World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking National Ranking Publications Citations
Animal Science and Veterinary 34 1858 535 80 4665

G. D. Snowder publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by G. D. Snowder between 1989 and 2011, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. G. D. Snowder published across 23 years, from 1989 to 2011, averaging 3.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 10 publications in 2002. 3 of the 83 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1989 to 2011. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 10. Peak 10 publications in 2002. 1989: 1 publication 1990: 1 publication 1991: 3 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 4 publications 1994: 4 publications 1995: 3 publications 1996: 6 publications 1997: 1 publication 1998: 6 publications 1999: 6 publications 2000: 3 publications 2001: 6 publications 2002: 10 publications 2003: 7 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 8 publications 2006: 4 publications 2007: 1 publication 2008: 1 publication 2009: 2 publications 2010: 0 publications 2011: 3 publications
1989 2011

83 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
G. D. Snowder: publications per year, 1989 to 2011
Year Publications
1989 1
1990 1
1991 3
1992 0
1993 4
1994 4
1995 3
1996 6
1997 1
1998 6
1999 6
2000 3
2001 6
2002 10
2003 7
2004 3
2005 8
2006 4
2007 1
2008 1
2009 2
2010 0
2011 3
Total 83
Download as CSV

G. D. Snowder publication distribution in Animal Science and Veterinary in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Animal Science and Veterinary in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where G. D. Snowder sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100
Bar chart with 84 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 29–33 to 442+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 109. Most scientists, 109, have 119–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 442 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 79–83 publications, is where this scientist sits. 29–33 publications: 1 scientist 34–38 publications: 6 scientists 39–43 publications: 17 scientists 44–48 publications: 23 scientists 49–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–58 publications: 44 scientists 59–63 publications: 66 scientists 64–68 publications: 75 scientists 69–73 publications: 71 scientists 74–78 publications: 85 scientists 79–83 publications: 108 scientists 84–88 publications: 105 scientists 89–93 publications: 84 scientists 94–98 publications: 103 scientists 99–103 publications: 97 scientists 104–108 publications: 95 scientists 109–113 publications: 89 scientists 114–118 publications: 88 scientists 119–123 publications: 109 scientists 124–128 publications: 93 scientists 129–133 publications: 89 scientists 134–138 publications: 95 scientists 139–143 publications: 92 scientists 144–148 publications: 80 scientists 149–153 publications: 75 scientists 154–158 publications: 74 scientists 159–163 publications: 67 scientists 164–168 publications: 53 scientists 169–173 publications: 62 scientists 174–178 publications: 63 scientists 179–183 publications: 50 scientists 184–188 publications: 55 scientists 189–193 publications: 50 scientists 194–198 publications: 27 scientists 199–203 publications: 44 scientists 204–208 publications: 31 scientists 209–213 publications: 28 scientists 214–218 publications: 38 scientists 219–223 publications: 33 scientists 224–228 publications: 36 scientists 229–233 publications: 29 scientists 234–238 publications: 35 scientists 239–243 publications: 23 scientists 244–248 publications: 24 scientists 249–253 publications: 29 scientists 254–258 publications: 28 scientists 259–263 publications: 21 scientists 264–268 publications: 25 scientists 269–273 publications: 11 scientists 274–278 publications: 18 scientists 279–283 publications: 13 scientists 284–288 publications: 18 scientists 289–293 publications: 10 scientists 294–298 publications: 12 scientists 299–303 publications: 11 scientists 304–308 publications: 15 scientists 309–313 publications: 14 scientists 314–318 publications: 14 scientists 319–323 publications: 8 scientists 324–328 publications: 8 scientists 329–333 publications: 13 scientists 334–338 publications: 14 scientists 339–343 publications: 13 scientists 344–348 publications: 10 scientists 349–353 publications: 11 scientists 354–358 publications: 5 scientists 359–363 publications: 8 scientists 364–368 publications: 8 scientists 369–373 publications: 6 scientists 374–378 publications: 7 scientists 379–383 publications: 8 scientists 384–388 publications: 3 scientists 389–393 publications: 4 scientists 394–398 publications: 5 scientists 399–403 publications: 8 scientists 404–408 publications: 5 scientists 409–413 publications: 4 scientists 414–418 publications: 3 scientists 419–423 publications: 8 scientists 424–428 publications: 5 scientists 429–433 publications: 3 scientists 434–438 publications: 5 scientists 439–441 publications: 5 scientists 442+ publications: 99 scientists
29–33 publications 442+

This scientist: 80 publications — 15th percentile

15% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 442 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Animal Science and Veterinary scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,155 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
29–33 1
34–38 6
39–43 17
44–48 23
49–53 28
54–58 44
59–63 66
64–68 75
69–73 71
74–78 85
79–83 108 80
84–88 105
89–93 84
94–98 103
99–103 97
104–108 95
109–113 89
114–118 88
119–123 109
124–128 93
129–133 89
134–138 95
139–143 92
144–148 80
149–153 75
154–158 74
159–163 67
164–168 53
169–173 62
174–178 63
179–183 50
184–188 55
189–193 50
194–198 27
199–203 44
204–208 31
209–213 28
214–218 38
219–223 33
224–228 36
229–233 29
234–238 35
239–243 23
244–248 24
249–253 29
254–258 28
259–263 21
264–268 25
269–273 11
274–278 18
279–283 13
284–288 18
289–293 10
294–298 12
299–303 11
304–308 15
309–313 14
314–318 14
319–323 8
324–328 8
329–333 13
334–338 14
339–343 13
344–348 10
349–353 11
354–358 5
359–363 8
364–368 8
369–373 6
374–378 7
379–383 8
384–388 3
389–393 4
394–398 5
399–403 8
404–408 5
409–413 4
414–418 3
419–423 8
424–428 5
429–433 3
434–438 5
439–441 5
442+ 99
Download as CSV

G. D. Snowder D-index placement in Animal Science and Veterinary in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Animal Science and Veterinary scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where G. D. Snowder sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 20 to 77+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 158. Most scientists, 158, have 31 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 77 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 34 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 20 D-Index: 5 scientists 21 D-Index: 22 scientists 22 D-Index: 31 scientists 23 D-Index: 44 scientists 24 D-Index: 53 scientists 25 D-Index: 66 scientists 26 D-Index: 80 scientists 27 D-Index: 101 scientists 28 D-Index: 106 scientists 29 D-Index: 116 scientists 30 D-Index: 154 scientists 31 D-Index: 158 scientists 32 D-Index: 143 scientists 33 D-Index: 137 scientists 34 D-Index: 126 scientists 35 D-Index: 134 scientists 36 D-Index: 112 scientists 37 D-Index: 115 scientists 38 D-Index: 105 scientists 39 D-Index: 111 scientists 40 D-Index: 107 scientists 41 D-Index: 87 scientists 42 D-Index: 74 scientists 43 D-Index: 62 scientists 44 D-Index: 61 scientists 45 D-Index: 41 scientists 46 D-Index: 51 scientists 47 D-Index: 43 scientists 48 D-Index: 28 scientists 49 D-Index: 47 scientists 50 D-Index: 40 scientists 51 D-Index: 34 scientists 52 D-Index: 33 scientists 53 D-Index: 43 scientists 54 D-Index: 16 scientists 55 D-Index: 32 scientists 56 D-Index: 21 scientists 57 D-Index: 18 scientists 58 D-Index: 28 scientists 59 D-Index: 33 scientists 60 D-Index: 17 scientists 61 D-Index: 21 scientists 62 D-Index: 18 scientists 63 D-Index: 21 scientists 64 D-Index: 9 scientists 65 D-Index: 20 scientists 66 D-Index: 11 scientists 67 D-Index: 16 scientists 68 D-Index: 12 scientists 69 D-Index: 17 scientists 70 D-Index: 13 scientists 71 D-Index: 15 scientists 72 D-Index: 11 scientists 73 D-Index: 11 scientists 74 D-Index: 14 scientists 75 D-Index: 5 scientists 76 D-Index: 6 scientists 77+ D-Index: 100 scientists
20 D-Index 77+

This scientist: 34 D-Index — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 77 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Animal Science and Veterinary scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,155 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
20 5
21 22
22 31
23 44
24 53
25 66
26 80
27 101
28 106
29 116
30 154
31 158
32 143
33 137
34 126 34
35 134
36 112
37 115
38 105
39 111
40 107
41 87
42 74
43 62
44 61
45 41
46 51
47 43
48 28
49 47
50 40
51 34
52 33
53 43
54 16
55 32
56 21
57 18
58 28
59 33
60 17
61 21
62 18
63 21
64 9
65 20
66 11
67 16
68 12
69 17
70 13
71 15
72 11
73 11
74 14
75 5
76 6
77+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

G. D. Snowder is affiliated with the Agricultural Research Service in the United States. Their professional focus is rooted within this government agency, which conducts research on agriculture and related biological sciences.

No detailed publications or papers are recorded for this researcher in the available data. Likewise, there is no listed information on frequent co-authors, publication venues, or book publications that would provide insight into collaborative patterns or contributions to monographs and edited volumes.

The absence of identified main fields and subfields of study, as well as a lack of specified main topics of work, indicates that the publicly available records do not include information about specific subject areas or thematic research focuses connected to Snowder.

There are no awards or honors documented for this researcher in the current dataset. The status of the scientist is active, as there is no indication that they are deceased.

Given these parameters, they are currently recognized primarily through their institutional affiliation without further publicly available data detailing research outputs or scholarly impact in the form of citations or academic distinctions.

Best Publications

  • Bovine respiratory disease in feedlot cattle: environmental, genetic, and economic factors.

    G. D. Snowder;L. D. Van Vleck;L. V. Cundiff;G. L. Bennett

  • Polar Overdominance at the Ovine callipyge Locus

    Noelle E. Cockett;Sam P. Jackson;Tracy L. Shay;Frédéric Farnir

  • Estimates of genetic parameters and genetic change for reproduction, weight, and wool characteristics of Targhee sheep.

    K. J. Hanford;L. D. Van Vleck;G. D. Snowder

  • Influence of breed, number of suckling lambs, and stage of lactation on ewe milk production and lamb growth under range conditions.

    G. D. Snowder;H. A. Glimp

  • Histology and composition of muscles from normal and callipyge lambs

    Charles E. Carpenter;Owen D. Rice;Noelle E. Cockett;Gary D. Snowder

  • Influence of breed, heterozygosity, and disease incidence on estimates of variance components of respiratory disease in preweaned beef calves

    G. D. Snowder;L. D. Van Vleck;L. V. Cundiff;G. L. Bennett

  • GENETIC PARAMETERS AMONG WEIGHT, PROLIFICACY AND WOOL TRAITS OF COLUMBIA, POLYPAY, RAMBOUILLET AND TARGHEE SHEEP

    C M Bromley;G D Snowder;L D Van Vleck

  • Bovine respiratory disease in feedlot cattle: phenotypic, environmental, and genetic correlations with growth, carcass, and longissimus muscle palatability traits.

    G. D. Snowder;L. D. Van Vleck;L. V. Cundiff;G. L. Bennett

  • Estimates of genetic parameters and selection strategies to improve the economic efficiency of postweaning growth in lambs.

    G. D. Snowder;L. D. Van Vleck

  • Genetic and environmental factors associated with incidence of infectious bovine keratoconjunctivitis in preweaned beef calves

    G. D. Snowder;L. D. Van Vleck;L. V. Cundiff;G. L. Bennett

  • Evaluation of the South African Dorper as a terminal sire breed for growth, carcass, and palatability characteristics

    G. D. Snowder;S. K. Duckett

  • Effect of the callipyge gene on muscle growth, calpastatin activity, and tenderness of three muscles across the growth curve.

    S K Duckett;G D Snowder;N E Cockett

  • Estimates of genetic parameters and genetic trend for reproduction, weight, and wool characteristics of Polypay sheep

    K.J. Hanford;L.D. Van Vleck;G.D. Snowder

  • Effect of freezing on calpastatin activity and tenderness of callipyge lamb.

    S K Duckett;T A Klein;R K Leckie;J H Thorngate

  • Genetic correlations for litter weight weaned with growth, prolificacy, and wool traits in Columbia, Polypay, Rambouillet, and Targhee sheep.

    C M Bromley;L D Van Vleck;G D Snowder

  • Estimates of genetic parameters and genetic change for reproduction, weight, and wool characteristics of Rambouillet sheep☆

    K.J. Hanford;L.D. Van Vleck;G.D. Snowder

  • Tenderness of normal and callipyge lamb aged fresh or after freezing(

    S.K. Duckett;T.A. Klein;M.V. Dodson;G.D. Snowder

  • The callipyge mutation and other genes that affect muscle hypertrophy in sheep

    Noelle E Cockett;Maria A Smit;Christopher A Bidwell;Karin Segers

  • Production by ewes rearing single or twin lambs: effects of dietary crude protein percentage and supplemental zinc methionine.

    P G Hatfield;G D Snowder;W A Head;H A Glimp

  • Composite trait selection to improve reproduction and ewe productivity: a review

    G. D. Snowder;N. M. Fogarty

  • Current concepts in the epizootiology, diagnosis, and economic importance of ovine progressive pneumonia in North America: A review

    Scott J. Brodie;Andres de la Concha-Bermejillo;Gary D. Snowder;James C. DeMartini

  • Carcass characteristics and optimal slaughter weights in four breeds of sheep.

    G D Snowder;H A Glimp;R A Field

  • Levels of ovine herpesvirus 2 DNA in nasal secretions and blood of sheep: implications for transmission

    Hong Li;Yuping Hua;Yuping Hua;Gary Snowder;Timothy B. Crawford

  • Maternal Factors Associated with Prenatal Transmission of Ovine Lentivirus

    S. J. Brodie;A. de la Concha-Bermejillo;G. Koenig;G. D. Snowder

  • Influence of body weight, age, and weight gain on fertility and prolificacy in four breeds of ewe lambs.

    C. T. Gaskins;G. D. Snowder;M. K. Westman;M. Evans

Frequent Co-Authors

L.D. Van Vleck
L.D. Van Vleck United States Department of Agriculture
Larry V. Cundiff
Larry V. Cundiff Agricultural Research Service
Gary L. Bennett
Gary L. Bennett Agricultural Research Service
Michel Georges
Michel Georges University of Liège
Susan K. Duckett
Susan K. Duckett Clemson University
Steven D. Shackelford
Steven D. Shackelford Agricultural Research Service
Charles T. Gaskins
Charles T. Gaskins Washington State University
Eduardo Casas
Eduardo Casas Agricultural Research Service
Carole Charlier
Carole Charlier University of Liège
Mohammad Koohmaraie
Mohammad Koohmaraie IEH Laboratories and Consulting Group

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Animal Science and Veterinary opens doors to a variety of related online degrees that can enhance your career options. For example, exploring athletic director education requirements provides insight into leadership roles in sports management, which often intersect with animal performance and rehabilitation fields.

If you are interested in health and fitness from a biological perspective, consider exercise science degrees online. These programs offer flexibility and focus on the science behind physical activity, applicable to animal physiology and wellness careers.

Another growing field is behavior analysis, where bcba programs train professionals to provide behavioral therapy services. This knowledge can be valuable for veterinary behaviorists or animal trainers.

For those interested in education and developmental sciences, online school psychology programs offer pathways to careers that support learning and development, which can also be relevant in animal-assisted therapy and educational outreach related to animal science.

Best Scientists Citing G. D. Snowder

Recently Published Articles