World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Jacobus F.A. Jansen

Jacobus F.A. Jansen

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
58
Citations
11061
World Ranking
4195
National Ranking
131

Jacobus F.A. Jansen publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jacobus F.A. Jansen sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 245 publications — 73rd percentile

73% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Jacobus F.A. Jansen D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jacobus F.A. Jansen sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 58 D-Index — 57th percentile

57% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jacobus F.A. Jansen is affiliated with Maastricht University in the Netherlands. Their research primarily focuses on various aspects of medicine and neuroscience, with particular emphasis on advanced imaging techniques and brain-related studies.

The scientist's recent publications include work on neurological and cognitive topics, often employing advanced MRI methodologies. Notable papers include:

  • "Me, myself, bye: regional alterations in glutamate and the experience of ego dissolution with psilocybin," 2020, published in Neuropsychopharmacology
  • "Increase in blood-brain barrier leakage in healthy, older adults," 2020, published in GeroScience
  • "7T Epilepsy Task Force Consensus Recommendations on the Use of 7T MRI in Clinical Practice," 2020, published in Neurology
  • "Quality control strategies for brain MRI segmentation and parcellation: Practical approaches and recommendations - insights from the Maastricht study," 2021, published in NeuroImage
  • "Imaging the role of blood-brain barrier disruption in normal cognitive ageing," 2020, published in GeroScience

Their frequent co-authors include Walter H. Backes, Gerhard S. Drenthen, Miranda T. Schram, Coen D.A. Stehouwer, and Paulien Voorter.

Jacobus F.A. Jansen has contributed multiple papers to a variety of publication venues, with a strong presence in:

  • Proceedings on CD-ROM - International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. Scientific Meeting and Exhibition/Proceedings of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Scientific Meeting and Exhibition
  • Alzheimer's & Dementia
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • GeroScience
  • Journal of Neuroimaging

Their work spans main fields of study including Medicine and Neuroscience, with key subfields such as:

  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Neurology
  • Psychiatry and Mental Health
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience

Jacobus F.A. Jansen focuses on several main research topics, among which are:

  • Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
  • Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • MRI in Cancer Diagnosis
  • Cerebrospinal Fluid and Hydrocephalus
  • Cerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases
  • Epilepsy Research and Treatment

Best Publications

  • Blood-Brain Barrier Leakage in Patients with Early Alzheimer Disease

    Harm J. van de Haar;Saartje Burgmans;Jacobus F. A. Jansen;Matthias J. P. van Osch

  • 1H MR Spectroscopy of the Brain: Absolute Quantification of Metabolites

    Jacobus F. A. Jansen;Walter H. Backes;Klaas Nicolay;M. Eline Kooi

  • Functional connectivity of dissociation in patients with psychogenic non-epileptic seizures

    Sylvie J M van der Kruijs;Nynke M G Bodde;Maarten J Vaessen;Richard H C Lazeron

  • Working memory deficits in high-functioning adolescents with autism spectrum disorders: neuropsychological and neuroimaging correlates

    Evelien M. Barendse;Evelien M. Barendse;Marc P. H. Hendriks;Jacobus F. A. Jansen;Jacobus F. A. Jansen;Walter H. Backes;Walter H. Backes

  • Me, myself, bye: regional alterations in glutamate and the experience of ego dissolution with psilocybin

    N. L. Mason;K. P. C. Kuypers;F. Müller;F. Müller;J. Reckweg

  • Blood-brain barrier leakage is more widespread in patients with cerebral small vessel disease

    C. Eleana Zhang;Sau May Wong;Harm J. van de Haar;Julie Staals

  • Neurovascular unit impairment in early Alzheimer's disease measured with magnetic resonance imaging

    Harm J. van de Haar;Jacobus F.A. Jansen;Matthias J.P. van Osch;Mark A. van Buchem

  • Big GABA: Edited MR spectroscopy at 24 research sites

    Mark Mikkelsen;Mark Mikkelsen;Peter B. Barker;Peter B. Barker;Pallab K. Bhattacharyya;Pallab K. Bhattacharyya;Maiken K. Brix

  • Increase in blood–brain barrier leakage in healthy, older adults

    Inge C M Verheggen;Joost J A de Jong;Martin P J van Boxtel;Ed H B M Gronenschild

  • Blood-brain barrier impairment and hypoperfusion are linked in cerebral small vessel disease

    Sau May Wong;Jacobus F.A. Jansen;C. Eleana Zhang;Erik I. Hoff

  • Loss of network efficiency associated with cognitive decline in chronic epilepsy

    M. C. G. Vlooswijk;M. J. Vaessen;J. F. A. Jansen;M. C. F. T. M. de Krom

  • Cerebral blood flow, blood supply, and cognition in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

    Jacobus F. A. Jansen;Frank C. G. van Bussel;Harm J. van de Haar;Matthias J. P. van Osch

  • Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging as a predictor of outcome in head-and-neck squamous cell carcinoma patients with nodal metastases.

    Amita Shukla-Dave;Nancy Y. Lee;Jacobus F A Jansen;Howard T. Thaler

  • White Matter Network Abnormalities Are Associated with Cognitive Decline in Chronic Epilepsy

    Maarten J. Vaessen;Maarten J. Vaessen;Jacobus F. A. Jansen;Jacobus F. A. Jansen;Marielle C. G. Vlooswijk;Marielle C. G. Vlooswijk;Paul A. M. Hofman;Paul A. M. Hofman

  • Interaction between blood-brain barrier and glymphatic system in solute clearance.

    I.C.M. Verheggen;M.P.J. Van Boxtel;F.R.J. Verhey;J.F.A. Jansen

  • Resting-state networks and dissociation in psychogenic non-epileptic seizures

    Sylvie J.M. van der Kruijs;Sridhar R. Jagannathan;Nynke M.G. Bodde;René M.H. Besseling;René M.H. Besseling

  • The effect and reproducibility of different clinical DTI gradient sets on small world brain connectivity measures.

    M. J. Vaessen;P. A. M. Hofman;H. N. Tijssen;H. N. Tijssen;Albert P. Aldenkamp

  • Noninvasive Assessment of Tumor Microenvironment Using Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging and 18F-Fluoromisonidazole Positron Emission Tomography Imaging in Neck Nodal Metastases

    Jacobus F.A. Jansen;Heiko Schöder;Nancy Y. Lee;Ya Wang

  • Non-gaussian analysis of diffusion-weighted MR imaging in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: A feasibility study.

    J. F. A. Jansen;Hilda. E. Stambuk;Jason A. Koutcher;A. Shukla-Dave

  • Blood-brain barrier leakage in relation to white matter hyperintensity volume and cognition in small vessel disease and normal aging.

    C. Eleana Zhang;Sau May Wong;Renske Uiterwijk;Walter H. Backes

  • Tumor Metabolism and Perfusion in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Pretreatment Multimodality Imaging With 1H Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy, Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI, and [18F]FDG-PET

    Jacobus F.A. Jansen;Heiko Schöder;Nancy Y. Lee;Hilda. E. Stambuk

  • Blood-Brain Barrier Leakage in Patients with Early Alzheimer Disease (vol 281, pg 527, 2016)

    Harm J van de Haar;Saartje Burgmans;Jacobus F A Jansen;Matthias J P van Osch

Frequent Co-Authors

Walter H. Backes
Walter H. Backes Maastricht University
Albert P. Aldenkamp
Albert P. Aldenkamp Eindhoven University of Technology
Paul A.M. Hofman
Paul A.M. Hofman Maastricht University
Frans R.J. Verhey
Frans R.J. Verhey Maastricht University
Coen D.A. Stehouwer
Coen D.A. Stehouwer Maastricht University
Robert J. van Oostenbrugge
Robert J. van Oostenbrugge Maastricht University
Martin P.J. van Boxtel
Martin P.J. van Boxtel Maastricht University
Nicolaas A.J. Puts
Nicolaas A.J. Puts King's College London
Richard Anthony Edward Edden
Richard Anthony Edward Edden Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Heidi I.L. Jacobs
Heidi I.L. Jacobs Harvard University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Students interested in neuroscience often explore adjacent fields that complement or expand their career prospects. Psychology is a natural choice, and today it’s easier than ever to study with online degree psychology programs, which offer flexibility with affordability.

Another popular route is social work, especially for those passionate about mental health and direct client support. If this sounds appealing, consider msw online degree programs—many offer accessible pathways for those new to the field.

For those seeking a doctorate with clinical focus, online accredited psyd programs can prepare graduates for roles in psychological assessment, therapy, and applied research.

If you’re interested in therapy and counseling, particularly with families and couples, you might consider accredited marriage and family therapy online programs accredited. These programs can lead to licensure and a rewarding career supporting diverse communities.

Best Scientists Citing Jacobus F.A. Jansen

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles