World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
55
Citations
11148
World Ranking
4705
National Ranking
2123

Charles J. Vierck publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Charles J. Vierck sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 180 publications — 55th percentile

55% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Charles J. Vierck D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Charles J. Vierck sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 55 D-Index — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Charles J. Vierck is affiliated with the University of Florida in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on the fields of medicine, with specific attention to surgery, pathology and forensic medicine, and anesthesiology and pain medicine.

The topics central to Vierck's work include anesthesia and pain management, spine and intervertebral disc pathology, and pain management and treatment.

Recent academic contributions by Vierck include two papers published in "UNC Libraries":

  • Role of primary somatosensory cortex in the coding of pain, 2020, UNC Libraries
  • Long-term changes in purposive and reflexive responses to nociceptive stimulation following anterolateral chordotomy, 2021, UNC Libraries

Vierck has collaborated with several frequent co-authors in their research endeavors. These include:

  • B. L. Whitsel
  • Oleg V. Favorov
  • Alexander Brown
  • Mark Tommerdahl
  • Joel D. Greenspan

The known publication venue for Vierck's work is UNC Libraries, where two of their papers have appeared.

Best Publications

  • Abnormal sensitization and temporal summation of second pain (wind-up) in patients with fibromyalgia syndrome

    Roland Staud;Charles J. Vierck;Richard L. Cannon;Andre P. Mauderli

  • Temporal summation of pain from mechanical stimulation of muscle tissue in normal controls and subjects with fibromyalgia syndrome.

    Roland Staud;Richard C Cannon;Andre P Mauderli;Michael E Robinson

  • Diffuse noxious inhibitory controls (DNIC) attenuate temporal summation of second pain in normal males but not in normal females or fibromyalgia patients.

    Roland Staud;Michael E Robinson;Charles J Vierck;Donald D Price

  • Enhanced temporal summation of second pain and its central modulation in fibromyalgia patients.

    Donald D. Price;Roland Staud;Michael E. Robinson;Andre P. Mauderli

  • The Transition of Acute Postoperative Pain to Chronic Pain: An Integrative Overview of Research on Mechanisms

    C. Richard Chapman;Charles J. Vierck

  • Mechanisms underlying development of spatially distributed chronic pain (fibromyalgia).

    Charles J. Vierck

  • Characteristics of Temporal Summation of Second Pain Sensations Elicited by Brief Contact of Glabrous Skin by a Preheated Thermode

    Charles J. Vierck;Richard L. Cannon;Gentry Fry;William Maixner

  • Role of primary somatosensory cortex in the coding of pain.

    Charles J. Vierck;Barry L. Whitsel;Oleg V. Favorov;Alexander W. Brown

  • Clinical and pre-clinical pain assessment: are we measuring the same thing?

    C. J. Vierck;P. T. Hansson;R. P. Yezierski

  • The effect of maximal exercise on temporal summation of second pain (windup) in patients with fibromyalgia syndrome.

    Charles J. Vierck;Roland Staud;Donald D. Price;Richard L. Cannon

  • Ratings of experimental pain and pain-related negative affect predict clinical pain in patients with fibromyalgia syndrome

    Roland Staud;Michael E Robinson;Charles J Vierck;Richard C Cannon

  • Maintenance of windup of second pain requires less frequent stimulation in fibromyalgia patients compared to normal controls.

    Roland Staud;Donald D Price;Michael E Robinson;Andre P Mauderli

  • Pain reactivity of monkeys after lesions to the dorsal and lateral columns of the spinal cord

    Vierck Cj;Hamilton Dm;Thornby Ji

  • Anterior Parietal Cortical Response to Tactile and Skin-Heating Stimuli Applied to the Same Skin Site

    M. Tommerdahl;K. A. Delemos;C. J. Vierck;O. V. Favorov

  • Pain following spinal cord injury: animal models and mechanistic studies.

    Charles J. Vierck;Phillip Siddall;Robert P. Yezierski

  • Effects of the N-Methyl-D-Aspartate Receptor Antagonist Dextromethorphan on Temporal Summation of Pain are Similar in Fibromyalgia Patients and Normal Control Subjects

    Roland Staud;Charles J. Vierck;Michael E. Robinson;Donald D. Price

  • Selective reduction of second pain sensations by systemic morphine in humans

    Brian Y. Cooper;Charles J. Vierck;David C. Yeomans

  • A critical band filter in touch

    James C. Makous;Robert M. Friedman;Charles J. Vierck

  • Feasibility and safety of neural tissue transplantation in patients with syringomyelia.

    Edward D. Wirth;Paul J. Reier;Richard G. Fessler;Floyd J. Thompson

  • Body pain area and pain-related negative affect predict clinical pain intensity in patients with fibromyalgia.

    Roland Staud;Donald D. Price;Michael E. Robinson;Charles J. Vierck

Frequent Co-Authors

Robert P. Yezierski
Robert P. Yezierski University of Florida
Roland Staud
Roland Staud University of Florida
Donald D. Price
Donald D. Price University of Florida
Michael E. Robinson
Michael E. Robinson University of Florida
Barry L. Whitsel
Barry L. Whitsel University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Yenisel Cruz-Almeida
Yenisel Cruz-Almeida University of Florida
Mark Tommerdahl
Mark Tommerdahl University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Robert M. Caudle
Robert M. Caudle University of Florida
Ronald G. Wiley
Ronald G. Wiley Vanderbilt University
Roger B. Fillingim
Roger B. Fillingim University of Florida

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Charles J. Vierck

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles