World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 53 4808 4454 233 223 141 11127

Wim J. Riedel publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Wim J. Riedel between 1986 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Wim J. Riedel published across 40 years, from 1986 to 2025, averaging 3.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 17 publications in 2002. 4 of the 156 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1986 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 17. Peak 17 publications in 2002. 1986: 1 publication 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 1 publication 1994: 1 publication 1995: 7 publications 1996: 5 publications 1997: 4 publications 1998: 6 publications 1999: 8 publications 2000: 6 publications 2001: 7 publications 2002: 17 publications 2003: 9 publications 2004: 5 publications 2005: 7 publications 2006: 7 publications 2007: 6 publications 2008: 6 publications 2009: 8 publications 2010: 6 publications 2011: 8 publications 2012: 4 publications 2013: 3 publications 2014: 7 publications 2015: 2 publications 2016: 1 publication 2017: 1 publication 2018: 1 publication 2019: 1 publication 2020: 1 publication 2021: 2 publications 2022: 2 publications 2023: 2 publications 2024: 3 publications 2025: 1 publication
1986 2025

156 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Wim J. Riedel: publications per year, 1986 to 2025
Year Publications
1986 1
1987 0
1988 0
1989 0
1990 0
1991 0
1992 0
1993 1
1994 1
1995 7
1996 5
1997 4
1998 6
1999 8
2000 6
2001 7
2002 17
2003 9
2004 5
2005 7
2006 7
2007 6
2008 6
2009 8
2010 6
2011 8
2012 4
2013 3
2014 7
2015 2
2016 1
2017 1
2018 1
2019 1
2020 1
2021 2
2022 2
2023 2
2024 3
2025 1
Total 156
Download as CSV

Wim J. Riedel publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Wim J. Riedel sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 141–150 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 141 publications — 44th percentile

44% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597 141
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Wim J. Riedel D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Wim J. Riedel sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 52–53 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 53 D-Index — 59th percentile

59% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390 53
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Wim J. Riedel is affiliated with Maastricht University in the Netherlands and focuses extensively on research related to psychology, particularly in experimental and cognitive psychology. Their scholarship also extends into occupational therapy, social psychology, cellular and molecular neuroscience, and genetics.

The primary topics of Wim J. Riedel's research include sleep and work-related fatigue, occupational health and performance, sleep and related disorders, ergonomics and musculoskeletal disorders, high altitude and hypoxia, coffee research and impacts, and pharmacological effects and assays.

Frequent co-authors in their work include Yara Q. Wingelaar-Jagt, Johannes G. Ramaekers, Thijs T. Wingelaar, Charelle Bottenheft, and Lotte de Vrijer.

Wim J. Riedel's recent papers reflect a strong focus on the effects of fatigue and pharmacological interventions in occupational settings, especially involving aviation personnel. Notable recent publications include:

  • Fatigue in Aviation: Safety Risks, Preventive Strategies and Pharmacological Interventions, 2021, Frontiers in Physiology
  • Effects of modafinil and caffeine on night-time vigilance of air force crewmembers: A randomized controlled trial, 2022, Journal of Psychopharmacology
  • Comparison of effects of modafinil and caffeine on fatigue-vulnerable and fatigue-resistant aircrew after a limited period of sleep deprivation, 2024, Frontiers in Physiology
  • Subjective Effects of Modafinil in Military Fighter Pilots During Deployment, 2022, Aerospace Medicine and Human Performance
  • Daily Caffeine Intake and the Effect of Caffeine on Pilots' Performance After Extended Wakefulness, 2023, Aerospace Medicine and Human Performance

The main publication venues for their work are Aerospace Medicine and Human Performance, Frontiers in Physiology, Journal of Psychopharmacology, Neuroscience Applied, and Neuron.

Best Publications

  • Cognitive impairment in depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis

    P. L. Rock;J. P. Roiser;W. J. Riedel;A. D. Blackwell

  • The nature of the effect of female gonadal hormone replacement therapy on cognitive function in post-menopausal women: a meta-analysis

    E. Hogervorst;J. Williams;M. Budge;W. Riedel

  • Serotonergic vulnerability and depression: assumptions, experimental evidence and implications.

    L A W Jans;W J Riedel;C R Markus;A Blokland

  • Cognitive performance after strenuous physical exercise.

    Eef Hogervorst;Wim Riedel;Asker Jeukendrup;Jelle Jolles

  • Tryptophan depletion in normal volunteers produces selective impairment in memory consolidation.

    W.J. Riedel;T. Klaassen;N.E.P. Deutz;A. van Someren

  • Serotonin and human cognitive performance.

    J. A.J. Schmitt;M. Wingen;J. G. Ramaekers;E. A.T. Evers

  • Tryptophan depletion impairs memory consolidation but improves focussed attention in healthy young volunteers.

    J. A. J. Schmitt;B. L. Jorissen;S. Sobczak;M. P. J. Van Boxtel

  • Monoamine depletion in psychiatric and healthy populations: review

    L Booij;A J W Van der Does;W J Riedel;W J Riedel;W J Riedel

  • Increased EEG gamma band activity in Alzheimer's disease and mild cognitive impairment

    J. A. van Deursen;E. F. P. M. Vuurman;F. R. J. Verhey;V. H. J. M. van Kranen-Mastenbroek

  • Effects of acute tryptophan depletion on memory, attention and executive functions: a systematic review.

    Daniel Mendelsohn;Wim J. Riedel;Anke Sambeth

  • Caffeine attenuates scopolamine-induced memory impairment in humans

    W Riedel;E Hogervorst;R Leboux;F Verhey

  • Cognitive effects of methylphenidate in healthy volunteers: a review of single dose studies

    A. M. W. Linssen;A. Sambeth;E. F. P. M. Vuurman;W. J. Riedel

  • Habitual caffeine consumption and its relation to memory, attention, planning capacity and psychomotor performance across multiple age groups

    P.A.H.M. Hameleers;M.P.J. van Boxtel;E. Hogervorst;W.J. Riedel

  • Specificity of the tryptophan depletion method.

    T. Klaassen;W.J. Riedel;N.E.P. Deutz;A. van Someren

  • Mood effects of 24-hour tryptophan depletion in healthy first-degree relatives of patients with affective disorders.

    T. Klaassen;W.J. Riedel;A. van Someren;N.E.P. Deutz

  • Non-serotonergic pharmacological profiles and associated cognitive effects of serotonin reuptake inhibitors.

    Jeroen A. J. Schmitt;Monique J. Kruizinga;Wim J. Riedel

  • Drug targets for cognitive enhancement in neuropsychiatric disorders

    Tanya L. Wallace;Theresa M. Ballard;Bruno Pouzet;Wim J. Riedel

  • Lithium induced cognitive side-effects in bipolar disorder: a qualitative analysis and implications for daily practice.

    A. Honig;B. M. G. Arts;R. W. H. M. Ponds;W. J. Riedel

  • Tryptophan, mood, and cognitive function.

    Wim J Riedel;Tineke Klaassen;Jeroen A J Schmitt

  • Acute tryptophan depletion affects brain-gut responses in irritable bowel syndrome patients and controls

    T O C Kilkens;A Honig;M A van Nieuwenhoven;W J Riedel

  • Differential residual effects of zaleplon and zopiclone on actual driving: a comparison with a low dose of alcohol.

    Annemiek Vermeeren;Wim J Riedel;Martin P J van Boxtel;Mona Darwish

Frequent Co-Authors

Jelle Jolles
Jelle Jolles Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Johannes G. Ramaekers
Johannes G. Ramaekers Maastricht University
Arjan Blokland
Arjan Blokland Maastricht University
Frans R.J. Verhey
Frans R.J. Verhey Maastricht University
M.P.J. van Boxtel
M.P.J. van Boxtel Maastricht University
Nicolaas E. P. Deutz
Nicolaas E. P. Deutz Texas A&M University
Lydia Krabbendam
Lydia Krabbendam Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Jim van Os
Jim van Os University Medical Center Utrecht
Mitul A. Mehta
Mitul A. Mehta King's College London
Eugenii A. Rabiner
Eugenii A. Rabiner King's College London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in psychology opens doors to a variety of rewarding career paths, especially in the field of counseling. Many students in the USA are choosing online psychology and counseling degrees, which offer flexibility and make it easier to balance studies with work and other commitments.

Those interested in becoming Licensed Professional Counselors (LPC) should be aware that licensure requirements vary by state. For example, the Delaware licensed professional counselor requirements stipulate specific accredited coursework, post-graduate supervised experience, and exams. Similarly, the lpc licensure requirements in Florida include passing the National Clinical Mental Health Counseling Examination and meeting strict education and supervision criteria.

In Georgia, aspiring counselors must meet the Georgia licensed professional counselor requirements, which involve a combination of education, experience, and exams. Likewise, candidates should review the Hawaii licensed professional counselor requirements for details on degree standards and supervised hours.

When considering online psychology programs, it’s important to select accredited options that meet your state’s licensure criteria. This ensures a smooth transition from earning your degree to building a successful counseling career.

Best Scientists Citing Wim J. Riedel

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles