World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
36
Citations
5689
World Ranking
8986
National Ranking
3803

Drake Morgan publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Drake Morgan sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 104 publications — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Drake Morgan D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Drake Morgan sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 7th percentile

7% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Drake Morgan is affiliated with the University of Florida in the United States. Their research focuses primarily on the field of Medicine, with a particular emphasis on Physiology, Molecular Biology, and Epidemiology as subfields of study.

The scientist's work encompasses several main topics, including:

  • Gut microbiota and health
  • Biochemical effects in animals
  • Diet and metabolism studies
  • Adipokines, Inflammation, and Metabolic Diseases
  • Adipose Tissue and Metabolism

Drake Morgan has contributed to publications in venues such as:

  • GeroScience
  • PubMed

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Morgan include:

  • "Angiotensin (1-7) delivered orally via probiotic, but not subcutaneously, benefits the gut-brain axis in older rats" (2020), published in GeroScience
  • "Effects of aging and life-long moderate calorie restriction on IL-15 signaling in the rat white adipose tissue." (2020), published in PubMed

They have collaborated frequently with several researchers, including:

  • Thomas W. Buford
  • Yi Sun
  • Lisa M. Roberts
  • Anisha Banerjee
  • Sujitha Peramsetty

Best Publications

  • Social dominance in monkeys: Dopamine D2 receptors and cocaine self-administration

    Drake Morgan;Kathleen A. Grant;H. Donald Gage;Robert H. Mach

  • PET imaging of dopamine D2 receptors during chronic cocaine self-administration in monkeys

    Michael A Nader;Drake Morgan;Drake Morgan;H Donald Gage;Susan H Nader

  • Correction: Corrigendum: Temporal MRI characterization, neurobiochemical and neurobehavioral changes in a mouse repetitive concussive head injury model

    Zhihui Yang;Ping Wang;Drake Morgan;Adriaan W. Bruijnzeel

  • Head‐twitch response in rodents induced by the hallucinogen 2,5‐dimethoxy‐4‐iodoamphetamine: a comprehensive history, a re‐evaluation of mechanisms, and its utility as a model

    Clint E. Canal;Drake Morgan

  • Reduced dopamine terminal function and insensitivity to cocaine following cocaine binge self-administration and deprivation

    Yolanda Mateo;Christopher M Lack;Drake Morgan;David C S Roberts

  • How to make a rat addicted to cocaine

    David C. S. Roberts;Drake Morgan;Yu Liu

  • Explaining the escalation of drug use in substance dependence: models and appropriate animal laboratory tests.

    Gerald Zernig;Serge H. Ahmed;Rudolf N. Cardinal;Drake Morgan

  • Persistent alterations in mesolimbic gene expression with abstinence from cocaine self-administration.

    Willard M Freeman;Kruti M Patel;Robert M Brucklacher;Malinda E Lull

  • Predictors of social status in cynomolgus monkeys (Macaca fascicularis) after group formation.

    Drake Morgan;Kathleen A. Grant;Osric A. Prioleau;Susan H. Nader

  • Adolescent Risk Taking, Cocaine Self-Administration, and Striatal Dopamine Signaling

    Marci R Mitchell;Virginia G Weiss;B Sofia Beas;Drake Morgan

  • Sensitization of the reinforcing effects of self-administered cocaine in rats: effects of dose and intravenous injection speed

    Yu Liu;David C. S. Roberts;Drake Morgan

  • Sensitization to the reinforcing effects of cocaine following binge-abstinent self-administration

    Drake Morgan;David C.S Roberts

  • Increases in the reinforcing efficacy of cocaine after particular histories of reinforcement.

    D. Morgan;K. Brebner;W.J. Lynch;D.C.S. Roberts

  • Effects of positive allosteric modulators of the GABAB receptor on cocaine self-administration in rats

    Mark A. Smith;David L. Yancey;Drake Morgan;Yu Liu

  • An examination of the interactions between the antinociceptive effects of morphine and various mu-opioids: the role of intrinsic efficacy and stimulus intensity.

    Drake Morgan;Charles D. Cook;Mark A. Smith;Mitchell J. Picker

  • Effects of extended-access self-administration and deprivation on breakpoints maintained by cocaine in rats.

    Yu Liu;David C. S. Roberts;Drake Morgan

  • Sensitivity to the Discriminative Stimulus and Antinociceptive Effects of μ Opioids: Role of Strain of Rat, Stimulus Intensity, and Intrinsic Efficacy at the μ Opioid Receptor

    Drake Morgan;Charles D. Cook;Mitchell J. Picker

  • Rapid and Persistent Sensitization to the Reinforcing Effects of Cocaine

    Drake Morgan;Yu Liu;David C S Roberts

  • Gene expression changes in the medial prefrontal cortex and nucleus accumbens following abstinence from cocaine self-administration

    Willard M Freeman;Melinda E Lull;Kruti M Patel;Robert M Brucklacher

  • Comparison of the Reinforcing Effects of Cocaine and Cocaine/Heroin Combinations under Progressive Ratio and Choice Schedules in Rats

    Sara Jane Ward;Drake Morgan;David C S Roberts

  • Characterization of dopamine D1 and D2 receptor function in socially housed cynomolgus monkeys self-administering cocaine

    Paul W. Czoty;Drake Morgan;Erin E. Shannon;H. Donald Gage

Frequent Co-Authors

Philip J. Scarpace
Philip J. Scarpace University of Florida
David C.S. Roberts
David C.S. Roberts Wake Forest University
Emanuele Marzetti
Emanuele Marzetti Agostino Gemelli University Polyclinic
Isabelle M. Côté
Isabelle M. Côté Simon Fraser University
Robert H. Mach
Robert H. Mach University of Pennsylvania
Barry Setlow
Barry Setlow University of Florida
Charles J. Vierck
Charles J. Vierck University of Florida
Robert P. Yezierski
Robert P. Yezierski University of Florida
Jennifer L. Bizon
Jennifer L. Bizon University of Florida
Thomas C. Foster
Thomas C. Foster University of Florida

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Students fascinated by neuroscience often discover rewarding career paths in related fields such as counseling and psychology. Numerous universities in the USA offer flexible distance learning options for those interested in expanding their expertise in these areas without relocating.

For students seeking recognized credentials in counseling, there are cacrep-accredited online programs which meet high professional standards. If your interest lies in supporting mental health, you can also find a wide range of online mental health degree programs designed to prepare you for clinical or community-based roles.

Those aspiring to specialize in marriage and family therapy have the option to pursue an lmft degree online, leading to licensure and advanced practice. Another promising pathway is earning a masters of psychology online, which opens doors to research, education, or clinical roles.

Exploring these online degrees provides neuroscience students with diverse opportunities and specialized career trajectories in human behavior, therapy, and mental health services.

Best Scientists Citing Drake Morgan

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles