World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
51
Citations
12647
World Ranking
16999
National Ranking
7008

Mark Gomelsky publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark Gomelsky sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 105 publications — 7th percentile

7% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Mark Gomelsky D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark Gomelsky sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 51 D-Index — 14th percentile

14% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2017 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Overview

Mark Gomelsky is affiliated with the University of Wyoming in the United States and has a research profile centered on biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology, with additional focus on agricultural and biological sciences. Their work spans various subfields such as biotechnology, molecular biology, plant science, food science, and genetics.

The scientist's research addresses several topics, including:

  • Listeria monocytogenes in Food Safety
  • Essential Oils and Antimicrobial Activity
  • Plant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity
  • Bacterial biofilms and quorum sensing
  • Microbial Metabolism and Applications
  • Viral Infectious Diseases and Gene Expression in Insects
  • Plant Pathogenic Bacteria Studies

Mark Gomelsky has published multiple papers across various venues, with a number of works appearing in Frontiers in Microbiology, Environmental Microbiology, Molecular Plant Pathology, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), and ACS Synthetic Biology. Notable recent publications include:

  • Antifungal weapons of Lysobacter, a mighty biocontrol agent, 2021, Environmental Microbiology
  • Coordinated control of the type IV pili and c-di-GMP-dependent antifungal antibiotic production in Lysobacter by the response regulator PilR, 2021, Molecular Plant Pathology
  • The Listeria monocytogenes exopolysaccharide significantly enhances colonization and survival on fresh produce, 2023, Frontiers in Microbiology
  • Lignan-containing maple products inhibit Listeria monocytogenes biofilms on fresh produce, 2023, Frontiers in Microbiology
  • Maple compounds prevent biofilm formation in Listeria monocytogenes via sortase inhibition, 2024, Frontiers in Microbiology

The scientist regularly collaborates with researchers such as Ahmed M. Elbakush, Kangwen Xu, Danyu Shen, Shan-Ho Chou, and Guoliang Qian, with four coauthored papers with Elbakush and multiple collaborations with others.

Mark Gomelsky was recognized as a Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in 2017.

Best Publications

  • Cyclic di-GMP: the First 25 Years of a Universal Bacterial Second Messenger

    Ute Römling;Michael Y. Galperin;Mark Gomelsky

  • C-di-GMP: the dawning of a novel bacterial signalling system

    Ute Römling;Mark Gomelsky;Michael Y. Galperin

  • The ubiquitous protein domain EAL is a cyclic diguanylate-specific phosphodiesterase: enzymatically active and inactive EAL domains.

    Andrew J. Schmidt;Dmitri A. Ryjenkov;Mark Gomelsky

  • Cyclic Diguanylate Is a Ubiquitous Signaling Molecule in Bacteria: Insights into Biochemistry of the GGDEF Protein Domain

    Dmitri A. Ryjenkov;Marina Tarutina;Oleg V. Moskvin;Mark Gomelsky

  • The PilZ domain is a receptor for the second messenger c-di-GMP: the PilZ domain protein YcgR controls motility in enterobacteria.

    Dmitri A. Ryjenkov;Roger Simm;Ute Römling;Mark Gomelsky

  • BLUF: a novel FAD-binding domain involved in sensory transduction in microorganisms.

    Mark Gomelsky;Gabriele Klug

  • Structure and mechanism of a bacterial light-regulated cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterase.

    Thomas R. M. Barends;Elisabeth Hartmann;Julia J. Griese;Thorsten Beitlich

  • Natural and engineered photoactivated nucleotidyl cyclases for optogenetic applications.

    Min-Hyung Ryu;Oleg V. Moskvin;Jessica Siltberg-Liberles;Mark Gomelsky

  • A post-translational, c-di-GMP-dependent mechanism regulating flagellar motility.

    Xin Fang;Mark Gomelsky

  • An unorthodox bacteriophytochrome from Rhodobacter sphaeroides involved in turnover of the second messenger c-di-GMP

    Marina Tarutina;Dmitri A. Ryjenkov;Mark Gomelsky

  • Structure of a bacterial BLUF photoreceptor: insights into blue light-mediated signal transduction

    Astrid Jung;Tatjana Domratcheva;Marina Tarutina;Qiong Wu

  • cAMP, c-di-GMP, c-di-AMP and now cGMP: bacteria use them all!

    Mark Gomelsky

  • A single flavoprotein, AppA, integrates both redox and light signals in Rhodobacter sphaeroides.

    Stephan Braatsch;Mark Gomelsky;Silke Kuphal;Gabriele Klug

  • Systematic analysis of cyclic di-GMP signalling enzymes and their role in biofilm formation and virulence in Yersinia pestis

    Alexander G. Bobrov;Olga Kirillina;Dmitri A. Ryjenkov;Christopher M. Waters

  • Light helps bacteria make important lifestyle decisions

    Mark Gomelsky;Wouter D. Hoff

  • Overexpression of aldehyde dehydrogenase-2 (ALDH2) transgene prevents acetaldehyde-induced cell injury in human umbilical vein endothelial cells: role of ERK and p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase.

    Shi-Yan Li;Mark Gomelsky;Jinhong Duan;Zhaojie Zhang

  • AppA, a Redox Regulator of Photosystem Formation in Rhodobacter sphaeroides 2.4.1, Is a Flavoprotein IDENTIFICATION OF A NOVEL FAD BINDING DOMAIN

    Mark Gomelsky;Samuel Kaplan

  • Control of Photosystem Formation in Rhodobacter sphaeroides

    Jill Zeilstra-Ryalls;Mark Gomelsky;Jesus M. Eraso;Alexei Yeliseev

  • GIL, a new c-di-GMP-binding protein domain involved in regulation of cellulose synthesis in enterobacteria.

    Xin Fang;Irfan Ahmad;Andrea Blanka;Marco Schottkowski

  • Cyclic di-GMP is Essential for the Survival of the Lyme Disease Spirochete in Ticks

    Ming He;Zhiming Ouyang;Bryan Troxell;Haijun Xu;Haijun Xu

Frequent Co-Authors

Samuel Kaplan
Samuel Kaplan The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
Ute Römling
Ute Römling Karolinska Institute
Michael Y. Galperin
Michael Y. Galperin National Institutes of Health
Gabriele Klug
Gabriele Klug University of Giessen
James P. O'Gara
James P. O'Gara University of Galway
Alastair G. McEwan
Alastair G. McEwan University of Queensland
Jorma Hinkula
Jorma Hinkula Linköping University
Thomas Bjarnsholt
Thomas Bjarnsholt University of Copenhagen
Ilme Schlichting
Ilme Schlichting Max Planck Society

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Biology or Biochemistry in the USA opens up versatile career options, not only in research but also in the health and medical sectors. Many students choose to launch their healthcare career with medical assistant classes online with financial aid, offering a cost-effective and flexible entry into the medical field.

As you progress, transitioning from a certified medical assistant to a licensed practical nurse is possible through programs like the cma to lpn pathway. This helps expand your responsibilities and earning potential in healthcare.

For those interested in a broader science background, online biology degrees offer accelerated pathways to research, laboratory work, or advanced studies in medicine and allied health sciences.

If nursing is your chosen path, accredited online nursing programs allow you to balance studies with other commitments while preparing for licensure and clinical roles.

Each of these online degree options is ideal for students seeking flexibility, financial support, and strong career prospects in the life sciences.

Best Scientists Citing Mark Gomelsky

Trending Scientists