World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
35
Citations
5491
World Ranking
6727
National Ranking
478

Gillian M. Boulton-Lewis publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gillian M. Boulton-Lewis sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 143 publications — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Gillian M. Boulton-Lewis D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gillian M. Boulton-Lewis sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

Gillian M. Boulton-Lewis is affiliated with the Queensland University of Technology in Australia. Their research profile does not list specific recent papers or frequent co-authors, but the academic affiliation provides context for their institutional base and potential research environment.

There is no data available regarding frequent publication venues or main fields and subfields of study. Similarly, information on main topics of work and book publications is not detailed in the provided data.

No awards or honors have been recorded for Gillian M. Boulton-Lewis in the available information.

Given the data, the scientist's professional record is characterized primarily by their association with a significant Australian university, although specific research outputs and collaborations remain unspecified in this profile.

Best Publications

  • Changing epistemological beliefs in pre-service teacher education students

    Joanne Brownlee;Nola Purdie;Gillian Boulton-Lewis

  • Students' conceptions of learning, the classroom environment, and approaches to learning

    Barry C. Dart;Paul C. Burnett;Nola M. Purdie;Gillian M. Boulton-Lewis

  • Secondary teachers' conceptions of teaching and learning

    Gillian M. Boulton-Lewis;David J. Smith;Andrea R. McCrindle;Paul Burnett

  • Learning and Active Aging

    Gillian Boulton-Lewis;Laurie Buys;Janette Lovie-Kitchin

  • Education and Learning for the Elderly: Why, How, What

    Gillian M. Boulton-Lewis

  • THE LEARNING NEEDS OF OLDER ADULTS

    Nola Purdie;Gillian Boulton-Lewis

  • Students' Perceptions of Teaching and Learning: the influence of students' approaches to learning and teachers' approaches to teaching

    Jennifer Campbell;David Smith;Gillian M. Boulton-Lewis;Joanne M. Brownlee

  • Classroom Learning Environments and Students' Approaches to Learning.

    Barry C. Dart;Paul C. Burnett;Gillian M. Boulton-Lewis;Jenny Campbell

  • Issues of active ageing: Perceptions of older people with lifelong intellectual disability

    Laurie Buys;Gillian Boulton-Lewis;Jan Tedman-Jones;Helen Edwards

  • Ageing, Learning, and Computer Technology in Australia

    Gillian M. Boulton-Lewis;Laurie Buys;Jan Lovie-Kitchin;Karen Barnett

  • Core beliefs about knowing and peripheral beliefs about learning: Developing an holistic conceptualisation of epistemological beliefs

    Joanne M. Brownlee;Gillian M. Boulton-Lewis;Nola M. Purdie

  • Change in knowledge of learning and teaching through journal writing

    Barry C. Dart;Gillian M. Boulton-Lewis;Joanne M. Brownlee;Andrea R. McCrindle

  • Hospice patients' views on research in palliative care

    Wendy Terry;Les Olson;Peter Ravenscroft;Lynn Wilss

  • Positive self-identity for indigenous students and its relationship to school outcomes.

    Nola Purdie;G Boulton-Lewis;J Fanshawe;P Tripcony

  • Tertiary Students' Knowledge of Their Own Learning and a SOLO Taxonomy.

    Gillian Boulton-Lewis

  • Learning in Formal and Informal Contexts: Conceptions and Strategies of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander University Students.

    Gillian M Boulton-Lewis;Ference Marton;David C Lewis;Lynn A Wilss

  • The SOLO Taxonomy as a Means of Shaping and Assessing Learning in Higher Education

    Gillian M. Boulton-Lewis

  • A Longitudinal Study of Learning for a Group of Indigenous Australian University Students: Dissonant Conceptions and Strategies.

    Gillian M. Boulton-Lewis;Ference Marton;David C. Lewis;Lynn A. Wilss

  • Practices for teaching moral values in the early years: A call for a pedagogy of participation

    Eva Johansson;Joanne Brownlee;Charlotte Cobb-Moore;Gillian Boulton-Lewis

  • An analysis of young children's strategies and use of devices for length measurement☆

    Gillian M. Boulton-Lewis;Lynn A. Wilss;Sue L. Mutch

  • Teaching and learning in higher education

    Barry C.< Dart;Gillian M. < Boulton-Lewis

  • Higher Education and Working Life: Collaborations, Confrontations and Challenges

    Päivi Tynjälä;Jussi Välimaa;Gillian Boulton-Lewis

Frequent Co-Authors

Joanne M. Brownlee
Joanne M. Brownlee Queensland University of Technology
Laurie Buys
Laurie Buys Queensland University of Technology
Eva Johansson
Eva Johansson Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences
Ference Marton
Ference Marton University of Gothenburg
Paul C. Burnett
Paul C. Burnett Queensland University of Technology
Graeme S. Halford
Graeme S. Halford Griffith University
Päivi Tynjälä
Päivi Tynjälä University of Jyväskylä
Colin Lankshear
Colin Lankshear James Cook University
Christine Bigby
Christine Bigby La Trobe University
Lyn D. English
Lyn D. English Queensland University of Technology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing Social Sciences and Humanities degrees online can offer maximum flexibility, cost-effectiveness, and a clear path to impactful careers. Many students explore options like social work, applied behavior analysis, or psychology, fields that provide rewarding jobs in education, healthcare, and community support.

For those interested in social work, there are a range of cheapest msw programs online that allow graduates to gain vital skills and credentials without a heavy financial burden. Fast-tracking your education is also possible with the fastest msw program options available, helping you enter the workforce sooner.

If your goal is to become a Board Certified Behavior Analyst, consider bcba certification online. These programs are structured for affordability and flexibility, making them accessible to working professionals.

For those drawn to psychology, accelerated psychology programs online can help you complete your degree more quickly, enabling you to advance toward licensure or graduate study without delay.

Exploring these options can help tailor your academic path to your career ambitions—while saving time and money.

Best Scientists Citing Gillian M. Boulton-Lewis

Trending Scientists