World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
39
Citations
8876
World Ranking
5562
National Ranking
13

Jyh Chong Liang publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jyh Chong Liang sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 132 publications — 32nd percentile

32% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Jyh Chong Liang D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jyh Chong Liang sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Current status, opportunities and challenges of augmented reality in education

    Hsin-Kai Wu;Silvia Wen-Yu Lee;Hsin-Yi Chang;Jyh-Chong Liang

  • A review of using eye-tracking technology in exploring learning from 2000 to 2012

    Meng Lung Lai;Meng Jung Tsai;Fang Ying Yang;Chung Yuan Hsu

  • Health Information Obtained From the Internet and Changes in Medical Decision Making: Questionnaire Development and Cross-Sectional Survey

    Yen Yuan Chen;Chia Ming Li;Jyh Chong Liang;Chin Chung Tsai

  • Scientific epistemic beliefs, conceptions of learning science and self-efficacy of learning science among high school students

    Chin-Chung Tsai;Hsin Ning Jessie Ho;Jyh Chong Liang;Hung Ming Lin

  • Examining the role of feedback messages in undergraduate students' writing performance during an online peer assessment activity

    Kun Hung Cheng;Jyh Chong Liang;Chin Chung Tsai

  • Effects of Learning Physics Using Augmented Reality on Students' Self-Efficacy and Conceptions of Learning.

    Su Cai;Changhao Liu;Tao Wang;Enrui Liu

  • The relationship between English language learners’ motivation and online self-regulation: A structural equation modelling approach

    Chunping Zheng;Jyh Chong Liang;Mang Li;Chin Chung Tsai

  • A Long-Term Experiment to Investigate the Relationships between High School Students' Perceptions of Mobile Learning and Peer Interaction and Higher-Order Thinking Tendencies.

    Gwo Jen Hwang;Chiu Lin Lai;Jyh Chong Liang;Hui Chun Chu

  • The Development of Science Activities via On-Line Peer Assessment: The Role of Scientific Epistemological Views.

    Chin Chung Tsai;Jyh Chong Liang

  • Tablet-based AR technology: Impacts on students’ conceptions and approaches to learning mathematics according to their self-efficacy

    Su Cai;Enrui Liu;Yang Yang;Jyh Chong Liang

  • University Students' Online Academic Help Seeking: The Role of Self-Regulation and Information Commitments.

    Kun-Hung Cheng;Kun-Hung Cheng;Jyh Chong Liang;Chin Chung Tsai

  • The Computational Thinking Scale for Computer Literacy Education

    Meng Jung Tsai;Jyh Chong Liang;Chung Yuan Hsu

  • Surveying In-Service Preschool Teachers' Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge.

    Jyh Chong Liang;Ching Sing Chai;Joyce Hwee Ling Koh;Ching Ju Yang

  • Relational Analysis of College Science‐Major Students’ Epistemological Beliefs Toward Science and Conceptions of Learning Science

    Jyh Chong Liang;Chin Chung Tsai

  • A review of using partial least square structural equation modeling in e-learning research

    Hung Ming Lin;Min Hsien Lee;Jyh Chong Liang;Hsin Yi Chang

  • Facilitating Preschoolers’ Scientific Knowledge Construction via Computer Games Regarding Light and Shadow: The Effect of the Prediction-Observation-Explanation (POE) Strategy

    Chung Yuan Hsu;Chin-Chung Tsai;Jyh Chong Liang

  • Internet‐based Science Learning: A review of journal publications

    Silvia Wen Yu Lee;Chin Chung Tsai;Ying Tien Wu;Meng Jung Tsai

  • Nurses' Internet self-efficacy and attitudes toward web-based continuing learning

    Jyh Chong Liang;Szu Hsien Wu;Szu Hsien Wu;Chin Chung Tsai

  • Nurses’ motivations for Web‐based learning and the role of Internet self‐efficacy

    Jyh Chong Liang;Szu Hsien Wu

  • Examining the relationship between English language learners' online self-regulation and their self-efficacy

    You Su;You Su;Chunping Zheng;Jyh Chong Liang;Chin Chung Tsai

Frequent Co-Authors

Chin Chung Tsai
Chin Chung Tsai National Taiwan Normal University
Ching Sing Chai
Ching Sing Chai Chinese University of Hong Kong
Hsin Kai Wu
Hsin Kai Wu National Taiwan Normal University
Huei-Tse Hou
Huei-Tse Hou National Taiwan University of Science and Technology
Gwo-Jen Hwang
Gwo-Jen Hwang National Taiwan University of Science and Technology
Kuo-En Chang
Kuo-En Chang Tunghai University
Nian-Shing Chen
Nian-Shing Chen National Taiwan Normal University
Joyce Hwee Ling Koh
Joyce Hwee Ling Koh University of Otago
Hefu Liu
Hefu Liu University of Science and Technology of China
Hong-Yuan Hsu
Hong-Yuan Hsu National Taiwan University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Jyh Chong Liang

Recently Published Articles