World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Plant Science and Agronomy

D-Index
40
Citations
5662
World Ranking
3964
National Ranking
989

Jack C. McCarty publication distribution in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jack C. McCarty sits on this spectrum.

36–40 publications: 2 scientists 41–45 publications: 7 scientists 46–50 publications: 40 scientists 51–55 publications: 58 scientists 56–60 publications: 60 scientists 61–65 publications: 107 scientists 66–70 publications: 130 scientists 71–75 publications: 153 scientists 76–80 publications: 191 scientists 81–85 publications: 199 scientists 86–90 publications: 206 scientists 91–95 publications: 218 scientists 96–100 publications: 226 scientists 101–105 publications: 227 scientists 106–110 publications: 247 scientists 111–115 publications: 255 scientists 116–120 publications: 253 scientists 121–125 publications: 233 scientists 126–130 publications: 219 scientists 131–135 publications: 201 scientists 136–140 publications: 194 scientists 141–145 publications: 176 scientists 146–150 publications: 157 scientists 151–155 publications: 147 scientists 156–160 publications: 151 scientists 161–165 publications: 159 scientists 166–170 publications: 137 scientists 171–175 publications: 128 scientists 176–180 publications: 126 scientists 181–185 publications: 98 scientists 186–190 publications: 114 scientists 191–195 publications: 100 scientists 196–200 publications: 90 scientists 201–205 publications: 71 scientists 206–210 publications: 98 scientists 211–215 publications: 70 scientists 216–220 publications: 86 scientists 221–225 publications: 61 scientists 226–230 publications: 58 scientists 231–235 publications: 53 scientists 236–240 publications: 64 scientists 241–245 publications: 39 scientists 246–250 publications: 46 scientists 251–255 publications: 51 scientists 256–260 publications: 36 scientists 261–265 publications: 44 scientists 266–270 publications: 35 scientists 271–275 publications: 30 scientists 276–280 publications: 33 scientists 281–285 publications: 35 scientists 286–290 publications: 36 scientists 291–295 publications: 26 scientists 296–300 publications: 26 scientists 301–305 publications: 31 scientists 306–310 publications: 30 scientists 311–315 publications: 21 scientists 316–320 publications: 29 scientists 321–325 publications: 14 scientists 326–330 publications: 15 scientists 331–335 publications: 15 scientists 336–340 publications: 17 scientists 341–345 publications: 15 scientists 346–350 publications: 12 scientists 351–355 publications: 17 scientists 356–360 publications: 18 scientists 361–365 publications: 12 scientists 366–370 publications: 11 scientists 371–375 publications: 6 scientists 376–380 publications: 6 scientists 381–385 publications: 11 scientists 386–390 publications: 9 scientists 391–395 publications: 10 scientists 396–400 publications: 8 scientists 401–405 publications: 4 scientists 406–410 publications: 9 scientists 411–415 publications: 11 scientists 416–420 publications: 4 scientists 421–425 publications: 7 scientists 426–430 publications: 4 scientists 431–435 publications: 3 scientists 436–440 publications: 5 scientists 441–445 publications: 8 scientists 446–450 publications: 6 scientists 451–455 publications: 7 scientists 456–460 publications: 5 scientists 461–465 publications: 6 scientists 466 publications: 2 scientists 467+ publications: 99 scientists
36 publications 467+

This scientist: 190 publications — 74th percentile

74% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more.

Jack C. McCarty D-index placement in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jack C. McCarty sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 200 scientists 31 D-Index: 236 scientists 32 D-Index: 253 scientists 33 D-Index: 283 scientists 34 D-Index: 288 scientists 35 D-Index: 240 scientists 36 D-Index: 246 scientists 37 D-Index: 243 scientists 38 D-Index: 247 scientists 39 D-Index: 229 scientists 40 D-Index: 232 scientists 41 D-Index: 230 scientists 42 D-Index: 228 scientists 43 D-Index: 219 scientists 44 D-Index: 193 scientists 45 D-Index: 164 scientists 46 D-Index: 158 scientists 47 D-Index: 143 scientists 48 D-Index: 131 scientists 49 D-Index: 127 scientists 50 D-Index: 122 scientists 51 D-Index: 122 scientists 52 D-Index: 110 scientists 53 D-Index: 102 scientists 54 D-Index: 98 scientists 55 D-Index: 79 scientists 56 D-Index: 85 scientists 57 D-Index: 88 scientists 58 D-Index: 91 scientists 59 D-Index: 62 scientists 60 D-Index: 61 scientists 61 D-Index: 59 scientists 62 D-Index: 54 scientists 63 D-Index: 61 scientists 64 D-Index: 59 scientists 65 D-Index: 58 scientists 66 D-Index: 41 scientists 67 D-Index: 49 scientists 68 D-Index: 39 scientists 69 D-Index: 32 scientists 70 D-Index: 40 scientists 71 D-Index: 47 scientists 72 D-Index: 38 scientists 73 D-Index: 28 scientists 74 D-Index: 29 scientists 75 D-Index: 28 scientists 76 D-Index: 22 scientists 77 D-Index: 21 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 26 scientists 80 D-Index: 19 scientists 81 D-Index: 16 scientists 82 D-Index: 12 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 14 scientists 85 D-Index: 11 scientists 86 D-Index: 17 scientists 87 D-Index: 13 scientists 88 D-Index: 10 scientists 89 D-Index: 12 scientists 90 D-Index: 18 scientists 91 D-Index: 16 scientists 92 D-Index: 16 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 12 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 9 scientists 97 D-Index: 9 scientists 98 D-Index: 11 scientists 99 D-Index: 12 scientists 100 D-Index: 5 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 4 scientists 103 D-Index: 11 scientists 104 D-Index: 5 scientists 105 D-Index: 9 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 4 scientists 108 D-Index: 8 scientists 109+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 109+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 42nd percentile

42% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Simple Sequence Repeat–Based Assessment of Genetic Diversity in Cotton Race Stock Accessions

    S. Liu;R. G. Cantrell;J. C. McCarty;J. McD. Stewart

  • Effectiveness of fruiting sites in cotton: yield.

    Johnie N. Jenkins;J. C. McCarty;W. L. Parrott

  • An RFLP linkage map of Upland cotton, Gossypium hirsutum L.

    Zachary W. Shappley;Johnie N. Jenkins;William R. Meredith;Jack C. McCarty

  • Degree of Pollen Dispersal by Insects from a Field Test of Genetically Engineered Cotton

    Paul F. Umbeck;Kenneth A. Barton;Erik V. Nordheim;Jack C. McCarty

  • Registration of 17 upland (Gossypium hirsutum) cotton germplasm lines disomic for different G. barbadense chromosome or arm substitutions.

    D.M. Stelly;S. Saha;D.A. Raska;J.N. Jenkins

  • Introgression genetics and breeding between Upland and Pima cotton: a review

    Jinfa Zhang;Richard G. Percy;Jack C. McCarty

  • Genetic distance among selected cotton genotypes and its relationship with F2 performance

    O. A. Gutiérrez;S. Basu;S. Saha;J. N. Jenkins

  • F2 Hybrids of Host Plant Germplasm and Cotton Cultivars: I. Heterosis and Combining Ability for Lint Yield and Yield Components

    Bing Tang;Johnie N. Jenkins;J. C. McCarty;C. E. Watson;C. E. Watson

  • Quantitative trait loci analysis of fiber quality traits using a random-mated recombinant inbred population in Upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)

    David D Fang;Johnie N Jenkins;Dewayne D Deng;Jack C McCarty

  • Evaluation of genetic variances, heritabilities and correlations for yield and fiber traits among cotton F(2) hybrid populations

    Bing Tang;J. N. Jenkins;C. E. Watson;J. C. McCarty

  • Fruiting efficiency in cotton: boll size and boll set percentage.

    Johnie N. Jenkins;J. C. McCarty;W. L. Parrott

  • Primitive accession derived germplasm by cultivar crosses as sources for cotton improvement. I. Phenotypic values and variance components

    Jack C. McCarty;Johnie N. Jenkins;Jixiang Wu

  • SSR markers closely associated with genes for resistance to root-knot nematode on chromosomes 11 and 14 of Upland cotton

    Osman A. Gutiérrez;Johnie N. Jenkins;Jack C. McCarty;Martin J. Wubben

  • QTLs for node of first fruiting branch in a cross of an upland cotton, Gossypium hirsutum L., cultivar with primitive accession Texas 701

    Yufang Guo;Jack C. McCarty;Johnie N. Jenkins;Sukumar Saha

  • Registration of nine cotton germplasm lines resistant to root-knot nematode

    R. L. Shepherd;J. C. McCarty;J. N. Jenkins;W. L. Parrott

  • Efficacy of Cry1F Insecticidal Protein in Maize and Cotton for Control of Fall Armyworm (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae)

    Unknown

  • Association of Root-Knot Nematode Resistance Genes with Simple Sequence Repeat Markers on Two Chromosomes in Cotton

    Pavathi Ynturi;Johnie N. Jenkins;Jack C. McCarty;Osman A. Gutierrez

  • Genetic Effects of Thirteen Gossypium barbadense L. Chromosome Substitution Lines in Topcrosses with Upland Cotton Cultivars: I. Yield and Yield Components

    Johnie N. Jenkins;Jixiang Wu;Jack C. McCarty;Sukumar Saha

  • Identification of QTL regions and SSR markers associated with resistance to reniform nematode in Gossypium barbadense L. accession GB713

    Osman A. Gutiérrez;Arin F. Robinson;Johnie N. Jenkins;Jack C. McCarty

  • Genetic effects of thirteen Gossypium barbadense L. Chromosome substitution lines in topcrosses with upland cotton cultivars: II. Fiber quality traits

    Johnie N. Jenkins;Jack C. McCarty;Jixiang Wu;Sukumar Saha

  • Growth and Survival of Heliothis virescens (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) on Transgenic Cotton Containing a Truncated Form of the Delta Endotoxin Gene from Bacillus thuringiensis

    Johnie N. Jenkins;W. L. Parrott;J. C. McCarty;F. E. Callahan

  • Use of fiber and fuzz mutants to detect QTL for yield components, seed, and fiber traits of upland cotton

    Chuanfu An;Johnie N. Jenkins;Jixiang Wu;Yufang Guo

  • Resistance of cotton with δ-endotoxin genes from Bacillus thuringiensis var. kurstaki on selected lepidopteran insects

    Johnie N. Jenkins;Jack C. McCarty;Robert E. Buehler;Jack Kiser

  • Cotton Resistance to Root-Knot Nematode: I. Penetration and Reproduction

    R. G. Creech;J. N. Jenkins;B. Tang;G. W. Lawrence

  • GWAS reveals consistent QTL for drought and salt tolerance in a MAGIC population of 550 lines derived from intermating of 11 Upland cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum ) parents

    Abdelraheem Abdelraheem;Gregory N Thyssen;David D Fang;Johnie N Jenkins

  • Status of the USA cotton germplasm collection and crop vulnerability

    T. P. Wallace;D. Bowman;B. T. Campbell;P. Chee

  • Registration of RMUP-C5, a Random Mated Population of Upland Cotton Germplasm

    J. N. Jenkins;J. C. McCarty;O. A. Gutierrez;R. W. Hayes

  • Genetic dissection of chromosome substitution lines of cotton to discover novel Gossypium barbadense L. alleles for improvement of agronomic traits.

    Sukumar Saha;Jixiang Wu;Johnie N. Jenkins;Jack C. McCarty

  • The P450 gene CYP749A16 is required for tolerance to the sulfonylurea herbicide trifloxysulfuron sodium in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)

    Gregory N. Thyssen;Marina Naoumkina;Jack C. McCarty;Johnie N. Jenkins

  • Registration of 79 Day-Neutral Primitive Cotton Germplasm Lines

    Jack C. McCarty;Johnie N. Jenkins

  • Genetic Analysis of Primitive Cotton Germplasm Accessions

    J. C. McCarty;J. N. Jenkins;B. Tang;C. E. Watson

  • Genetic analysis of agronomic and fibre traits using four interspecific chromosome substitution lines in cotton

    S. Saha;J. N. Jenkins;J. Wu;J. C. McCarty

  • Chromosome Substitution Lines: Concept, Development and Utilization in the Genetic Improvement of Upland Cotton

    Sukumar Saha;David M. Stelly;Dwaine A. Raska;Jixiang Wu

Frequent Co-Authors

Johnie N. Jenkins
Johnie N. Jenkins Agricultural Research Service
David M. Stelly
David M. Stelly Texas A&M University
Don C. Jones
Don C. Jones Cotton (United States)
Richard G. Percy
Richard G. Percy Agricultural Research Service
Peng W. Chee
Peng W. Chee University of Georgia
Robert L. Nichols
Robert L. Nichols Cotton (United States)
Mauricio Ulloa
Mauricio Ulloa US Department of Agriculture
Zhongqi He
Zhongqi He Agricultural Research Service
Hailin Zhang
Hailin Zhang Oklahoma State University
Nacer Bellaloui
Nacer Bellaloui Agricultural Research Service

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Jack C. McCarty

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles