World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
49
Citations
16181
World Ranking
5556
National Ranking
3034

David Klahr publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David Klahr sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 132 publications — 39th percentile

39% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

David Klahr D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David Klahr sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 49 D-Index — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2008 - Fellow of the American Educational Research Association
  • 2001 - Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA)

Overview

David Klahr is affiliated with Carnegie Mellon University in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on the fields of Arts and Humanities, with specific attention to Visual Arts and Performing Arts, History, and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

The scientist's work centers on topics related to Visual Culture and Art Theory, Photography and Visual Culture, and Advanced Vision and Imaging.

Recent publications by David Klahr include:

  • "Palace versus City: Wilhelm II's Terrace Project, 1892-1901," published in 2021 in German History
  • "Shifting scenes of colouration and illumination: the narrative and temporal fluidities of tissue paper stereoviews," published in 2022 in Early Popular Visual Culture

The publication venues where they have contributed include:

  • German History
  • Early Popular Visual Culture

David Klahr has not listed frequent co-authors in the given data.

The scientist was recognized with the following awards:

  • Fellow of the American Educational Research Association, 2008
  • Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA), 2001

Best Publications

  • Dual space search during scientific reasoning

    David Klahr;Kevin Dunbar

  • The Equivalence of Learning Paths in Early Science Instruction Effects of Direct Instruction and Discovery Learning

    David Klahr;Milena Nigam

  • All Other Things Being Equal: Acquisition and Transfer of the Control of Variables Strategy

    Zhe Chen;David Klahr

  • Exploring Science: The Cognition and Development of Discovery Processes

    David Klahr

  • Cognitive development: An information-processing view

    David Klahr;John Gilbert Wallace

  • Formal assessment of problem-solving and planning processes in preschool children☆

    David Klahr;Mitchell Robinson

  • Heuristics for scientific experimentation: a developmental study.

    David Klahr;Anne L. Fay;Kevin Dunbar

  • Hands on What? The Relative Effectiveness of Physical versus Virtual Materials in an Engineering Design Project by Middle School Children

    David Klahr;Lara M. Triona;Cameron Williams

  • Studies of Scientific Discovery: Complementary Approaches and Convergent Findings

    David Klahr;Herbert A. Simon

  • Children's Scientific Curiosity: In Search of an Operational Definition of an Elusive Concept.

    Jamie Jirout;David Klahr

  • Production System Models of Learning and Development

    David Klahr;Pat Langley;Robert Neches

  • Span and rate of apprehension in children and adults.

    Michelene T.H Chi;David Klahr

  • Guided Play Principles and Practices

    Deena Skolnick Weisberg;Kathy Hirsh-Pasek;Kathy Hirsh-Pasek;Roberta Michnick Golinkoff;Audrey K. Kittredge

  • Cognitive objectives in a LOGO debugging curriculum: Instruction, learning, and transfer ☆

    David Klahr;Sharon McCoy Carver

  • Point and Click or Grab and Heft: Comparing the Influence of Physical and Virtual Instructional Materials on Elementary School Students' Ability to Design Experiments

    Lara M. Triona;David Klahr

  • Scientific Thinking and Reasoning

    Kevin N. Dunbar;David Klahr

  • Cognition and Instruction : Twenty-five Years of Progress

    Sharon M. Carver;David Klahr

  • A monte carlo investigation of the statistical significance of Kruskal's nonmetric scaling procedure

    David Klahr

  • Developmental Differences in Scientific Discovery Processes

    Kevin Dunbar;David Klahr

  • Complex Information Processing: The Impact of Herbert A. Simon

    David Klahr;K. Kotovsky

Frequent Co-Authors

Kevin Dunbar
Kevin Dunbar University of Maryland, College Park
Christian D. Schunn
Christian D. Schunn University of Pittsburgh
Kathy Hirsh-Pasek
Kathy Hirsh-Pasek Temple University
Kenneth R. Koedinger
Kenneth R. Koedinger Carnegie Mellon University
Roberta Michnick Golinkoff
Roberta Michnick Golinkoff University of Delaware
Allen Newell
Allen Newell Carnegie Mellon University
Gaea Leinhardt
Gaea Leinhardt University of Pittsburgh
Herbert A. Simon
Herbert A. Simon Carnegie Mellon University
James G. Greeno
James G. Greeno University of Pittsburgh
Pat Langley
Pat Langley Stanford University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Many students interested in psychology also explore online degrees in related fields such as social work, counseling, or human services. These career pathways are growing in demand and often require navigating specific educational requirements based on state regulations.

For example, licensure and employment in social work differ across the United States. If you plan to practice in Arizona, you should note the Arizona minimum degree requirement for social workers. Similarly, those considering work in Arkansas should be familiar with the Arkansas education requirements for social workers.

The requirements are unique in California as well, where the California education requirements for social workers highlight the need for graduate-level credentials for higher-level roles. In Colorado, aspiring professionals can explore specific expectations by reviewing the Colorado education requirements for social workers.

Exploring these online degree programs and understanding your state’s criteria will help you make informed choices about your psychology or social work career path.

Best Scientists Citing David Klahr

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles