World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Dietrich Rueschemeyer

Dietrich Rueschemeyer

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking National Ranking Publications Citations
Political Science 34 784 413 93 21639

Dietrich Rueschemeyer publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Dietrich Rueschemeyer between 1960 and 2019, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Dietrich Rueschemeyer published across 60 years, from 1960 to 2019, averaging 1.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 8 publications in 1985. 1 of the 99 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1960 to 2019. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 8. Peak 8 publications in 1985. 1960: 1 publication 1961: 0 publications 1962: 0 publications 1963: 1 publication 1964: 0 publications 1965: 0 publications 1966: 1 publication 1967: 0 publications 1968: 1 publication 1969: 0 publications 1970: 1 publication 1971: 0 publications 1972: 0 publications 1973: 6 publications 1974: 0 publications 1975: 1 publication 1976: 0 publications 1977: 2 publications 1978: 1 publication 1979: 0 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 1 publication 1983: 1 publication 1984: 1 publication 1985: 8 publications 1986: 3 publications 1987: 1 publication 1988: 2 publications 1989: 1 publication 1990: 2 publications 1991: 2 publications 1992: 3 publications 1993: 2 publications 1994: 1 publication 1995: 1 publication 1996: 1 publication 1997: 4 publications 1998: 2 publications 1999: 1 publication 2000: 3 publications 2001: 1 publication 2002: 2 publications 2003: 7 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 7 publications 2006: 2 publications 2007: 0 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 7 publications 2010: 2 publications 2011: 0 publications 2012: 0 publications 2013: 1 publication 2014: 1 publication 2015: 0 publications 2016: 0 publications 2017: 8 publications 2018: 0 publications 2019: 1 publication
1960 2019

99 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Dietrich Rueschemeyer: publications per year, 1960 to 2019
Year Publications
1960 1
1961 0
1962 0
1963 1
1964 0
1965 0
1966 1
1967 0
1968 1
1969 0
1970 1
1971 0
1972 0
1973 6
1974 0
1975 1
1976 0
1977 2
1978 1
1979 0
1980 0
1981 0
1982 1
1983 1
1984 1
1985 8
1986 3
1987 1
1988 2
1989 1
1990 2
1991 2
1992 3
1993 2
1994 1
1995 1
1996 1
1997 4
1998 2
1999 1
2000 3
2001 1
2002 2
2003 7
2004 2
2005 7
2006 2
2007 0
2008 3
2009 7
2010 2
2011 0
2012 0
2013 1
2014 1
2015 0
2016 0
2017 8
2018 0
2019 1
Total 99
Download as CSV

Dietrich Rueschemeyer publication distribution in Political Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Political Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dietrich Rueschemeyer sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
20 40 60 80
Bar chart with 61 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 36–40 to 333+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 97. Most scientists, 97, have 333+ publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 333 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 91–95 publications, is where this scientist sits. 36–40 publications: 10 scientists 41–45 publications: 11 scientists 46–50 publications: 25 scientists 51–55 publications: 27 scientists 56–60 publications: 44 scientists 61–65 publications: 52 scientists 66–70 publications: 62 scientists 71–75 publications: 62 scientists 76–80 publications: 79 scientists 81–85 publications: 71 scientists 86–90 publications: 82 scientists 91–95 publications: 65 scientists 96–100 publications: 85 scientists 101–105 publications: 76 scientists 106–110 publications: 66 scientists 111–115 publications: 78 scientists 116–120 publications: 67 scientists 121–125 publications: 73 scientists 126–130 publications: 73 scientists 131–135 publications: 64 scientists 136–140 publications: 45 scientists 141–145 publications: 53 scientists 146–150 publications: 44 scientists 151–155 publications: 45 scientists 156–160 publications: 33 scientists 161–165 publications: 32 scientists 166–170 publications: 28 scientists 171–175 publications: 31 scientists 176–180 publications: 29 scientists 181–185 publications: 27 scientists 186–190 publications: 36 scientists 191–195 publications: 27 scientists 196–200 publications: 24 scientists 201–205 publications: 16 scientists 206–210 publications: 16 scientists 211–215 publications: 19 scientists 216–220 publications: 16 scientists 221–225 publications: 17 scientists 226–230 publications: 18 scientists 231–235 publications: 23 scientists 236–240 publications: 17 scientists 241–245 publications: 13 scientists 246–250 publications: 17 scientists 251–255 publications: 9 scientists 256–260 publications: 13 scientists 261–265 publications: 8 scientists 266–270 publications: 12 scientists 271–275 publications: 8 scientists 276–280 publications: 10 scientists 281–285 publications: 13 scientists 286–290 publications: 13 scientists 291–295 publications: 5 scientists 296–300 publications: 6 scientists 301–305 publications: 11 scientists 306–310 publications: 9 scientists 311–315 publications: 6 scientists 316–320 publications: 4 scientists 321–325 publications: 4 scientists 326–330 publications: 2 scientists 331–332 publications: 5 scientists 333+ publications: 97 scientists
36–40 publications 333+

This scientist: 93 publications — 28th percentile

28% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 333 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Political Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 2,033 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
36–40 10
41–45 11
46–50 25
51–55 27
56–60 44
61–65 52
66–70 62
71–75 62
76–80 79
81–85 71
86–90 82
91–95 65 93
96–100 85
101–105 76
106–110 66
111–115 78
116–120 67
121–125 73
126–130 73
131–135 64
136–140 45
141–145 53
146–150 44
151–155 45
156–160 33
161–165 32
166–170 28
171–175 31
176–180 29
181–185 27
186–190 36
191–195 27
196–200 24
201–205 16
206–210 16
211–215 19
216–220 16
221–225 17
226–230 18
231–235 23
236–240 17
241–245 13
246–250 17
251–255 9
256–260 13
261–265 8
266–270 12
271–275 8
276–280 10
281–285 13
286–290 13
291–295 5
296–300 6
301–305 11
306–310 9
311–315 6
316–320 4
321–325 4
326–330 2
331–332 5
333+ 97
Download as CSV

Dietrich Rueschemeyer D-index placement in Political Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Political Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dietrich Rueschemeyer sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100
Bar chart with 43 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 20 to 62+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 100. Most scientists, 100, have 62+ D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 62 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 34 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 20 D-Index: 76 scientists 21 D-Index: 79 scientists 22 D-Index: 84 scientists 23 D-Index: 68 scientists 24 D-Index: 88 scientists 25 D-Index: 82 scientists 26 D-Index: 76 scientists 27 D-Index: 75 scientists 28 D-Index: 99 scientists 29 D-Index: 96 scientists 30 D-Index: 96 scientists 31 D-Index: 81 scientists 32 D-Index: 86 scientists 33 D-Index: 81 scientists 34 D-Index: 84 scientists 35 D-Index: 72 scientists 36 D-Index: 58 scientists 37 D-Index: 53 scientists 38 D-Index: 48 scientists 39 D-Index: 40 scientists 40 D-Index: 40 scientists 41 D-Index: 32 scientists 42 D-Index: 26 scientists 43 D-Index: 25 scientists 44 D-Index: 33 scientists 45 D-Index: 33 scientists 46 D-Index: 17 scientists 47 D-Index: 21 scientists 48 D-Index: 22 scientists 49 D-Index: 18 scientists 50 D-Index: 19 scientists 51 D-Index: 19 scientists 52 D-Index: 15 scientists 53 D-Index: 14 scientists 54 D-Index: 10 scientists 55 D-Index: 13 scientists 56 D-Index: 9 scientists 57 D-Index: 11 scientists 58 D-Index: 12 scientists 59 D-Index: 10 scientists 60 D-Index: 5 scientists 61 D-Index: 7 scientists 62+ D-Index: 100 scientists
20 D-Index 62+

This scientist: 34 D-Index — 62nd percentile

62% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 62 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Political Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 2,033 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
20 76
21 79
22 84
23 68
24 88
25 82
26 76
27 75
28 99
29 96
30 96
31 81
32 86
33 81
34 84 34
35 72
36 58
37 53
38 48
39 40
40 40
41 32
42 26
43 25
44 33
45 33
46 17
47 21
48 22
49 18
50 19
51 19
52 15
53 14
54 10
55 13
56 9
57 11
58 12
59 10
60 5
61 7
62+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Dietrich Rueschemeyer is affiliated with Brown University in the United States. Their academic profile does not currently list any recent publications or frequent co-authors, which suggests a focus beyond frequent collaboration or rapid publication cycles in recent years.

Rueschemeyer's work is not currently associated with any specific main fields of study, subfields, or main topics of work, according to available data. Additionally, the researcher does not have a recorded history of book publications or frequent appearances in particular publication venues. This absence of common bibliographic data may indicate a focus on less traditional dissemination formats or interdisciplinary engagements not captured by standard metrics.

No awards have been recorded for Rueschemeyer, and the available data confirm they are currently active in their professional capacity without indications of retirement or passing.

Given the limited data, it is appropriate to highlight that Dietrich Rueschemeyer's academic presence is tied primarily to their institutional role at Brown University, with other typical markers of scholarly output and recognition not presently documented in common academic databases.

Best Publications

  • Bringing the State Back in

    Peter B. Evans;Dietrich Rueschemeyer;Theda Skocpol

  • Capitalist development and democracy

    Dietrich Rueschemeyer;Evelyne Stephens;John Stephens

  • Capitalist Development and Democracy.

    Unknown

  • Comparative Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences

    James Mahoney;Dietrich Rueschemeyer

  • Aligning Ontology and Methodology in Comparative Research

    Peter A. Hall;James Mahoney;Dietrich Rueschemeyer

  • The Impact of Economic Development on Democracy

    Evelyne Huber;Dietrich Rueschemeyer;John D. Stephens

  • Power and the division of labour

    Dietrich Rueschemeyer

  • Bringing the State Back In: The State and Economic Transformation: Toward an Analysis of the Conditions Underlying Effective Intervention

    Dietrich Rueschemeyer;Peter B. Evans

  • The Paradoxes of Contemporary Democracy: Formal, Participatory, and Social Dimensions

    Evelyne Huber;Dietrich Rueschemeyer;John D. Stephens

  • Comparative Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences: COMPARATIVE HISTORICAL ANALYSIS

    James Mahoney;Dietrich Rueschemeyer

  • CAN ONE OR A FEW CASES YIELD THEORETICAL GAINS

    Dietrich Rueschemeyer

  • Professional Autonomy and the Social Control of Expertise

    Dietrich Rueschemeyer

  • Lawyers and their society

    Dietrich Rueschemeyer

  • The Quality of Democracy: Addressing Inequality

    Dietrich Rueschemeyer

  • States, Social Knowledge, and the Origins of Modern Social Policies

    Dietrich Rueschemeyer;Theda Skocpol

  • Bringing the State Back In: On the Road toward a More Adequate Understanding of the State

    Peter B. Evans;Dietrich Rueschemeyer;Theda Skocpol

  • Doctors and Lawyers: A Comment on the Theory of the Professions

    Dietrich Rueschemeyer

  • Tilly, Charles. 1985. "War Making and the State Making as Organized Crime." In

    Peter B. Evans;Dietrich Rueschemeyer;Theda Skocpol

  • Comparative Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences: Cambridge Studies in Comparative Politics

    James Mahoney;Dietrich Rueschemeyer

  • New Theoretical Perspectives on Democratization@@@Economic Reforms in New Democracies: A Social-Democratic Approach@@@Politician's Dilemma: Building State Capacity in Latin America@@@Elites and Democratic Consolidation in Latin America and Southern Europe@@@Capitalist Development and Democracy

    Karen L. Remmer;Luiz Carlos Bresser Pereira;Jose Maria Maravall;Adam Przeworski

  • Globalization and the future of the welfare state

    Miguel Glatzer;Dietrich Rueschemeyer

  • States and Development: Historical Antecedents of Stagnation and Advance

    Matthew Lange;Dietrich Rueschemeyer

  • Comparing Historical Sequences - A Powerful Tool for Causal Analysis. A Reply to John Goldthorpe's "Current Issues in Comparative Macro-Sociology"

    Dietrich Rueschemeyer;John Stephens

  • States, Social Knowledge, and the Origins of Modern Social Policies.

    Jane Jenson;Dietrich Rueschemeyer;Theda Skocpol

Frequent Co-Authors

Theda Skocpol
Theda Skocpol Harvard University
Peter Evans
Peter Evans University of California, Berkeley
James Mahoney
James Mahoney Northwestern University
Louis Putterman
Louis Putterman Brown University
Richard Gunther
Richard Gunther The Ohio State University
Richard Hyman
Richard Hyman London School of Economics and Political Science
Adam Przeworski
Adam Przeworski New York University
Jane Jenson
Jane Jenson University of Montreal
Ira Katznelson
Ira Katznelson Columbia University
Karen L. Remmer
Karen L. Remmer Duke University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Political Science in the USA opens doors to a variety of related fields and flexible learning options. For those interested in connecting political concepts to historical contexts, degrees in history can provide deeper analytical skills and a broader understanding of global developments.

Online programs offer increased accessibility for busy students or working professionals. By pursuing an online master interdisciplinary studies degree, you can customize your study focus—blending political science with economics, communication, or sociology for a competitive edge.

Those passionate about America’s political evolution might consider a master's in american history online. This specialized degree can lead to roles in education, research, or policy analysis.

If you’re aiming to enter the workforce quickly or pivot your career, there are easy certifications to get that pay well. These certifications can complement a Political Science degree—helping you land jobs in public administration, legal assistance, or project management.

Best Scientists Citing Dietrich Rueschemeyer

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles