World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Julian G. Elliott

Julian G. Elliott

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 64 1104 965 210 187 278 15797

Julian G. Elliott publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Julian G. Elliott between 1991 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Julian G. Elliott published across 35 years, from 1991 to 2025, averaging 9.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 29 publications in 2014. 26 of the 337 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1991 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 29. Peak 29 publications in 2014. 1991: 1 publication 1992: 1 publication 1993: 0 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 1 publication 1997: 1 publication 1998: 20 publications 1999: 2 publications 2000: 7 publications 2001: 3 publications 2002: 6 publications 2003: 7 publications 2004: 11 publications 2005: 17 publications 2006: 6 publications 2007: 7 publications 2008: 9 publications 2009: 13 publications 2010: 18 publications 2011: 13 publications 2012: 13 publications 2013: 17 publications 2014: 29 publications 2015: 16 publications 2016: 14 publications 2017: 15 publications 2018: 8 publications 2019: 14 publications 2020: 13 publications 2021: 16 publications 2022: 8 publications 2023: 5 publications 2024: 21 publications 2025: 5 publications
1991 2025

337 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Julian G. Elliott: publications per year, 1991 to 2025
Year Publications
1991 1
1992 1
1993 0
1994 0
1995 0
1996 1
1997 1
1998 20
1999 2
2000 7
2001 3
2002 6
2003 7
2004 11
2005 17
2006 6
2007 7
2008 9
2009 13
2010 18
2011 13
2012 13
2013 17
2014 29
2015 16
2016 14
2017 15
2018 8
2019 14
2020 13
2021 16
2022 8
2023 5
2024 21
2025 5
Total 337
Download as CSV

Julian G. Elliott publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Julian G. Elliott sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 274–283 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 278 publications — 84th percentile

84% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138 278
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Julian G. Elliott D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Julian G. Elliott sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 64 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 64 D-Index — 86th percentile

86% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79 64
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

Julian G. Elliott is affiliated with Durham University in the United Kingdom. Their research spans primarily across medicine and health professions, with a substantial focus on general health professions, public health, environmental and occupational health, statistics, probability, and uncertainty, as well as economics, econometrics, and developmental and educational psychology.

The main topics of Julian G. Elliott's work include:

  • Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
  • Clinical practice guidelines implementation
  • Health systems, economic evaluations, quality of life
  • Health sciences research and education
  • Health policy implementation science
  • Healthcare cost, quality, practices
  • Reading and literacy development

Recent publications by Elliott highlight a range of issues in clinical epidemiology, health policy, and literacy research. Selected titles include:

  • "Machine learning reduced workload with minimal risk of missing studies: development and evaluation of a randomized controlled trial classifier for Cochrane Reviews," 2020, Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
  • "Decision makers need constantly updated evidence synthesis," 2021, Nature
  • "An evaluation of Cochrane Crowd found that crowdsourcing produced accurate results in identifying randomized trials," 2021, Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
  • "Weekly updates of national living evidence-based guidelines: methods for the Australian living guidelines for care of people with COVID-19," 2020, Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
  • "It's Time to Be Scientific About Dyslexia," 2020, Reading Research Quarterly

Julian G. Elliott has collaborated frequently with several authors, including Tari Turner, James Thomas, Steve McDonald, Jeremy Grimshaw, and Britta Tendal.

The scientist's work is notably published in high-impact journals, with frequent contributions to the following venues:

  • Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
  • The Medical Journal of Australia
  • Critical Care Medicine
  • Campbell Systematic Reviews
  • Annals of Internal Medicine

Additionally, Elliott has contributed to academic books published by Cambridge University Press. Among these is "The Dyslexia Debate Revisited," released in 2024.

Best Publications

  • The cognitive and behavioral characteristics of children with low working memory.

    Tracy Packiam Alloway;Susan Elizabeth Gathercole;Hannah Kirkwood;Julian G. Elliott

  • Living systematic review: 1. Introduction-the why, what, when, and how.

    Julian H Elliott;Anneliese Synnot;Tari Turner;Mark Simmonds

  • Frameworks for Thinking: A Handbook for Teaching and Learning

    David Moseley;Vivienne Baumfield;Julian Elliott;Steven Higgins

  • Living systematic reviews: an emerging opportunity to narrow the evidence-practice gap

    Julian Elliott;Tari Joy Turner;Ornella Maria Clavisi;James Thomas

  • The Dyslexia Debate

    Julian G. Elliott;Elena L. Grigorenko

  • Working memory deficits can be overcome : impacts of training and medication on working memory in children with ADHD.

    Joni Holmes;Susan E. Gathercole;Maurice Place;Darren L. Dunning

  • Activation of HIV transcription with short-course vorinostat in HIV-infected patients on suppressive antiretroviral therapy.

    Julian H. Elliott;Fiona Wightman;Ajantha Solomon;Khader Ghneim

  • Sustainability science: an integrated approach for health-programme planning

    Russell L Gruen;Julian H Elliott;Monica L Nolan;Paul D Lawton

  • Evaluating the validity of the Automated Working Memory Assessment

    Tracy Packiam Alloway;Susan Elizabeth Gathercole;Hannah J Kirkwood;Julian G Elliott

  • Living systematic reviews: 2. Combining human and machine effort.

    James Thomas;Anna Noel-Storr;Iain Marshall;Byron Wallace

  • Living systematic reviews: 4. Living guideline recommendations

    Elie A Akl;Joerg J Meerpohl;Julian Elliott;Lara A Kahale

  • Attentional and Executive Function Behaviours in Children with Poor Working Memory.

    Susan E Gathercole;Tracy Packiam Alloway;Hannah J Kirkwood;Julian G Elliott

  • Neocolonialism in education: Cooperative Learning in an Asian context

    Phuong-Mai Nguyen;Julian G. Elliott;Cees Terlouw;Albert Pilot

  • Dynamic assessment in educational settings : realising potential.

    Julian Elliott

  • Practitioner Review: School Refusal: Issues of Conceptualisation, Assessment, and Treatment

    Julian G. Elliott

  • Machine learning reduced workload with minimal risk of missing studies: development and evaluation of a randomized controlled trial classifier for Cochrane Reviews.

    James Thomas;Steve McDonald;Anna Noel-Storr;Ian Shemilt

  • Pharmacy Adherence Measures to Assess Adherence to Antiretroviral Therapy: Review of the Literature and Implications for Treatment Monitoring

    James H McMahon;James H McMahon;Michael R Jordan;Michael R Jordan;Karen Kelley;Silvia Bertagnolio

  • Frameworks for Thinking: List of figures

    David Moseley;Vivienne Baumfield;Julian Elliott;Steven Higgins

  • The Diagnostic Utility of Executive Function Assessments in the Identification of ADHD in Children.

    Joni Holmes;Susan E Gathercole;Maurice Place;Tracy Packiam Alloway

  • The working memory rating scale: A classroom-based behavioral assessment of working memory

    Tracy Packiam Alloway;Susan Elizabeth Gathercole;Hannah Kirkwood;Julian Elliott

  • Thinking skills frameworks for use in education and training

    David Moseley;Julian Elliott;Maggie Gregson;Steve Higgins

  • Does Dyslexia Exist

    Julian G. Elliott;Simon Gibbs

  • Living Systematic Review

    Julian H. Elliott;Tari Turner;Ornella Clavisi;James Thomas

Frequent Co-Authors

Sharon R. Lewin
Sharon R. Lewin University of Melbourne
Martyn A. French
Martyn A. French University of Western Australia
Jennifer F Hoy
Jennifer F Hoy Monash University
Paul U. Cameron
Paul U. Cameron University of Melbourne
Tracy Packiam Alloway
Tracy Packiam Alloway University of North Florida
Brian Oldenburg
Brian Oldenburg University of Melbourne
Elena L. Grigorenko
Elena L. Grigorenko University of Houston
Susan E. Gathercole
Susan E. Gathercole University of Cambridge
Christopher K. Fairley
Christopher K. Fairley Monash University
Suzanne M. Crowe
Suzanne M. Crowe Burnet Institute

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees opens diverse career pathways for students interested in Social Sciences and Humanities. Many prospective professionals seek accredited programs that balance affordability, flexibility, and career outcomes. For those interested in social work, considering the cheapest online msw programs allows students to access quality education without excessive debt.

Fast-paced learners may benefit from a fast track social work degree online, enabling them to enter the field quickly while gaining essential skills. Those looking to specialize in behavior analysis can explore bcba masters programs, preparing for board certification and clinical practice.

For individuals passionate about mental health and psychological services, an accelerated bachelor's in psychology can launch a career in counseling, research, or education. Online programs also provide accessible education to working adults and non-traditional students, helping them meet their professional goals in today's dynamic job market.

Best Scientists Citing Julian G. Elliott

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles