World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Biology and Biochemistry 70 6940 6402 3197 2870 429 19674

Robert H. Mach publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Robert H. Mach between 1986 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Robert H. Mach published across 41 years, from 1986 to 2026, averaging 15.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 95 publications in 2023. 68 of the 644 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
20 40 60 80
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1986 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 95. Peak 95 publications in 2023. 1986: 1 publication 1987: 1 publication 1988: 4 publications 1989: 2 publications 1990: 4 publications 1991: 3 publications 1992: 2 publications 1993: 4 publications 1994: 1 publication 1995: 4 publications 1996: 2 publications 1997: 7 publications 1998: 3 publications 1999: 11 publications 2000: 9 publications 2001: 10 publications 2002: 4 publications 2003: 2 publications 2004: 6 publications 2005: 9 publications 2006: 15 publications 2007: 14 publications 2008: 10 publications 2009: 23 publications 2010: 24 publications 2011: 25 publications 2012: 29 publications 2013: 26 publications 2014: 17 publications 2015: 20 publications 2016: 27 publications 2017: 28 publications 2018: 29 publications 2019: 25 publications 2020: 26 publications 2021: 18 publications 2022: 21 publications 2023: 95 publications 2024: 15 publications 2025: 66 publications 2026: 2 publications
1986 2026

644 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Robert H. Mach: publications per year, 1986 to 2026
Year Publications
1986 1
1987 1
1988 4
1989 2
1990 4
1991 3
1992 2
1993 4
1994 1
1995 4
1996 2
1997 7
1998 3
1999 11
2000 9
2001 10
2002 4
2003 2
2004 6
2005 9
2006 15
2007 14
2008 10
2009 23
2010 24
2011 25
2012 29
2013 26
2014 17
2015 20
2016 27
2017 28
2018 29
2019 25
2020 26
2021 18
2022 21
2023 95
2024 15
2025 66
2026 2
Total 644
Download as CSV

Robert H. Mach publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert H. Mach sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 100 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 47–56 to 1,028+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 980. Most scientists, 980, have 127–136 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 427–436 publications, is where this scientist sits. 47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 413 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 848 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 949 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 840 scientists 207–216 publications: 733 scientists 217–226 publications: 708 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 417 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 196 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 59 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientist 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientist 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47–56 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 429 publications — 92nd percentile

92% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Biology and Biochemistry scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 19,587 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
47–56 8
57–66 35
67–76 106
77–86 231
87–96 413
97–106 546
107–116 704
117–126 848
127–136 980
137–146 942
147–156 969
157–166 949
167–176 951
177–186 915
187–196 787
197–206 840
207–216 733
217–226 708
227–236 651
237–246 605
247–256 510
257–266 524
267–276 434
277–286 417
287–296 350
297–306 363
307–316 315
317–326 296
327–336 261
337–346 240
347–356 219
357–366 196
367–376 154
377–386 161
387–396 155
397–406 145
407–416 124
417–426 112
427–436 132 429
437–446 116
447–456 99
457–466 81
467–476 91
477–486 80
487–496 80
497–506 59
507–516 36
517–526 46
527–536 54
537–546 44
547–556 43
557–566 43
567–576 42
577–586 25
587–596 34
597–606 23
607–616 33
617–626 31
627–636 27
637–646 25
647–656 28
657–666 34
667–676 18
677–686 16
687–696 10
697–706 12
707–716 21
717–726 12
727–736 12
737–746 10
747–756 7
757–766 13
767–776 15
777–786 13
787–796 9
797–806 9
807–816 7
817–826 4
827–836 9
837–846 7
847–856 3
857–866 5
867–876 5
877–886 11
887–896 3
897–906 4
907–916 7
917–926 5
927–936 6
937–946 6
947–956 3
957–966 7
967–976 2
977–986 2
987–996 1
997–1,006 5
1,007–1,016 2
1,017–1,026 2
1,027 1
1,028+ 100
Download as CSV

Robert H. Mach D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert H. Mach sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000 1,250
Bar chart with 65 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 167+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,253. Most scientists, 1,253, have 58–59 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 70–71 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 316 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 899 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,025 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,149 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,235 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,162 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,130 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,031 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 714 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 71 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40–41 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 70 D-Index — 65th percentile

65% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Biology and Biochemistry scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 19,587 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 80
42–43 183
44–45 316
46–47 504
48–49 718
50–51 899
52–53 1,025
54–55 1,149
56–57 1,235
58–59 1,253
60–61 1,162
62–63 1,130
64–65 1,031
66–67 897
68–69 814
70–71 714 70
72–73 709
74–75 596
76–77 512
78–79 473
80–81 412
82–83 373
84–85 358
86–87 285
88–89 273
90–91 227
92–93 208
94–95 193
96–97 153
98–99 157
100–101 148
102–103 120
104–105 113
106–107 100
108–109 86
110–111 67
112–113 71
114–115 73
116–117 64
118–119 53
120–121 60
122–123 54
124–125 43
126–127 38
128–129 49
130–131 26
132–133 18
134–135 23
136–137 32
138–139 32
140–141 27
142–143 19
144–145 22
146–147 12
148–149 16
150–151 14
152–153 10
154–155 13
156–157 10
158–159 7
160–161 9
162–163 13
164–165 4
166 4
167+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Robert H. Mach is affiliated with the University of Pennsylvania in the United States. Their research spans several fields, primarily focusing on Medicine as well as Biochemistry, Genetics, and Molecular Biology. Within these broader categories, the scientist's work emphasizes subfields such as Molecular Biology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Neurology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, and Physiology.

The scientist's research topics cover various aspects of neuroscience, pharmacology, and cancer therapy. Key areas of study include Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments, Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling, PARP inhibition in cancer therapy, Pharmacological Receptor Mechanisms and Effects, Alzheimer's disease research and treatments, Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications, and Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research.

Notable recent publications by Robert H. Mach include:

  • ALC1 links chromatin accessibility to PARP inhibitor response in homologous recombination-deficient cells, 2021, Nature Cell Biology
  • The Sigma-2 Receptor/TMEM97, PGRMC1, and LDL Receptor Complex Are Responsible for the Cellular Uptake of Aβ42 and Its Protein Aggregates, 2020, Molecular Neurobiology
  • Identification of a nanomolar affinity α-synuclein fibril imaging probe by ultra-high throughput in silico screening, 2020, Chemical Science
  • The Biological Function of Sigma-2 Receptor/TMEM97 and Its Utility in PET Imaging Studies in Cancer, 2020, Cancers
  • A multivalent mRNA-LNP vaccine protects against Clostridioides difficile infection, 2024, Science

Robert H. Mach frequently publishes in venues such as bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Nuclear Medicine and Biology, Journal of Nuclear Medicine, International Journal of Molecular Sciences, and EJNMMI Radiopharmacy and Chemistry. These journals reflect a blend of basic science, medical imaging, and molecular biology research focuses.

The scientist collaborates regularly with other researchers, including Chia-Ju Hsieh, Hsiaoju Lee, Aladdin Riad, Ji Youn Lee, and E. James Petersson, indicating active engagement in multidisciplinary projects and co-authored investigations.

Best Publications

  • Inverse relation between in vivo amyloid imaging load and cerebrospinal fluid Abeta42 in humans.

    Anne M. Fagan;Mark A. Mintun;Robert H. Mach;Sang-Yoon Lee

  • [11C]PIB in a nondemented population: potential antecedent marker of Alzheimer disease.

    M. A. Mintun;G. N. LaRossa;Y. I. Sheline;C. S. Dence

  • Social dominance in monkeys: Dopamine D2 receptors and cocaine self-administration

    Drake Morgan;Kathleen A. Grant;H. Donald Gage;Robert H. Mach

  • PET imaging of dopamine D2 receptors during chronic cocaine self-administration in monkeys

    Michael A Nader;Drake Morgan;Drake Morgan;H Donald Gage;Susan H Nader

  • Cerebrospinal fluid tau and ptau181 increase with cortical amyloid deposition in cognitively normal individuals: Implications for future clinical trials of Alzheimer's disease

    Anne M. Fagan;Mark A. Mintun;Aarti R. Shah;Patricia Aldea

  • Spatial correlation between brain aerobic glycolysis and amyloid-β (Aβ) deposition

    Andrei G. Vlassenko;S. Neil Vaishnavi;Lars Couture;Dana Sacco

  • Epigenetic Priming of Memory Updating during Reconsolidation to Attenuate Remote Fear Memories

    Johannes Gräff;Nadine F. Joseph;Nadine F. Joseph;Meryl E. Horn;Alireza Samiei

  • Identification of the PGRMC1 protein complex as the putative sigma-2 receptor binding site

    Jinbin Xu;Chenbo Zeng;Wenhua Chu;Fenghui Pan

  • Sigma-2 receptors as a biomarker of proliferation in solid tumours.

    K T Wheeler;L M Wang;C A Wallen;S R Childers

  • Alzheimer's Therapeutics Targeting Amyloid Beta 1–42 Oligomers II: Sigma-2/PGRMC1 Receptors Mediate Abeta 42 Oligomer Binding and Synaptotoxicity

    Nicholas J. Izzo;Jinbin Xu;Chenbo Zeng;Molly J. Kirk;Molly J. Kirk

  • Consensus nomenclature rules for radiopharmaceutical chemistry - Setting the record straight.

    Heinz H. Coenen;Antony D. Gee;Michael Adam;Gunnar Antoni

  • Evaluation of 5-ethynyl-2′-deoxyuridine staining as a sensitive and reliable method for studying cell proliferation in the adult nervous system

    Chenbo Zeng;Fenghui Pan;Lynne A. Jones;Miranda M. Lim

  • Sigma 2 receptors as potential biomarkers of proliferation in breast cancer

    Robert H. Mach;Cynthia R. Smith;Isaf Al-Nabulsi;Brian R. Whirrett

  • Effect of social status on striatal dopamine D2 receptor binding characteristics in cynomolgus monkeys assessed with positron emission tomography.

    Kathleen A. Grant;Carol A. Shively;Michael A. Nader;Richard L. Ehrenkaufer

  • Ibogaine possesses a selective affinity for σ2 receptors

    Robert H. Mach;Cynthia R. Smith;Steven R. Childers

  • The σ2 Receptor: A Novel Protein for the Imaging and Treatment of Cancer

    Robert H. Mach;Chenbo Zeng;William G. Hawkins

  • Subcellular localization of sigma-2 receptors in breast cancer cells using two-photon and confocal microscopy.

    Chenbo Zeng;Suwanna Vangveravong;Jinbin Xu;Katherine C. Chang

  • Selective sigma-2 ligands preferentially bind to pancreatic adenocarcinomas: applications in diagnostic imaging and therapy.

    Hiroyuki Kashiwagi;Jonathan E McDunn;Peter O Simon;Peter S Goedegebuure

  • N-benzylisatin sulfonamide analogues as potent caspase-3 inhibitors: synthesis, in vitro activity, and molecular modeling studies.

    Wenhua Chu;Jun Zhang;Chenbo Zeng;Justin Rothfuss

  • Potential antecedent marker of Alzheimer disease

    M. A. Mintun;G. N. LaRossa;Y. I. Sheline;C. S. Dence

Frequent Co-Authors

David A. Mankoff
David A. Mankoff University of Pennsylvania
William G. Hawkins
William G. Hawkins Washington University in St. Louis
Michael J. Welch
Michael J. Welch Washington University in St. Louis
Mark A. Mintun
Mark A. Mintun University of Pennsylvania
Steven R. Childers
Steven R. Childers Wake Forest University
Hank F. Kung
Hank F. Kung University of Pennsylvania
Joel S. Perlmutter
Joel S. Perlmutter Washington University in St. Louis
Richard S. Hotchkiss
Richard S. Hotchkiss Washington University in St. Louis
Roger A. Greenberg
Roger A. Greenberg University of Pennsylvania
John C. Morris
John C. Morris Washington University in St. Louis

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Students pursuing Biology and Biochemistry in the USA often explore diverse career pathways beyond traditional research roles. The evolving healthcare industry offers growing opportunities in medical coding and health information management. Many who seek flexibility consider online programs, and there are affordable online him programs for those looking to earn a degree while balancing other commitments.

Graduates may pursue roles such as a certified professional coder, specializing in translating medical records into standardized codes for billing and analysis. Understanding how to enter the field is key, and learning medical coder salary expectations can help with career planning.

Before committing, it’s helpful to weigh the is medical coding a good job question by considering the field’s pros and cons. Whether aiming for clinical, laboratory, or health information roles, a degree in Biology or Biochemistry opens the door to a wide array of promising and adaptable careers.

Best Scientists Citing Robert H. Mach

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles