World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
54
Citations
24807
World Ranking
2081
National Ranking
81

Nico Verloop publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nico Verloop sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 170 publications — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Nico Verloop D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nico Verloop sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 54 D-Index — 73rd percentile

73% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

Nico Verloop is affiliated with Leiden University in the Netherlands. Their academic and research activities are centered within this institution, contributing to its scholarly output.

Details on their recent papers, frequent co-authors, publication venues, book publications, fields of study, subfields, topics of work, and awards are not available at this time.

Best Publications

  • Reconsidering research on teachers' professional identity

    Douwe Beijaard;Paulien C. Meijer;Nico Verloop

  • Teachers’ perceptions of professional identity: an exploratory study from a personal knowledge perspective

    Douwe Beijaard;Nico Verloop;Jan D Vermunt

  • Developing science teachers' pedagogical content knowledge

    Jan H. van Driel;Nico Verloop;Wobbe de Vos

  • Professional development and reform in science education: The role of teachers' practical knowledge

    Jan H. van Driel;Douwe Beijaard;Nico Verloop

  • Congruence and friction between learning and teaching

    Jan D Vermunt;Nico Verloop

  • Teacher knowledge and the knowledge base of teaching.

    Nico Verloop;Jan Van Driel;Paulien Meijer

  • The Development of Preservice Chemistry Teachers' Pedagogical Content Knowledge

    Jan H. Van Driel;Onno De Jong;Nico Verloop

  • Teachers' Knowledge of Models and Modelling in Science.

    Jan H. Van Driel;Nico Verloop

  • Multi-Method Triangulation in a Qualitative Study on Teachers' Practical Knowledge: An Attempt to Increase Internal Validity

    Paulien C. Meijer;Nico Verloop;Douwe Beijaard

  • Preservice teachers' pedagogical content knowledge of using particle models in teaching chemistry

    Onno De Jong;Jan H. Van Driel;Nico Verloop

  • A closer look at teachers’ individual learning in collaborative settings

    Jacobiene A. Meirink;Paulien C. Meijer;Nico Verloop

  • The Portfolio as a Tool for Stimulating Reflection by Student Teachers.

    Désirée D. Mansvelder-Longayroux;Douwe Beijaard;Nico Verloop

  • Exploring language teachers' practical knowledge about teaching reading comprehension

    Paulien C. Meijer;Nico Verloop;Douwe Beijaard

  • Teacher learning and collaboration in innovative teams

    Jacobiene A. Meirink;Jeroen Imants;Paulien C. Meijer;Nico Verloop

  • Understanding Teacher Learning in Secondary Education: The Relations of Teacher Activities to Changed Beliefs about Teaching and Learning.

    Jacobiene A. Meirink;Paulien C. Meijer;Nico Verloop;Theo C.M. Bergen

  • Experienced teachers' knowledge of teaching and learning of models and modelling in science education

    Jan H. Van Driel;Nico Verloop

  • Development of Experienced Science Teachers’ Pedagogical Content Knowledge of Models of the Solar System and the Universe

    Ineke Henze;Jan H. van Driel;Nico Verloop

  • The Relationships between Teachers' General Beliefs about Teaching and Learning and Their Domain Specific Curricular Beliefs.

    Jan H. Van Driel;Aastrid M. W. Bulte;Nico Verloop

  • Assessing teachers' practical knowledge

    Douwe Beijaard;Nico Verloop

  • Professionele ontwikkeling van leraren: een reviewstudie naar effectieve kenmerken van professionaliseringsinterventies van leraren

    Klaas van Veen;R. C. Zwart;J. A. Meirink;Nico Verloop

Frequent Co-Authors

Douwe Beijaard
Douwe Beijaard Eindhoven University of Technology
Jan H. van Driel
Jan H. van Driel University of Melbourne
Jan D. Vermunt
Jan D. Vermunt Eindhoven University of Technology
Paulien C. Meijer
Paulien C. Meijer Radboud University
Mieke Brekelmans
Mieke Brekelmans Utrecht University
Theo Wubbels
Theo Wubbels Utrecht University
Sanne Akkerman
Sanne Akkerman Utrecht University
Jan van Tartwijk
Jan van Tartwijk Utrecht University
Eddie Denessen
Eddie Denessen Radboud University
Perry den Brok
Perry den Brok Wageningen University & Research

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Social Sciences and Humanities in the USA opens up diverse online study and career opportunities. Students seeking advanced, flexible education can consider 1 year msw programs online, which allow for a fast track toward a rewarding career in social work with the flexibility of remote learning.

Those interested in human behavior and mental health support can take advantage of accelerated psychology bachelor's degree online programs. These degrees provide foundational knowledge and can be completed quickly to start careers in counseling, education, or research sooner.

If your goal is to become a licensed counselor, best online cacrep counseling programs ensure rigorous, accredited training, often a prerequisite for professional certification and licensure. For those passionate about helping couples and families, affordable online mft programs provide specialized training for a career in marriage and family therapy.

These online pathways offer flexible, affordable options, supporting diverse career aspirations within the social sciences and humanities.

Best Scientists Citing Nico Verloop

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles