World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
41
Citations
10146
World Ranking
7761
National Ranking
459

Todd C. Handy publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Todd C. Handy sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 142 publications — 39th percentile

39% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Todd C. Handy D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Todd C. Handy sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Todd C. Handy is affiliated with the University of British Columbia in Canada. Their research spans multiple areas within medicine and neuroscience, with a particular focus on cognitive neuroscience. The principal fields of study include medicine and neuroscience, supported by extensive work in related subfields such as cognitive neuroscience, health, toxicology and mutagenesis, psychiatry and mental health, radiology, nuclear medicine and imaging, and experimental and cognitive psychology.

Their research encompasses several main topics, featuring studies on functional brain connectivity, dementia and cognitive impairment, neural and behavioral psychology, health and environment as related to cognitive aging, mind wandering and attention, behavioral health and interventions, and sleep and related disorders.

Recent publications by Todd C. Handy include:

  • "A Wrinkle in Measuring Time Use for Cognitive Health: How should We Measure Physical Activity, Sedentary Behaviour and Sleep?" (2021) in the American Journal of Lifestyle Medicine
  • "Painting by lesions: White matter hyperintensities disrupt functional networks and global cognition" (2021) in NeuroImage
  • "Misokinesia is a sensitivity to seeing others fidget that is prevalent in the general population" (2021) in Scientific Reports
  • "The role of spatial ability in mixed reality learning with the HoloLens" (2021) in Anatomical Sciences Education
  • "The nature effect in motion: visual exposure to environmental scenes impacts cognitive load and human gait kinematics" (2021) in Royal Society Open Science

Todd C. Handy frequently collaborates with several researchers, including Teresa Liu-Ambrose, Nárlon Cássio Boa Sorte Silva, Lisanne F. ten Brinke, Chun Liang Hsu, and Ryan G Stein. These collaborations have contributed to numerous publications across various domains related to cognitive health and neuroscience.

Their studies are often published in recognized venues such as Alzheimer's & Dementia, PLoS ONE, Scientific Reports, Journal of Alzheimer's Disease, and Frontiers in Human Neuroscience.

Best Publications

  • Meta-awareness, perceptual decoupling and the wandering mind

    Jonathan W. Schooler;Jonathan Smallwood;Kalina Christoff;Todd C. Handy

  • Event-related potentials : a methods handbook

    Todd C. Handy

  • Resistance Training and Executive Functions: A 12-Month Randomized Controlled Trial

    Teresa Liu-Ambrose;Lindsay S. Nagamatsu;Peter Graf;B. Lynn Beattie

  • Going awol in the brain: Mind wandering reduces cortical analysis of external events

    Jonathan Smallwood;Emily Beach;Jonathan W. Schooler;Todd C. Handy

  • Resistance training promotes cognitive and functional brain plasticity in seniors with probable mild cognitive impairment.

    Lindsay S. Nagamatsu;Todd C. Handy;C. Liang Hsu;Michelle Voss

  • Resistance training and functional plasticity of the aging brain: a 12-month randomized controlled trial

    Teresa Liu-Ambrose;Teresa Liu-Ambrose;Lindsay S. Nagamatsu;Lindsay S. Nagamatsu;Michelle W. Voss;Karim M. Khan;Karim M. Khan

  • Slow fluctuations in attentional control of sensory cortex

    Julia W. Y. Kam;Elizabeth Dao;James Farley;Kevin Fitzpatrick

  • Graspable objects grab attention when the potential for action is recognized.

    Todd C. Handy;Scott T. Grafton;Neha M. Shroff;Sarah Ketay

  • The association between cognitive function and white matter lesion location in older adults: a systematic review

    Niousha Bolandzadeh;Jennifer C Davis;Roger Tam;Todd C Handy

  • Attention and spatial selection: electrophysiological evidence for modulation by perceptual load.

    Todd C. Handy;George R. Mangun

  • Extensive Individual Differences in Brain Activations Associated with Episodic Retrieval are Reliable Over Time

    Michael B. Miller;John Darrell Van Horn;George L. Wolford;Todd C. Handy

  • Perceptual Load and Visuocortical Processing: Event-Related Potentials Reveal Sensory-Level Selection

    Todd C. Handy;Maryam Soltani;George R. Mangun

  • Promoting Novelty in Vision: Inhibition of Return Modulates Perceptual-Level Processing

    Todd C. Handy;Amishi P. Jha;George R. Mangun

  • When it becomes mine: Attentional biases triggered by object ownership

    David J. Turk;Kim van Bussel;Joanne L. Brebner;Andreea S. Toma

  • Spatial distribution of visual attention: Perceptual sensitivity and response latency

    Todd C. Handy;Alan Kingstone;George R. Mangun

  • The anatomic basis of the right face-selective N170 IN acquired prosopagnosia: a combined ERP/fMRI study.

    Kirsten A. Dalrymple;Ipek Oruç;Brad Duchaine;Raika Pancaroglu

  • The neurocognitive consequences of the wandering mind: a mechanistic account of sensory-motor decoupling

    Julia W. Y. Kam;Todd C. Handy

  • Brain responses to biological relevance

    Christine M. Tipper;Todd C. Handy;Barry Giesbrecht;Alan Kingstone

  • Monitoring the visual world: Hemispheric asymmetries and subcortical processes in attention

    G. R. Mangun;S. J. Luck;R. Plager;W. Loftus

  • Neural systems mediating field and observer memories.

    Eric Eich;Andrea L. Nelson;M. Adil Leghari;Todd C. Handy

Frequent Co-Authors

Teresa Liu-Ambrose
Teresa Liu-Ambrose University of British Columbia
Michelle W. Voss
Michelle W. Voss University of Iowa
Michael S. Gazzaniga
Michael S. Gazzaniga University of California, Santa Barbara
Lara A. Boyd
Lara A. Boyd University of British Columbia
George R. Mangun
George R. Mangun University of California, Davis
Scott T. Grafton
Scott T. Grafton University of California, Santa Barbara
Jason J. S. Barton
Jason J. S. Barton University of British Columbia
James T. Enns
James T. Enns University of British Columbia
Jonathan W. Schooler
Jonathan W. Schooler University of California, Santa Barbara
Kirk I. Erickson
Kirk I. Erickson University of Pittsburgh

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

When considering a Neuroscience degree in the USA, it's helpful to explore related fields that offer strong career prospects and flexible learning options. Many students are drawn to highest paid college majors that intersect with neuroscience, such as bioengineering, psychology, and data science, opening doors to lucrative roles in healthcare and technology.

For those balancing work or other commitments, online education is increasingly attractive. Exploring cheap online colleges that accept fafsa can help make a high-quality education more accessible and affordable, particularly for undergraduates or those seeking a career change.

Additionally, earning certificates i can get online in areas like medical coding, data analysis, or health informatics can quickly boost your skill set and earning potential. These credentials are especially useful for supplementing a neuroscience background.

If you want a flexible academic journey, consider enrolling in online college courses that are known for manageable workloads and adaptable schedules. This approach allows you to tailor your studies based on your goals, interests, and life circumstances.

Best Scientists Citing Todd C. Handy

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles