World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
61
Citations
24255
World Ranking
3305
National Ranking
1863

Judith T. Moskowitz publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Judith T. Moskowitz sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 165 publications — 56th percentile

56% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Judith T. Moskowitz D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Judith T. Moskowitz sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 61 D-Index — 71st percentile

71% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Judith T. Moskowitz is affiliated with Northwestern University in the United States. Their research spans multiple fields, with a primary focus on Psychology and Medicine. Within these fields, their work concentrates notably on Clinical Psychology, General Health Professions, Social Psychology, Applied Psychology, and Infectious Diseases.

The scientist's research encompasses a range of topics related to mental health, psychological well-being, and health interventions. The main topics investigated include:

  • COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
  • Optimism, Hope, and Well-being
  • HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
  • Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Healthcare professionals' stress and burnout
  • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development

Judith T. Moskowitz has published extensively, with recent papers covering various aspects of psychological science and well-being. Notable recent publications include:

  • "Positive psychology in a pandemic: buffering, bolstering, and building mental health," 2021, The Journal of Positive Psychology
  • "The relationship between emotion regulation and well-being in patients with mental disorders: A meta-analysis," 2020, Comprehensive Psychiatry
  • "The Future of Women in Psychological Science," 2020, Perspectives on Psychological Science
  • "Evaluating the Association of Multiple Burnout Definitions and Thresholds With Prevalence and Outcomes," 2020, JAMA Surgery
  • "Interventions to Modify Psychological Well-Being: Progress, Promises, and an Agenda for Future Research," 2023, Affective Science

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Judith T. Moskowitz include Elizabeth L. Addington, Elaine O. Cheung, Adam W. Carrico, Lisa R. Hirschhorn, and Melanie E. Freedman. These collaborations have contributed to a significant portion of their scholarly output.

The scientist's work has appeared repeatedly in several publication venues. Most frequent among these are:

  • Affective Science
  • JMIR Research Protocols
  • PLoS ONE
  • AIDS and Behavior
  • Journal of Medical Internet Research

Best Publications

  • Coping: Pitfalls and Promise

    Susan Folkman;Judith Tedlie Moskowitz

  • Positive affect and the other side of coping.

    Susan Folkman;Judith Tedlie Moskowitz

  • Stress, Positive Emotion, and Coping

    Susan Folkman;Judith Tedlie Moskowitz

  • Can meditation slow rate of cellular aging? Cognitive stress, mindfulness, and telomeres

    Elissa Epel;Jennifer Daubenmier;Judith Tedlie Moskowitz;Susan Folkman

  • Resilience to Loss in Bereaved Spouses, Bereaved Parents, and Bereaved Gay Men

    George A. Bonanno;Judith Tedlie Moskowitz;Anthony Papa;Susan Folkman

  • Suicide Attempts Among Gay and Bisexual Men: Lifetime Prevalence and Antecedents

    Jay P. Paul;Joseph Catania;Lance M. Pollack;Judith Moskowitz

  • Self-report Mindfulness as a Mediator of Psychological Well-being in a Stress Reduction Intervention for Cancer Patients—A Randomized Study

    Richard Bränström;Pia Kvillemo;Yvonne Brandberg;Judith Tedlie Moskowitz

  • Positive affect predicts lower risk of AIDS mortality.

    Judith Tedlie Moskowitz

  • Distress and depression in men who have sex with men: the Urban Men's Health Study.

    Thomas C. Mills;Jay Paul;Ron Stall;Lance M. Pollack

  • Positive Affect and Health: What Do We Know and Where Next Should We Go?

    Sarah D. Pressman;Brooke N. Jenkins;Judith T. Moskowitz

  • Coping and mood during aids-related caregiving and bereavement

    Judith Tedlie Moskowitz;Susan Folkman;Linda Collette;Eric Vittinghoff

  • The association between dispositional mindfulness, psychological well-being, and perceived health in a Swedish population-based sample

    Richard Bränström;Larissa G. Duncan;Judith Tedlie Moskowitz

  • Coping and physical health during caregiving: the roles of positive and negative affect.

    Douglas W. Billings;Susan Folkman;Michael Acree;Judith Tedlie Moskowitz

  • What Works in Coping With HIV? A Meta-Analysis With Implications for Coping With Serious Illness

    Judith Tedlie Moskowitz;Jen R. Hult;Cori Bussolari;Michael Acree

  • Positive psychology in a pandemic: buffering, bolstering, and building mental health

    Lea Waters;Sara B. Algoe;Jane Dutton;Robert Emmons

  • An Online Intervention Comparing a Very Low-Carbohydrate Ketogenic Diet and Lifestyle Recommendations Versus a Plate Method Diet in Overweight Individuals With Type 2 Diabetes: A Randomized Controlled Trial

    Laura R Saslow;Ashley E Mason;Sarah Kim;Veronica Goldman

  • Twelve-month outcomes of a randomized trial of a moderate-carbohydrate versus very low-carbohydrate diet in overweight adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus or prediabetes

    Laura R. Saslow;Jennifer J. Daubenmier;Judith T. Moskowitz;Sarah Kim

  • Psychological Well-Being and Physical Health: Associations, Mechanisms, and Future Directions:

    Rosalba Hernandez;Rosalba Hernandez;Sarah M. Bassett;Seth W. Boughton;Stephanie A. Schuette

  • A randomized pilot trial of a moderate carbohydrate diet compared to a very low carbohydrate diet in overweight or obese individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus or prediabetes.

    Laura R. Saslow;Sarah Kim;Jennifer J. Daubenmier;Judith T. Moskowitz

  • Positive affect uniquely predicts lower risk of mortality in people with diabetes.

    Judith Tedlie Moskowitz;Elissa S Epel;Michael Acree

  • Randomized controlled trial of a positive affect intervention for people newly diagnosed with HIV.

    Judith T. Moskowitz;Adam W. Carrico;Larissa G. Duncan;Michael A. Cohn

Frequent Co-Authors

Adam W. Carrico
Adam W. Carrico University of Miami
Susan Folkman
Susan Folkman University of California, San Francisco
Torsten B. Neilands
Torsten B. Neilands University of California, San Francisco
Elissa S. Epel
Elissa S. Epel University of California, San Francisco
Frederick Hecht
Frederick Hecht University of California, San Francisco
Joseph A. Catania
Joseph A. Catania Oregon State University
Leslie Wilson
Leslie Wilson University of California, San Francisco
Lance M. Pollack
Lance M. Pollack University of California, San Francisco
Ron Stall
Ron Stall University of Pittsburgh
Mallory O. Johnson
Mallory O. Johnson University of California, San Francisco

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Psychology in the USA opens up a wide range of online degree options and career routes. Many students are interested in specialized fields such as what jobs are in criminal psychology. These positions combine knowledge of human behavior with the justice system, leading to roles in law enforcement, corrections, and forensic analysis.

If you’re considering graduate study, it’s important to know the masters in social work vs counseling distinction. This can help you decide between focusing on clinical counseling, therapy, or broader community-based social work roles.

Prospective students looking for accessible programs might explore easy psychology programs to get into, which offer flexible entry requirements for those new to the field. This is especially helpful for career changers or those balancing work and study.

For those eager to advance quickly, accelerated master’s program psychology options allow students to complete graduate degrees in a much shorter time frame, helping you enter the workforce or advance your career faster.

Best Scientists Citing Judith T. Moskowitz

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles