What is he best known for?
The fields of study he is best known for:
- Genetics
- Internal medicine
- Animal science
His main research concerns Animal science, Weaning, Veterinary medicine, Maternal effect and Breed.
Many of his studies involve connections with topics such as Reproduction and Animal science.
The Weaning study combines topics in areas such as Shear stress, Phosphorus, Calcium and Heritability.
His research investigates the connection between Veterinary medicine and topics such as Feces that intersect with issues in Infective larvae, Deworming and Pasture.
His Maternal effect research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Zoology, Genetic correlation, Body weight, Flock and Milk production.
His research in Breed intersects with topics in Haemonchus contortus and Immune system.
His most cited work include:
- The importance of genetic diversity in livestock populations of the future. (249 citations)
- Investigation of the Booroola (FecB) and Inverdale (FecXI) mutations in 21 prolific breeds and strains of sheep sampled in 13 countries (123 citations)
- Techniques for estimation of milk yield in beef cows and relationships of milk yield to calf weight gain and postpartum reproduction (79 citations)
What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?
David R. Notter mainly investigates Animal science, Breed, Weaning, Veterinary medicine and Crossbreed.
His Animal science research incorporates themes from Body weight and Heritability.
His Breed research includes themes of Loin and Pasture.
His research investigates the connection between Weaning and topics such as Calcium that intersect with problems in Phosphorus.
His Veterinary medicine study combines topics in areas such as Feces and Haemonchus contortus.
His Crossbreed research incorporates elements of Texel, Feedlot and Polled Hereford.
He most often published in these fields:
- Animal science (73.68%)
- Breed (30.53%)
- Weaning (28.42%)
What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2015-2021)?
- Animal science (73.68%)
- Feces (10.00%)
- Haemonchus contortus (10.00%)
In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:
David R. Notter mostly deals with Animal science, Feces, Haemonchus contortus, Breed and Veterinary medicine.
His work in Animal science addresses subjects such as Heritability, which are connected to disciplines such as Birth weight.
David R. Notter usually deals with Feces and limits it to topics linked to Anthelmintic and Parasite Egg Count and Lactation.
David R. Notter interconnects Andrology, Immune system and Crossbreed in the investigation of issues within Breed.
His work on Flock as part of general Veterinary medicine study is frequently linked to Genetic variability, therefore connecting diverse disciplines of science.
His work carried out in the field of Weaning brings together such families of science as Katahdin sheep and Domestic sheep reproduction.
Between 2015 and 2021, his most popular works were:
- Early IL‐4 gene expression in abomasum is associated with resistance to Haemonchus contortus in hair and wool sheep breeds (17 citations)
- Genetic parameters for fecal egg counts and their relationship with body weights in Katahdin lambs. (12 citations)
- Resistance to gastrointestinal parasite infection in Djallonké sheep. (12 citations)
In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:
- Genetics
- Internal medicine
- Ecology
His primary scientific interests are in Animal science, Feces, Haemonchus contortus, Genetics and Anthelmintic.
His Animal science study frequently draws connections to other fields, such as Heritability.
The study incorporates disciplines such as Flock and Sire in addition to Heritability.
His studies deal with areas such as Nematode, Levamisole and Deworming as well as Feces.
His Haemonchus contortus research includes elements of Immune system and Immunity.
His study in Anthelmintic is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Pregnancy, Lactation and Domestic sheep reproduction.
This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s
body of work. If you have any feedback, you can
contact us
here.
