World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Robert-Paul Juster

Robert-Paul Juster

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 43 7181 6696 486 457 169 9506

Robert-Paul Juster publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Robert-Paul Juster between 2007 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Robert-Paul Juster published across 19 years, from 2007 to 2025, averaging 11.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 34 publications in 2024. 65 of the 223 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2007 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 34. Peak 34 publications in 2024. 2007: 1 publication 2008: 1 publication 2009: 0 publications 2010: 1 publication 2011: 5 publications 2012: 9 publications 2013: 6 publications 2014: 6 publications 2015: 5 publications 2016: 18 publications 2017: 11 publications 2018: 7 publications 2019: 11 publications 2020: 21 publications 2021: 22 publications 2022: 17 publications 2023: 17 publications 2024: 34 publications 2025: 31 publications
2007 2025

223 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Robert-Paul Juster: publications per year, 2007 to 2025
Year Publications
2007 1
2008 1
2009 0
2010 1
2011 5
2012 9
2013 6
2014 6
2015 5
2016 18
2017 11
2018 7
2019 11
2020 21
2021 22
2022 17
2023 17
2024 34
2025 31
Total 223
Download as CSV

Robert-Paul Juster publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert-Paul Juster sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 161–170 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 169 publications — 58th percentile

58% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477 169
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Robert-Paul Juster D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert-Paul Juster sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 42–43 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617 43
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Robert-Paul Juster is affiliated with the University of Montreal in Canada and specializes in research primarily within the fields of Psychology and Medicine. Their work covers various subfields, including Social Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Behavioral Neuroscience, Gender Studies, and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology.

Their research addresses a range of topics, particularly focusing on stress responses and cortisol, LGBTQ health, identity, and policy, gender roles and identity studies, sex and gender in healthcare, tryptophan and brain disorders, child and adolescent psychosocial and emotional development, and evolutionary psychology and human behavior.

Recent publications by Robert-Paul Juster include:

  • Association of Social Support During Adolescence With Depression, Anxiety, and Suicidal Ideation in Young Adults (2020) in JAMA Network Open
  • The energetic cost of allostasis and allostatic load (2022) in Psychoneuroendocrinology
  • Sexual and gender minority health vulnerabilities during the COVID-19 health crisis (2020) in American Journal of Human Biology
  • Adverse childhood experiences and low socioeconomic status with respect to allostatic load in adulthood: A systematic review (2021) in Psychoneuroendocrinology
  • Sex and gender terminology: a glossary for gender-inclusive epidemiology (2022) in Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Robert-Paul Juster include:

  • Philippe Kerr
  • Sonia Lupien
  • L. Zachary DuBois
  • Marie-France Marin
  • Martin Picard

The scientist's publications have appeared commonly in venues such as Psychoneuroendocrinology, Comprehensive Psychoneuroendocrinology, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), JMIR Research Protocols, and Psychosomatic Medicine.

Best Publications

  • Allostatic load biomarkers of chronic stress and impact on health and cognition.

    Robert-Paul Juster;Bruce S. McEwen;Sonia J. Lupien

  • Chronic stress, cognitive functioning and mental health

    Marie-France Marin;Catherine Lord;Julie Andrews;Robert-Paul Juster

  • The effects of chronic stress on the human brain: From neurotoxicity, to vulnerability, to opportunity.

    Sonia J. Lupien;Robert-Paul Juster;Catherine Raymond;Marie-France Marin

  • A transdisciplinary perspective of chronic stress in relation to psychopathology throughout life span development

    Robert-Paul Juster;Gustav Bizik;Martin Picard;Genevieve Arsenault-Lapierre

  • Sexual orientation and disclosure in relation to psychiatric symptoms, diurnal cortisol, and allostatic load.

    Robert-Paul Juster;Nathan Grant Smith;Émilie Ouellet;Shireen Sindi

  • A clinical allostatic load index is associated with burnout symptoms and hypocortisolemic profiles in healthy workers

    Robert-Paul Juster;Robert-Paul Juster;Shireen Sindi;Shireen Sindi;Marie-France Marin;Andrea Perna

  • Association of Social Support During Adolescence With Depression, Anxiety, and Suicidal Ideation in Young Adults

    Sara Scardera;Sara Scardera;Léa C. Perret;Isabelle Ouellet-Morin;Geneviève Gariépy

  • Health risk behaviours and allostatic load: A systematic review.

    Beena Suvarna;Aditya Suvarna;Riana Phillips;Robert-Paul Juster

  • Sex and Gender Roles in Relation to Mental Health and Allostatic Load.

    Robert-Paul Juster;Jens C. Pruessner;Alexandra Bisson Desrochers;Olivier Bourdon

  • Sex hormones adjust "sex-specific" reactive and diurnal cortisol profiles.

    Robert-Paul Juster;Robert-Paul Juster;Catherine Raymond;Alexandra Bisson Desrochers;Alexandra Bisson Desrochers;Olivier Bourdon

  • Sexual orientation modulates endocrine stress reactivity.

    Robert-Paul Juster;Mark L. Hatzenbuehler;Adrianna Mendrek;James G. Pfaus

  • Facebook behaviors associated with diurnal cortisol in adolescents: Is befriending stressful?

    Julie Katia Morin-Major;Marie-France Marin;Nadia Durand;Nathalie Wan

  • Allostatic load associations to acute, 3-year and 6-year prospective depressive symptoms in healthy older adults.

    Robert-Paul Juster;Marie-France Marin;Shireen Sindi;Shireen Sindi;N.P. Vasavan Nair

  • Timing is everything: anticipatory stress dynamics among cortisol and blood pressure reactivity and recovery in healthy adults.

    Robert-Paul Juster;Andrea Perna;Marie-France Marin;Shireen Sindi

  • Sexual and gender minority health vulnerabilities during the COVID-19 health crisis.

    James K Gibb;L Zachary DuBois;Sarah Williams;Luseadra McKerracher

  • Sexual and gender minority sleep: A narrative review and suggestions for future research

    Eliana S. Butler;Eleanor McGlinchey;Eleanor McGlinchey;Robert‐Paul Juster

  • The DeStress for Success Program: effects of a stress education program on cortisol levels and depressive symptomatology in adolescents making the transition to high school.

    S.J. Lupien;I. Ouellet-Morin;L. Trépanier;R.P. Juster

  • Allostatic load and comorbidities: A mitochondrial, epigenetic, and evolutionary perspective.

    Robert-Paul Juster;Jennifer J. Russell;Daniel Almeida;Martin Picard

  • Chronic Physiologic Effects of Stress Among Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual Adults: Results From the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.

    Vickie M. Mays;Robert-Paul Juster;Timothy J. Williamson;Teresa E. Seeman

  • Household crowding is associated with higher allostatic load among the Inuit

    Mylene Riva;Pierrich Plusquellec;Robert-Paul Juster;Elhadji A Laouan-Sidi

  • When we test, do we stress? Impact of the testing environment on cortisol secretion and memory performance in older adults

    Shireen Sindi;Alexandra J. Fiocco;Robert-Paul Juster;Jens Pruessner

  • Effects of manipulating the amount of social-evaluative threat on the cortisol stress response in young healthy men.

    Julie Andrews;Mehereen Wadiwalla;Robert Paul Juster;Catherine Lord

Frequent Co-Authors

Sonia J. Lupien
Sonia J. Lupien University of Montreal
Marie-France Marin
Marie-France Marin University of Quebec at Montreal
Jens C. Pruessner
Jens C. Pruessner University of Konstanz
Bruce S. McEwen
Bruce S. McEwen Rockefeller University
Zoltán Sarnyai
Zoltán Sarnyai James Cook University
Isabelle Ouellet-Morin
Isabelle Ouellet-Morin University of Montreal
James G. Pfaus
James G. Pfaus Charles University
Catherine Lord
Catherine Lord University of California, Los Angeles
Sylvana M. Côté
Sylvana M. Côté University of Montreal
Teresa E. Seeman
Teresa E. Seeman University of California, Los Angeles

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a psychology degree in the USA can open doors to a diverse range of online degrees and specialized career pathways. Many students consider fields that leverage knowledge of psychology, such as speech-language pathology. This rewarding field requires a foundation in psychology, communication sciences, and clinical experience.

Licensing requirements for becoming a Speech-Language Pathologist (SLP) vary widely by state, with each having its own certification standards and educational prerequisites. To better understand the process, review the Ohio speech pathologist certification requirements, which set out the specific coursework and examinations needed. If you’re interested in pursuing this career in a different state, compare the slp requirements in Oklahoma or discover the step-by-step process for how to become a speech language pathologist in Oregon.

Pennsylvania also offers a unique pathway, which can be found by reviewing the slp requirements in Pennsylvania. No matter where you plan to practice, thorough research and accredited online degree programs will help you start a fulfilling career in this growing field.

Best Scientists Citing Robert-Paul Juster

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles