World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
77
Citations
35342
World Ranking
1617
National Ranking
962

Deanna Kuhn publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Deanna Kuhn sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 188 publications — 65th percentile

65% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Deanna Kuhn D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Deanna Kuhn sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 77 D-Index — 86th percentile

86% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Deanna Kuhn is affiliated with Columbia University in the United States and conducts research primarily in the fields of psychology and social sciences. Their scholarly focus encompasses developmental and educational psychology, with significant attention to education and critical thinking development. Kuhn's work particularly addresses educational strategies and epistemologies as well as innovative teaching and learning methods.

The scientist's research interests extend beyond psychology into astronomy and astrophysics, contributing to topics such as gamma-ray bursts, supernovae, and broader astronomy and astrophysical research. Additional subjects of their publications include science education and pedagogy, and educator training with historical pedagogy.

Kuhn has published multiple papers in notable academic venues. Recent publications include:

  • "Metacognition matters in many ways," 2021, Educational Psychologist
  • "Yes but: developing a critical stance toward evidence," 2021, International Journal of Science Education
  • "Choose Your Evidence," 2021, Science & Education
  • "Talking about group (but not individual) process aids group performance," 2020, International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning

Frequent coauthors in Kuhn's body of work include Anahid Modrek, M Ginolin, M. Smith, F. Ruppin, and C Barjou-Delayre, each contributing to multiple collaborations.

The venues where Kuhn's research has regularly appeared are diverse, highlighting interdisciplinary approaches. These include arXiv (Cornell University), Science & Education, Astronomy and Astrophysics, International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, and Educational Psychologist.

Best Publications

  • The skills of argument

    Deanna Kuhn

  • The development of scientific thinking skills

    Deanna Kuhn;Eric Amsel;Michael O'Loughlin;Leona Schauble

  • A Developmental Model of Critical Thinking

    Deanna Kuhn

  • Science as argument : Implications for teaching and learning scientific thinking

    Deanna Kuhn

  • Children and adults as intuitive scientists.

    Deanna Kuhn

  • The development of epistemological understanding

    Deanna Kuhn;Richard Cheney;Michael Weinstock

  • Education for Thinking

    Deanna Kuhn

  • Metacognition: A Bridge Between Cognitive Psychology and Educational Practice

    Deanna Kuhn;David Dean

  • The development of argument skills.

    Deanna Kuhn;Wadiya Udell

  • Thinking as Argument

    Deanna Kuhn

  • Effects of Dyadic Interaction on Argumentive Reasoning

    Deanna Kuhn;Victoria Shaw;Mark Felton

  • Strategies of Knowledge Acquisition

    Deanna Kuhn

  • The Development of Cognitive Skills To Support Inquiry Learning

    Deanna Kuhn;John Black;Alla Keselman;Danielle Kaplan

  • Teaching and learning science as argument

    Deanna Kuhn

  • Metacognitive Development

    Unknown

  • The development of argumentive discourse skill

    Mark Felton;Deanna Kuhn

  • Cognition, Perception, and Language

    Deanna Kuhn;Robert S. Siegler;William Damon

  • Dialogic Argumentation as a Vehicle for Developing Young Adolescents’ Thinking

    Deanna Kuhn;Amanda Crowell

  • Direct instruction vs. discovery: The long view

    David Dean;Deanna Kuhn

  • How do People Know

    Deanna Kuhn

  • What is epistemological thinking and why does it matter

    Deanna Kuhn;Michael Weinstock

Frequent Co-Authors

James V. Wertsch
James V. Wertsch Washington University in St. Louis
Kurt W. Fischer
Kurt W. Fischer Harvard University
Lawrence Kohlberg
Lawrence Kohlberg Harvard University
Richard M. Lerner
Richard M. Lerner Tufts University
Juan Pascual-Leone
Juan Pascual-Leone York University
Paul B. Baltes
Paul B. Baltes Max Planck Institute for Human Development
Ulman Lindenberger
Ulman Lindenberger Max Planck Institute for Human Development
Graeme S. Halford
Graeme S. Halford Griffith University
David Feldman
David Feldman Stanford University
Larry Nucci
Larry Nucci University of California, Berkeley

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying psychology in the USA can open doors to numerous online degrees and diverse career paths. Many students pursue further specialization as mental health counselors, which involves meeting both education and licensing requirements that vary depending on location.

For example, the mental health counselor requirements in Pittsburgh may differ from other cities in coursework and supervised clinical hours. In Texas, the Plano mental health counselor education requirements emphasize graduate-level studies and state-approved exams. If you’re interested in Florida, you can learn more about how to become a mental health counselor in Port St. Lucie. Out west, the mental health counselor requirements in Portland highlight internships and continuing education as essential components.

Prospective counselors should research the specific requirements in their preferred state and consider accredited online programs that meet those standards. By understanding these requirements, students can map out an educational and career plan that best fits their goals.

Best Scientists Citing Deanna Kuhn

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles