease (vol 281, pg 527, 2016)

    Harm J van de Haar;Saartje Burgmans;Jacobus F A Jansen;Matthias J P van Osch

Frequent Co-Authors

Walter H. Backes
Walter H. Backes Maastricht University
Jacobus F.A. Jansen
Jacobus F.A. Jansen Maastricht University
Albert P. Aldenkamp
Albert P. Aldenkamp Eindhoven University of Technology
Jelle Jolles
Jelle Jolles Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Robert J. van Oostenbrugge
Robert J. van Oostenbrugge Maastricht University
Paul Boon
Paul Boon Ghent University
Frans R.J. Verhey
Frans R.J. Verhey Maastricht University
Johan S.H. Vles
Johan S.H. Vles Maastricht University
Kristl Vonck
Kristl Vonck Ghent University
Martin P.J. van Boxtel
Martin P.J. van Boxtel Maastricht University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Paul A.M. Hofman

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles