World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
39
Citations
4087
World Ranking
8413
National Ranking
3588

Robert M. Caudle publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert M. Caudle sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 103 publications — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Robert M. Caudle D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert M. Caudle sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 15th percentile

15% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Robert M. Caudle is affiliated with the University of Florida in the United States. Their research spans primarily the fields of Medicine and Neuroscience, with significant contributions in subfields such as Physiology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Pharmacology, Sensory Systems, and Behavioral Neuroscience.

The main topics of Caudle's work include Pain Mechanisms and Treatments, Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior, Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research, Stress Responses and Cortisol, Biochemical Effects in Animals, Opioid Use Disorder Treatment, and Ion Channels and Receptors.

Recent publications authored or coauthored by Caudle highlight a focus on orofacial nociception, pain sensitivity, and pharmacological interventions. Notable works include:

  • Pharmacological Characterization of Orofacial Nociception in Female Rats Following Nitroglycerin Administration, 2020, Frontiers in Pharmacology
  • Effects of Oxaliplatin on Facial Sensitivity to Cool Temperatures and TRPM8 Expressing Trigeminal Ganglion Neurons in Mice, 2022, Frontiers in Pain Research

Collaborators frequently working with Caudle comprise John K. Neubert, Wendi Malphurs, Adriaan W. Bruijnzeel, Barry Setlow, and Ariana C. Brice-Tutt. These coauthors have contributed collectively to studies and advancements in neuroscience and pain research related to Caudle's work.

Caudle's contributions appear in multiple reputable publication venues, with repeated publications in Frontiers in Pharmacology, Journal of Visualized Experiments, Scientific Reports, Journal of Pain, and bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory).

Their research often intersects with behavioral neuroscience, focusing on anxiety-like behaviors and neuropharmacological mechanisms, as illustrated by coauthored works such as "Oxycodone decreases anxiety-like behavior in the elevated plus-maze test in male and female rats" (2022, Behavioural Pharmacology) and studies on trigeminal pain modulation published in Neurobiology of Pain (2023).

Best Publications

  • Ligand-induced Dynamic Membrane Changes and Cell Deletion Conferred by Vanilloid Receptor 1

    Zoltan Olah;Tamas Szabo;Laszlo Karai;Chris Hough

  • Expression of the receptor of advanced glycation end products in gingival tissues of type 2 diabetes patients with chronic periodontal disease: a study utilizing immunohistochemistry and RT‐PCR

    J. Katz;I. Bhattacharyya;F. Farkhondeh-Kish;F. M. Perez

  • Use of a novel thermal operant behavioral assay for characterization of orofacial pain sensitivity

    John K. Neubert;Charles G. Widmer;Wendi Malphurs;Heather L. Rossi

  • Kappa-opioids decrease excitatory transmission in the dentate gyrus of the guinea pig hippocampus

    John J. Wagner;Robert M. Caudle;Charles Chavkin

  • A novel interaction between dynorphin(1-13) and an N-methyl-D-aspartate site.

    R.M. Caudle;L. Isaac

  • Kappa 2 opioid receptors inhibit NMDA receptor-mediated synaptic currents in guinea pig CA3 pyramidal cells.

    Robert M. Caudle;Charles Chavkin;Ronald Dubner

  • Receptor for Advanced Glycation End Product (RAGE) Upregulation in Human Gingival Fibroblasts Incubated With Nornicotine

    Joseph Katz;Robert M. Caudle;Indraneel Bhattacharyya;Carol M. Stewart

  • Reduction of conditioned pain modulation in humans by naltrexone: an exploratory study of the effects of pain catastrophizing.

    Christopher D. King;Burel Goodin;Lindsay L. Kindler;Robert M. Caudle

  • Diverse immunocytochemical expression of opioid receptors in electrophysiologically defined cells of rat dorsal root ganglia.

    K.K. Rau;R.M. Caudle;B.Y. Cooper;R.D. Johnson

  • Expression of the Receptor of Advanced Glycation End Products in the Gingival Tissue of Smokers With Generalized Periodontal Disease and After Nornicotine Induction in Primary Gingival Epithelial Cells

    Joseph Katz;Thomas Y.H. Yoon;Song Mao;Richard J. Lamont

  • Adenoviral gene transfer to spinal-cord neurons: intrathecal vs. intraparenchymal administration.

    A.J. Mannes;R.M. Caudle;B.C. O'Connell;M.J. Iadarola

  • Dynorphin: friend or foe?

    Robert M. Caudle;Andrew J. Mannes

  • Peripheral targeting of the trigeminal ganglion via the infraorbital foramen as a therapeutic strategy.

    John K. Neubert;Andrew J. Mannes;Jason Keller;Melanie Wexel

  • Intrathecal dynorphin(1-13) results in an irreversible loss of the tail-flick reflex in rats.

    Robert M. Caudle;Lawrence Isaac

  • Pain control through selective chemo-axotomy of centrally projecting TRPV1+ sensory neurons

    Matthew R. Sapio;John K. Neubert;Danielle M. LaPaglia;Dragan Maric

  • Actions of intrathecal diphtheria toxin-substance P fusion protein on models of persistent pain.

    Rafael Benoliel;Rafael Benoliel;Eli Eliav;Andrew J Mannes;Andrew J Mannes;Robert M Caudle

  • Visceral and somatic hypersensitivity in a subset of rats following TNBS-induced colitis

    QiQi Zhou;Donald D. Price;Robert M. Caudle;G. Nicholas Verne

  • Good pain, bad pain.

    Michael J. Iadarola;Robert M. Caudle

  • Selective up-regulation of NMDA-NR1 receptor expression in myenteric plexus after TNBS induced colitis in rats.

    Qi Qi Zhou;Robert M. Caudle;Donald D. Price;Arseima Y. Del Valle-Pinero

  • Placebo-induced analgesia in an operant pain model in rats.

    Todd A. Nolan;Donald D. Price;Robert M. Caudle;Niall P. Murphy

  • Differentiation between capsaicin-induced allodynia and hyperalgesia using a thermal operant assay.

    John K. Neubert;Heather L. Rossi;Wendi Malphurs;Charles J. Vierck

Frequent Co-Authors

Michael J. Iadarola
Michael J. Iadarola National Institutes of Health
Donald D. Price
Donald D. Price University of Florida
Charles Chavkin
Charles Chavkin University of Washington
Charles J. Vierck
Charles J. Vierck University of Florida
Ronald Dubner
Ronald Dubner University of Maryland, Baltimore
Roger B. Fillingim
Roger B. Fillingim University of Florida
Robert P. Yezierski
Robert P. Yezierski University of Florida
John F. Neumaier
John F. Neumaier University of Washington
R. Douglas Fields
R. Douglas Fields National Institutes of Health
Richard J. Lamont
Richard J. Lamont University of Louisville

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying neuroscience in the USA opens doors to a range of online degrees and career opportunities in related fields. Many students with a neuroscience background consider continuing their education to work directly with individuals through counseling, therapy, or mental health services. Today, high-quality cacrep-accredited programs are available fully online, helping graduates meet industry standards for counseling licensure.

For those interested in helping individuals manage behavioral and emotional challenges, online clinical mental health counseling degrees provide flexible options to develop practical and theoretical expertise. Another promising pathway is marriage and family therapy, where you can support relationships and family dynamics. Explore various mft masters programs that are both accessible and affordable.

Cost is an important factor for many students, so it’s helpful to research how much does it cost to get a masters in psychology before you commit. By considering these related online options, neuroscience graduates can advance their careers while managing both time and expenses effectively.

Best Scientists Citing Robert M. Caudle

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles