World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 77 1617 1449 962 842 188 35342

Deanna Kuhn publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Deanna Kuhn between 1967 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Deanna Kuhn published across 59 years, from 1967 to 2025, averaging 3.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 16 publications in 2017. 10 of the 223 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1967 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 16. Peak 16 publications in 2017. 1967: 1 publication 1968: 0 publications 1969: 1 publication 1970: 0 publications 1971: 1 publication 1972: 1 publication 1973: 1 publication 1974: 2 publications 1975: 1 publication 1976: 6 publications 1977: 4 publications 1978: 2 publications 1979: 8 publications 1980: 2 publications 1981: 1 publication 1982: 5 publications 1983: 2 publications 1984: 1 publication 1985: 1 publication 1986: 1 publication 1987: 0 publications 1988: 1 publication 1989: 1 publication 1990: 2 publications 1991: 13 publications 1992: 1 publication 1993: 4 publications 1994: 3 publications 1995: 8 publications 1996: 3 publications 1997: 3 publications 1998: 2 publications 1999: 1 publication 2000: 6 publications 2001: 4 publications 2002: 5 publications 2003: 4 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 5 publications 2006: 3 publications 2007: 9 publications 2008: 6 publications 2009: 8 publications 2010: 4 publications 2011: 6 publications 2012: 1 publication 2013: 2 publications 2014: 1 publication 2015: 7 publications 2016: 9 publications 2017: 16 publications 2018: 5 publications 2019: 5 publications 2020: 5 publications 2021: 6 publications 2022: 4 publications 2023: 5 publications 2024: 5 publications 2025: 5 publications
1967 2025

223 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Deanna Kuhn: publications per year, 1967 to 2025
Year Publications
1967 1
1968 0
1969 1
1970 0
1971 1
1972 1
1973 1
1974 2
1975 1
1976 6
1977 4
1978 2
1979 8
1980 2
1981 1
1982 5
1983 2
1984 1
1985 1
1986 1
1987 0
1988 1
1989 1
1990 2
1991 13
1992 1
1993 4
1994 3
1995 8
1996 3
1997 3
1998 2
1999 1
2000 6
2001 4
2002 5
2003 4
2004 4
2005 5
2006 3
2007 9
2008 6
2009 8
2010 4
2011 6
2012 1
2013 2
2014 1
2015 7
2016 9
2017 16
2018 5
2019 5
2020 5
2021 6
2022 4
2023 5
2024 5
2025 5
Total 223
Download as CSV

Deanna Kuhn publications per year - data summary

  • Deanna Kuhn, a Psychology scholar from Columbia University, has 223 publications recorded across 59 years, from 1967 to 2025.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1967 and the most recent to 2025.
  • The most productive year is 2017, with 16 publications.
  • The least productive years with any output are 1967, 1969, 1971, 1972 and others, with 1 publication each.
  • 3 of the 59 years in the span carry no publications at all (1968, 1970 and 1987).
  • The rate of publication averages 3.8 papers per year over the whole span, or 4.0 per year counting only the 56 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2021-2025) hold 25 publications, 11% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1967-1986: 41 publications (2.0 per year); 1987-2006: 73 publications (3.6 per year); 2007-2025: 109 publications (5.7 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Deanna Kuhn publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Deanna Kuhn sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 181–190 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 188 publications — 65th percentile

65% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397 188
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Deanna Kuhn publication distribution in Psychology in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 11,416 Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 69 ranges running from 31–40 to 705+ publications.
  • Deanna Kuhn, a Psychology scholar from Columbia University, records 188 publications - the 65th percentile of the discipline.
  • 65% of ranked Psychology scientists score the same or lower than Deanna Kuhn, and about 35% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 151–160 publications range, and Deanna Kuhn ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 101–110 publications, holding 736 scientists (6% of the field).
  • 72% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 201–210 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 705 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Deanna Kuhn D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Deanna Kuhn sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 76–77 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 77 D-Index — 86th percentile

86% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132 77
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Deanna Kuhn D-index placement in Psychology in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 11,416 Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 58 ranges running from 30–31 to 144+ D-Index.
  • Deanna Kuhn, a Psychology scholar from Columbia University, records 77 D-Index - the 86th percentile of the discipline.
  • 86% of ranked Psychology scientists score the same or lower than Deanna Kuhn, and about 14% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 48–49 D-Index range, and Deanna Kuhn ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 32–33 D-Index, holding 702 scientists (6% of the field).
  • 68% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 58–59 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more, 98 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Overview

Deanna Kuhn is affiliated with Columbia University in the United States and conducts research primarily in the fields of psychology and social sciences. Their scholarly focus encompasses developmental and educational psychology, with significant attention to education and critical thinking development. Kuhn's work particularly addresses educational strategies and epistemologies as well as innovative teaching and learning methods.

The scientist's research interests extend beyond psychology into astronomy and astrophysics, contributing to topics such as gamma-ray bursts, supernovae, and broader astronomy and astrophysical research. Additional subjects of their publications include science education and pedagogy, and educator training with historical pedagogy.

Kuhn has published multiple papers in notable academic venues. Recent publications include:

  • "Metacognition matters in many ways," 2021, Educational Psychologist
  • "Yes but: developing a critical stance toward evidence," 2021, International Journal of Science Education
  • "Choose Your Evidence," 2021, Science & Education
  • "Talking about group (but not individual) process aids group performance," 2020, International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning

Frequent coauthors in Kuhn's body of work include Anahid Modrek, M Ginolin, M. Smith, F. Ruppin, and C Barjou-Delayre, each contributing to multiple collaborations.

The venues where Kuhn's research has regularly appeared are diverse, highlighting interdisciplinary approaches. These include arXiv (Cornell University), Science & Education, Astronomy and Astrophysics, International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, and Educational Psychologist.

Best Publications

  • The skills of argument

    Deanna Kuhn

  • The development of scientific thinking skills

    Deanna Kuhn;Eric Amsel;Michael O'Loughlin;Leona Schauble

  • A Developmental Model of Critical Thinking

    Deanna Kuhn

  • Science as argument : Implications for teaching and learning scientific thinking

    Deanna Kuhn

  • Children and adults as intuitive scientists.

    Deanna Kuhn

  • The development of epistemological understanding

    Deanna Kuhn;Richard Cheney;Michael Weinstock

  • Education for Thinking

    Deanna Kuhn

  • Metacognition: A Bridge Between Cognitive Psychology and Educational Practice

    Deanna Kuhn;David Dean

  • The development of argument skills.

    Deanna Kuhn;Wadiya Udell

  • Thinking as Argument

    Deanna Kuhn

  • Effects of Dyadic Interaction on Argumentive Reasoning

    Deanna Kuhn;Victoria Shaw;Mark Felton

  • Strategies of Knowledge Acquisition

    Deanna Kuhn

  • The Development of Cognitive Skills To Support Inquiry Learning

    Deanna Kuhn;John Black;Alla Keselman;Danielle Kaplan

  • Teaching and learning science as argument

    Deanna Kuhn

  • Metacognitive Development

    Unknown

  • The development of argumentive discourse skill

    Mark Felton;Deanna Kuhn

  • Cognition, Perception, and Language

    Deanna Kuhn;Robert S. Siegler;William Damon

  • Dialogic Argumentation as a Vehicle for Developing Young Adolescents’ Thinking

    Deanna Kuhn;Amanda Crowell

  • Direct instruction vs. discovery: The long view

    David Dean;Deanna Kuhn

  • How do People Know

    Deanna Kuhn

  • What is epistemological thinking and why does it matter

    Deanna Kuhn;Michael Weinstock

Frequent Co-Authors

James V. Wertsch
James V. Wertsch Washington University in St. Louis
Kurt W. Fischer
Kurt W. Fischer Harvard University
Lawrence Kohlberg
Lawrence Kohlberg Harvard University
Richard M. Lerner
Richard M. Lerner Tufts University
Juan Pascual-Leone
Juan Pascual-Leone York University
Paul B. Baltes
Paul B. Baltes Max Planck Institute for Human Development
Ulman Lindenberger
Ulman Lindenberger Max Planck Institute for Human Development
Graeme S. Halford
Graeme S. Halford Griffith University
David Feldman
David Feldman Stanford University
Larry Nucci
Larry Nucci University of California, Berkeley

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying psychology in the USA can open doors to numerous online degrees and diverse career paths. Many students pursue further specialization as mental health counselors, which involves meeting both education and licensing requirements that vary depending on location.

For example, the mental health counselor requirements in Pittsburgh may differ from other cities in coursework and supervised clinical hours. In Texas, the Plano mental health counselor education requirements emphasize graduate-level studies and state-approved exams. If you’re interested in Florida, you can learn more about how to become a mental health counselor in Port St. Lucie. Out west, the mental health counselor requirements in Portland highlight internships and continuing education as essential components.

Prospective counselors should research the specific requirements in their preferred state and consider accredited online programs that meet those standards. By understanding these requirements, students can map out an educational and career plan that best fits their goals.

Best Scientists Citing Deanna Kuhn

Trending Scientists